Hoka Mafate Speed 4 review

We believe the Hoka Mafate 4 is an outstanding pick for:

• Trail enthusiasts seeking a reliable and durable all-terrain shoe.
• Devotees of Hoka's road shoes looking for a cushioned trail companion.
• Ultrarunners who need a versatile, high-mileage workhorse for their training and racing.

If you're often tackling terrain with small rocks and debris, the Mafate Speed 4 might not be your best bet. Its heel design tends to attract and trap debris, potentially disrupting your runs. Instead, opt for a model without this design flaw, such as the Nike Wildhorse 8 or the Saucony Peregrine 13.

Additionally, for runners seeking pure speed on flat trails, we believe the Mafate's 4-mm lugs and average-at-best energy return may not be the best choice. In these scenarios, we think you're likely to benefit more from a trail shoe with shorter lugs, Pebax midsole technology, and a carbon plate. Options like the Nike Ultrafly or the Saucony Endorphin Edge could better meet your needs.

We just touched on the stack height, and now it's time to check its measurements in the lab.

Standing tall at 38.0 mm, if you're in search of a cushioned trail shoe, your search ends with the Mafate Speed 4. This shoe boasts a generous amount of foam underfoot, making it an excellent option for heel strikers who need ample cushioning.

The forefoot also exceeds the 30-mm mark, measuring at 30.8 mm. This means that ground feel probably won't be present in this shoe, even for forefoot strikers.

This is also why Hoka chose to omit a rock plate in this shoe—there's enough foam to provide sufficient foot protection.

By subtracting the forefoot measurement from the heel, we got a real 7.2-mm heel-to-toe drop.

While most Hokas feature low-drop geometries, we're pleased with this number for the Mafate. It successfully caters to a broad spectrum of runners, accommodating all footstrikes in one shoe.

Shifting our focus to the ProFly+ midsole, we anticipated the classic plush feel characteristic of Hoka, and we found some of it.

The primary foam, located closer to the foot, measured at 17.5 HA, providing that distinct softness underfoot. And this sensation is further enhanced by the thin insole.

Like many Hoka models nowadays, the Mafate Speed 4 boasts a dual-density midsole. In this case, the denser, notably-firmer foam is placed closer to the ground, enhancing stability.

We measured this secondary foam at 28.0 HA, which is quite firm and definitely noticeable while running.

Upon measuring the big toe area, we found it to be 75.3 mm, indicating limited wiggle room for your toes. If ample space for toe splay is a priority, you might want to check out less tapered alternatives like the New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro V7.

The 30.3% difference aligns with the average, which didn't surprise us given the midsole's it's made with compression-moulded EVA.

For a shoe priced close to £200, experiencing a more advanced superfoam, at least in the primary layer, would be a reasonable expectation.

The insole is a bit thinner than usual at 3.3 mm, but it's not a cause for concern at all. Given the substantial amount of foam in the shoe, you're unlikely to notice the slight difference of a millimetre or two in the insole.

Hoka typically designs narrow, performance-focused toeboxes, and the Mafate Speed 4 follows suit. We measured its widest part at 97.9 mm, accommodating those with normal-width feet and even moderately narrow or wide feet comfortably.

But why doesn't Hoka opt for wider toeboxes? Here at RunRepeat's Lab, we believe it's a matter of stability.

Combining a narrow upper with a wide midsole results in a stable shoe without the need for additional medial posts or other intrusive support features. This approach is also becoming increasingly popular in road running shoes.

Upon measuring the big toe area, we found it to be 75.3 mm, indicating limited wiggle room for your toes. If ample space for toe splay is a priority, you might want to check out less tapered alternatives like the New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro V7.

We previously mentioned that certain aspects of the shoe are designed with stability in mind, and indeed, we experienced a reassuring sense of stability in the Mafate Speed 4, even while running downhill!

A significant portion of this stability is due to the shoe's substantial torsional rigidity, which we rated 4 out of 5.

This limited flexibility can be attributed to the shoe's large midsole and the denser secondary foam.

However, we were quite surprised to discover a fairly flexible heel counter, which we rated only 2 out of 5.

This relatively low score might be due to the shoe's construction, as it extends high into the Achilles area for support. Therefore, it doesn't need excessive stiffness to stabilise that area and prevent heel slippage.

In the forefoot, we measured 115.8 mm, which is slightly wider than the average shoe. This design is intentionally aimed at providing stability, especially for forefoot and midfoot strikers.

Upon taking this measurement in the lab, we instantly understood why we felt so assured while running downhill.

With a massive width of 101.1 mm, the Mafate Speed 4 truly excels in heel landings, providing remarkable stability and confidence!

