Our verdict

87
Great
  • Speed 65
  • Stability 82
  • Cushioning 90
The Babolat SFX 4 is one of the most comfort-oriented tennis and pickleball shoes we've tested in the lab. From its abundantly padded interiors to the extended Extra Cushion in the heel, the shoe made long matches feel easier on our feet. It also proved to be one of the most accommodating tennis shoes with a roomy toebox that never made our toes beg for space. And for the price, we can forgive some of this Babolat shoe's shortcomings considering its impressive results across the board.

Pros

  • Amazing value for money
  • Heavenly out-of-the-box comfort
  • Excellent shock absorption
  • Extra Cushion for comfortable heel landings
  • Super tacky and durable Michelin outsole
  • Stable platform with an outrigger
  • Spacious toebox

Cons

  • Dull and unresponsive midsole
  • Not for aggressive players
  • Heavier than average

Who should buy

We believe that the Babolat SFX 4 is likely to meet the needs of beginner and recreational tennis and pickleball players who:

  • prefer stable shoes that put comfort and cushioning first
  • have a tight shoe budget but want a great bang for the buck
  • need a wide-fitting shoe

Babolat SFX 4 review

Who should NOT buy

We wouldn’t choose the Babolat SFX 4 for aggressive baseline play. Its broad platform feels steady, but the shoe lacks side-to-side containment as a dedicated stability shoe. The ASICS Gel Challenger 15 is a much more structured and supportive option in that regard.

If your game relies on quick adjustment steps and frequent scrambles to the net, the SFX 4’s heavy build and muted push-off may feel sluggish. We’d opt for the lighter ASICS Solution Speed FF 4 for easier footwork without giving up impact protection.

And for hot-weather matches, we’d consider the Nike Vapor Lite 3 instead.

Babolat SFX 4 lab test

Cushioning

Shock absorption

We were pleasantly surprised by the cushioning and impact protection of the Babolat SFX 4 on hard court.

Showing above-average shock absorption in both the heel (102 SA) and the forefoot (75 SA), it softens the blow of hard stops and landings remarkably well.

Babolat SFX 4 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
SFX 4 102 SA
Average 99 SA
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
47 SA
Shock absorption
116 SA

Energy return

However, the shoe's midsole foam is far from responsive. In fact, it feels rather dull, with very low energy return of 42.3% in the forefoot and 42.1% in the heel.

That makes its platform feel grounded and controlled but offers zero springback.

Forefoot
Heel
Test results
SFX 4 42.3%
Average 50.2%
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
34.0%
Energy return
66.0%

Heel stack

With an above-average heel stack height of 32.8 mm, this Babolat shoe feels more elevated than most tennis shoes.

While the extra midsole foam provides more room for comfort and cushioning, it may be less preferred by players accustomed to a more intimate court feel.

Babolat SFX 4 Heel stack
Test results
SFX 4 32.8 mm
Average 29.4 mm
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
24.3 mm
Heel stack
33.3 mm

Forefoot stack

Our caliper also confirmed that the SFX 4's forefoot stack height sits above average at 22.2 mm.

This is a welcome setup for athletes who enjoy more protection under the ball of the foot and the toe joints.

Babolat SFX 4 Forefoot stack
Test results
SFX 4 22.2 mm
Average 19.4 mm
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
14.4 mm
Forefoot stack
23.4 mm

Drop

True to its specs, we measured the shoe's heel-to-toe drop at 10.6 mm, which is a typical offset for tennis shoes.

A slightly elevated heel helps reduce stress on the Achilles and calves and makes forward weight transfer a bit easier during the game.

However, combined with the shoe's spacious fit, this drop can cause toe jamming if the lockdown is not secure enough.

Babolat SFX 4 Drop
Test results
SFX 4 10.6 mm
Average 10.0 mm
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
6.2 mm
Drop
14.7 mm

Midsole softness

Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

Babolat doesn't specify the type of foam used for the SFX 4, but given the shoe's price point, we believe it's standard EVA foam.

But to our surprise, this basic cushioning foam turned out to be slightly softer than average, with a durometer reading of 44.7 AC. It is still firm by our standards, but that bit of give adds a nice touch of underfoot comfort in this Babolat shoe.

Babolat SFX 4 Midsole softness
Test results
SFX 4 44.7 AC
Average 48.0 AC
Compared to 34 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
32.8 AC
Soft ←→ Firm
63.8 AC

Rocker

We don't see heel extensions and pronounced rocker geometries on tennis shoes very often, so the Extra Cushion rearfoot design on the Babolat SFX 4 definitely stands out.

The elongated heel extends the shoe's cushioning platform further back to accommodate heel-first landings, especially as they happen at different angles.

