6 Trail Running Shoes With The Best Traction in 2025

Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic on
6 Trail Running Shoes With The Best Traction in 2025

We buy shoes ourselves. We earn commissions when you buy through us, at no extra cost. Why trust us

Which outsoles are the grippiest of them all? How to figure out which shoes are OK for dry surfaces and which ones will not let you down in mud or on wet flat boulders? We answer all of these by looking at the results of the traction test. Welcome to our nerd place, where we examine traction in the proper way: objectively and transparently. 

How we test Trail running shoes with the traction


Testing running shoes has to be standardised, and that’s where our lab enters the scene. This standardisation means that each trail shoe is given the same treatment: the same forces applied, the same durometers used, they are tested on the same surfaces, filled with the same smoke at the same speed, and so on. Thanks to our specialised machines for traction, shock absorption, and energy return, we take it a step further and don’t rely on simple tools and devices only. We also test trail shoes outside the lab to understand their comfort, fit, and performance, from a perspective that the lab can not offer.

All of that would make no sense if we were biased and allowing brands to influence our shoe choices or what we publish. That’s why we don’t do it. We also buy all the trail running shoes from our own pocket. And we don’t allow brand ambassadors to join the team.

Best trail running shoes with high traction overall

What makes it the best?

The ASICS Trabuco Max 4 feels more like a minor refresh than a full redesign, holding onto the same DNA as the last version with its towering stack, super-stiff build, and hefty weight. On our runs, we were impressed by the huge forefoot cushioning and solid stability, which make it a dependable choice for long, non-technical trails. Still, the FF Blast+ foam feels outdated and lacks excitement, while the sharply tapered toebox cuts down on toe splay.

Pros

  • Huge forefoot cushioning
  • Full-length ASICSGRIP rubber
  • Extremely stable despite its height
  • Can handle any distance
  • Handy tongue loop keeps laces quiet
  • Well-padded, comfortable tongue
  • Rockered shape for easy transitions
  • Ideal for flat, easy trails

Cons

  • Not ideal for heel strikers
  • Questionable outsole durability
  • Heavy build
  • Tapered toebox
Full review of ASICS Trabuco Max 4

Best lightweight trail running shoes with high traction

What makes it the best?

The S/Lab Genesis is a fascinating yet slightly frustrating shoe. We found in the lab that it could have been outstanding with a premium midsole, but its EVA foam limits rebound and responsiveness. On our runs, the shoe felt stable and secure, and we really liked its ultra-light MATRYX upper, rock-plate protection, and glove-like fit. However, we feel that, considering its premium cost, it lacks the energetic ride that should come standard.

Pros

  • Exceptionally lightweight
  • Premium MATRYX upper
  • Excellent lockdown
  • Plush, well-padded tongue
  • Quick and efficient Quicklace lacing system
  • Works for running and hiking
  • Versatile Contagrip outsole with rock plate
  • Unique aesthetics
  • Feels great on fast downhills

Cons

  • EVA-based midsole lacks bounce
  • Expensive for the technology provided
  • Upper durability could be improved
  • Low shock absorption
Full review of Salomon S/Lab Genesis

High-traction trail running shoes with the best shock absorption

What makes it the best?

The Metafuji Trail feels both impressive and disappointing at once. We found in our lab tests that its shock absorption, upper, and outsole are first-class, showing real potential. However, the dual-foam combo featuring FF Blast+ and FF Turbo holds it back, making the ride less energetic than expected. Oh, and the fit is tight and narrow, which can be a problem for those using it for ultras.

Pros

  • Exceptional shock absorption
  • Amazing ASICSGRIP outsole
  • High-end build quality
  • Ideal for narrow feet
  • Lightweight for a trail shoe
  • Fast-rolling forefoot rocker
  • Ideal for easy, flat-ish ultras
  • Outstanding upper with top ventilation
  • Record-breaking stack height

Cons

  • FF Blast+ foam limits energy return
  • Expensive
  • Minimal stability
  • Delicate upper prone to tearing
Full review of ASICS Metafuji Trail

Best high-traction trail running shoes for tough terrain

Icebug Järv RB9X
N/A
Not enough reviews yet

What makes it the best?

We think the Icebug Järv RB9X offers a refreshing, outside-the-mainstream approach that many runners will enjoy. In our lab tests, we were impressed by its eco-friendly build, strong energy return, and high-stack protection. We loved the durable upper and the deep, versatile lugs that handled mixed terrain with ease. It’s true that the high weight and firm midsole may limit its appeal, and the price sits near the premium zone, but we believe Icebug produced a solid trail shoe that truly rivals the usual choices.

Pros

  • Sustainable materials
  • Strong energy return from eTPU foam
  • High, protective stack height
  • Excellent for cold climates
  • Very durable toebox
  • Versatile 5.0 mm lugs
  • Supercritical insole
  • Outsole grips well

Cons

  • Heavy on foot
  • Knit upper retains water
  • Firm underfoot feel
  • Low ventilation
Full review of Icebug Järv RB9X

Best high-traction trail running shoes for hiking

What makes it the best?