While the Mafate Speed 4 is quite stiff torsionally, it's much more flexible longitudinally, which is a feature we appreciated. This flexibility makes it suitable for walking or hiking. 

In our 90-degree bend test, we only needed to apply 24.5N of force.

After placing the shoe in the freezer again to simulate cold conditions, we repeated the stiffness test. The force required this time increased to 31.8N.

This reflects a 29.8% increase, aligning with the change observed in softness. It correlates well with the performance we tipically observe in CMEVA foams, which is the type used in this shoe.

The Mafate Speed 4 is designed as a cushioned trail shoe, which naturally means it can't be as ultra-lightweight as the featherlike Hoka Zinal 2.

Yet, it doesn't feel heavy and just slightly exceeds the 10-oz mark, weighing in at 10.3 oz (293g). This is a good result, especially considering its huge stack height.

The upper of this Hoka doesn't immediately strike us as highly breathable, but we're here to test, not just speculate. So we hooked up our smoke-pumping machine to the Mafate Speed 4 to assess its actual breathability.

Our testing led us to a score of 3 out of 5, which is average but respectable for a trail shoe. Remember that excessive airflow can compromise comfort in colder conditions, which is when these shoes are often used.

Shining a light through the upper revealed Hoka's design strategy. The shoe has a base layer of thin mesh, with large overlays across the instep and added midfoot reinforcement for stability—factors contributing to its average breathability score.

Under the microscope, we found that Hoka opted for an engineered mesh without ventilation holes, clearly prioritising durability above all.

The upper offers some flexibility and decent padding, concealing all stitches under fabric for enhanced comfort.

We were impressed with its performance and achieving a 3 out of 5 without any ventilation holes is commendable.

Upon closely inspecting the shoe, we noticed that Hoka prioritised protecting the upper with multiple layers, even if it meant sacrificing a bit of airflow, as we previously observed.

This strategy proved fruitful. As evident in the comparison picture below against the UA Charged Assert 10, the Mafate 4 stands out impressively after the Dremel test. We awarded it a solid 4 out of 5 for its robust design and effective protection.

The heel padding of the Mafate Speed 4 performed exceptionally well in our Dremel test, which was a pleasant surprise.

Just a few days earlier, we had tested the Tecton X 2 in the lab, where it scored the lowest, a mere 1 out of 5. However, the Mafate Speed 4 impressively earned a 4 out of 5, a truly fantastic score!

In the outsole, we discovered the famed Vibram Megagrip Litebase rubber, which delivered a hardness of 85.8 HC.

Teaming up with Vibram often proves to be a wise decision. During our test runs, we noticed that the outsole grips exceptionally well.

But there's always the question of whether it will provide sufficient durability.

Luckily, after our rigorous Dremel test in the lab, we observed only a 0.9-mm indentation, suggesting that the shoe won't face significant durability issues. However, we also believe it's not among the most durable outsoles on the trail running market.

Wrapping up our discussion on the outsole for now, we measured its thickness at 2.1 mm. While some runners might favour a thicker outsole for added durability, we believe this thickness is a wise choice.

A thicker layer of rubber can mute the midsole's feel and create a firmer sensation underfoot while running, which isn't typically what Hoka aims to deliver.

The Mafate Speed 4 is specifically designed for technical and loose terrains, which explains the 4 mm lugs on its outsole. Anything shorter would compromise the shoe's intended purpose.

For less demanding trails, Hoka offers alternatives like the Speedgoat 5, which features shorter, 3-mm lugs.

Equally noteworthy is the variety in the shapes and textures of the Hoka's Traction Lugs. We observed a dominance of chevron-style shapes in the heel and sides for enhanced traction on both downhills and uphills, complemented by rectangular lugs in the centre of the forefoot.

Here in the lab, we're big fans of reflective elements on trail running shoes. Luckily, the Mafate Speed 4 didn't disappoint us in this department!

The tongue is impressively padded at 7.5 mm, exceeding our expectations.

It features a thick, plush layer of foam that works wonderfully in preventing any discomfort in the instep area.

Hoka has a clear preference for semi-gusseted tongues, as evidenced by this model—the gusset is black, but it's there—and we're happy with that decision, as they strike a nice balance between ensuring a secure lockdown and keeping the weight low.

However, for shoes designed for rugged terrain, we generally lean towards fully gusseted tongues for enhanced security and comfort.

The heel features a finger-loop tab, which appears to serve more as a style element than a functional one.

But there's a downside to this area we need to mention—the design of the ankle collar acts like a funnel, constantly allowing debris to enter the shoe, which can be quite bothersome.

Removing the insole was hassle-free as it's not glued, but be wary that some OTC orthotics or insoles from other shoes might not fit well due to the shoe's narrow last.