In our experience, the Xodus Ultra 4 is the best version yet, even with its price bump and heavier build. The new Vibram outsole finally unlocks the shoe’s full potential, pairing beautifully with the fantastic PWRRUN PB foam. Based on our findings, heel strikers get first-class stability, while midfoot and forefoot strikers experience top-tier shock absorption and smooth, rockered transitions.

Pros

  • Amazing bounce from PWRRUN PB foam
  • First Xodus Ultra with a Vibram outsole
  • Stable platform underfoot
  • Premium PWRRUN+ insole
  • Works well for hiking too
  • Full-length outsole coverage
  • Excellent for ultras
  • Fantastic traction on easy terrain

Cons

  • Weight is becoming a real problem
  • Tapered toebox fit
  • Small price increase
  • Weak heel padding durability
Full review of Saucony Xodus Ultra 4

Best high-traction trail running shoes with a wide toebox

What makes it the best?

In our experience, the Altra Experience Wild 2 is a clear mix of highs and lows. We really liked the lighter, extra-roomy upper, which feels much better than before and noticeably improves the fit. But we also found in the lab that the midsole still uses the same foam with subpar energy return, and from our perspective this single issue stops the shoe from becoming the fantastic trail option it could have been.

Pros

  • Extremely roomy toebox
  • Very stable ride, especially up front
  • Beginner-friendly drop for Altra newcomers
  • Flexible build with natural feel
  • Impressive durability across the board
  • Noticeably lighter than version 1
  • Improved heel retention
  • Better lacing system
  • Same price as before

Cons

  • Bad energy return
  • Limited ventilation
  • Non-gusseted tongue
  • Not for narrow feet
Full review of Altra Experience Wild 2

In trail running shoes, we often focus on the depth of the lugs, their shape, number, or overall design. However, traction also depends on the rubber compound itself. Some are grippier and stickier, others are not. That is exactly what we uncover further below. 

testing the traction of trail running shoes

What the lab traction test can (not) tell us

Testing the traction in the lab is great because this test is standardised. It’s repeatable, always under the same conditions. So here’s how it’s done.

We follow the SATRA TM144 methodology, which means that we use this specialised machine to ensure the testing is done properly 

This machine allows us to press the shoe with a force of 500 N against a wet, sliding surface. The shoe is tilted at a 7-degree angle. All of this is done to mimic the real-life scenario. The surface is wet because we’re interested in what happens when the conditions get rough and because wet surfaces are where we mostly find out our shoes are not good enough. 

concrete-slab-traction-test-trail-shoes.jpg
This is a concrete slab that we use for testing. We make a fresh slab regularly to ensure the same testing conditions for all trail shoes

This test actually tells us how grippy the rubber itself is. As you know, for trail running, it’s also important to take into account the depth of the lugs, their distance from one another, shape and orientation, and so on. But the test done in compliance with SATRA TM144 protocol tells us how grippy the outsole is overall, which is why the test is done on the wet concrete. 

What we actually measure on this test is the so-called dynamic Coefficient of friction (CoF). The higher it is, the better the traction. Actually, anything equal or higher than 0.45 we consider high traction. Between 0.25 and 0.45 moderate, and below 0.25 is very low traction. 

similar-lugs-different-durability-trail-traction.jpg
These trail running shoe outsoles have similar lug depth, but different traction: the outsole on the left has 3.1 mm deep lugs and a traction score of 0.81, while the outsole on the right has lugs 3.2 mm deep and a traction score of 0.57

2 outsole features to pay attention to in trail running shoes with the best traction

Having great traction does not mean too much if the rubber is not durable because it will just disappear too fast under your feet. In that case, a pair of trail shoes you invested in will be ready for retirement or for other terrain that was not the pair’s purpose. Here, we should look at 2 things: not just the durability of the rubber, but also the thickness of the lugs. The thicker they are, the more material there is to be subjected to wear and tear. 

We use a dremel to test the durability of the outsole. There’s always some damage and we measure the depth of the dent/hole with a tyre tread gauge 

The deeper the dent, the less durable the outsole. Below, we will look at 2 examples, both of which have high traction, but the durability varies significantly. 

Dremel made a hole that's only 0.6 mm deep on Challenger 8's outsole 
Here, on the other hand, the hole is 1.7 mm deep (it's Trabuco max 4)

It is obvious that the thicker the lugs, the better! For trail shoes with very shallow lugs, we could also look at the outsole thickness as a way to ensure it’s still the rubber touching the ground, not an exposed midsole. But the traction in trail running shoes is about lugs, not flat rubber, so we will stick to the lug thickness. 

diff-lug-thickness-traction-trail-shoes.jpg

Price of trail running shoes with high traction

Currently, the average price of trail running shoes is £150. When we group those with high traction, their average price sits at £190

It’s comforting to know that the prices listed here are MSRPs or manufacturer’s suggested retail prices. Basically, this is how much the shoes cost when they were released. And who does not love a good discount? We, of course, made a page dedicated to running shoe deals. 

Author
Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic
Whether it's a vertical kilometre or an ultra, climbing in the Alps or exploring local mountains, Jovana uses every opportunity to trade walls and concrete for forests and trails. She logs at least 10h/week on trails, with no off-season, and 4x more on research on running and running shoes. With a background in physics and engineering management, she prefers her running spiced with data.