Babolat SFX 4 Rocker

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
Babolat SFX 4 Internal length
Test results
SFX 4 272.7 mm
Average 271.9 mm
Compared to 35 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
264.2 mm
Internal length
280.4 mm

Width / Fit

One of this Babolat shoe's main selling points is the SFX design, which stands for Superior Fit eXperience. It promises a wider fit and is claimed to be 'designed for wider feet.'

Creating a one-to-one gel cast of its interiors, we couldn't wait to check if that was true.

Surprisingly, our caliper measured a regular, medium-range width of 91.9 mm at the cast's widest point.

However, it's the shoe's spacious toebox that makes all the difference.

Babolat SFX 4 Width / Fit
Test results
SFX 4 91.9 mm
Average 92.8 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
87.4 mm
Width / Fit
97.5 mm

Toebox width

We immediately noticed that the SFX 4's gel cast looked more rounded than usual, and measured its big-toe area width at an above-average 72.4 mm. That makes it one of the few tennis shoes we've tested that proved to have a wide toebox.

But would we opt for a half size or even a full size smaller than our usual size as the brand recommends? Only if we had narrow feet or preferred a snugger, more performance-oriented fit.

Babolat SFX 4 Toebox width
Test results
SFX 4 72.4 mm
Average 69.3 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
65.5 mm
Toebox width
74.3 mm

Toebox height

Even with its large toe bumper and protective toebox overlays, the shoe still provides a generous amount of vertical space.

We measured its toebox height at an ample 26.1 mm.

Babolat SFX 4 Toebox height
Test results
SFX 4 26.1 mm
Average 24.9 mm
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
20.6 mm
Toebox height
29.2 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

The acclaimed Michelin rubber proved its worth in our lab tests yet again, showing an exceptionally high friction coefficient of 1.31 in the Babolat SFX 4. It is, in fact, one of the tackiest blends we've seen among tennis shoes!

We had some of the most confidence-inspiring experiences on the court, as the shoe's grippy outsole kept us planted on hard cuts, push-offs, and full-speed moves.

Test results
SFX 4 1.31
Average 0.78
Compared to 47 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
0.48
Forefoot traction
1.31

Outsole design

The Michelin outsole only covers the shoe's forefoot and heel areas, ensuring grip where it's most needed and saving some weight by not extending to the midfoot.

As an all-court shoe, the SFX 4 features a variation of the herringbone tread pattern with a mix of thinner and wider treadlines for effective grip in multiple directions.

Babolat SFX 4 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

Despite its above-average forefoot stack and sturdy toe box reinforcements, this Babolat shoe remains sufficiently flexible up front.

Babolat SFX 4 forefoot flex

Our lab test confirmed that at 16.4N, it requires just as much force to bend as the average tennis shoe. It's neither too pliable nor impossibly stiff.

The SFX 4 allowed our feet to flex naturally and move freely through quick split steps, lunges, and rapid changes of direction.

Babolat SFX 4 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
SFX 4 16.4N
Average 16.6N
Compared to 48 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
10.1N
Flexible ←→ Stiff
25.0N

Weight

Fair enough; all that extra comfort and cushioning couldn't come without a few extra ounces on the scale.

At 14.2 oz (403g), the Babolat SFX 4 is on the heavier side of tennis shoes, along with the other options in its higher stack height range.

Babolat SFX 4 Weight
Test results
SFX 4 14.2 oz (403g)
Average 12.9 oz (365g)
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
10.7 oz (302g)
Weight
14.7 oz (417g)

Stability

Lateral stability test

Babolat manages to counterbalance its comfort-oriented design with enough stability to prevent any undesirable wobbling.

Its wide base, cradle-like midsole, and sturdy heel counter provide solid stability and containment for side-to-side movements.

Babolat SFX 4 internal straps

Additionally, the shoe packs three internal fabric straps (two on the lateral side and one on the medial side) to enhance midfoot lockdown. The straps connect laces to the base of the shoe for a stronger hold once the laces are cinched.

Torsional rigidity

Although we can't complain about the SFX 4's lateral stability, we also think that it may not provide enough lockdown and support for aggressive movers and hard-hitting baseliners.

The shoe lacks some of that robust torsional rigidity that the flagship stability tennis shoes like the ASICS Resolutions have. In our lab test, we discovered that at 14.5 Nm, it takes 20% less torque to twist this Babolat shoe compared to other tennis shoes.

Babolat SFX 4 Torsional rigidity
Test results
SFX 4 14.5 Nm
Average 18.1 Nm
Compared to 19 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
12.9 Nm
Flexible ←→ Rigid
27.7 Nm

Heel counter stiffness

But on the bright side, the SFX 4 proved extra rigid in the rearfoot, earning the maximum heel counter stiffness score of 5 out of 5.

Structured and well-padded, it minimizes the risk of heel slipping, sliding, and wobbling during intense movement.

Test results
SFX 4 5
Average 4.2
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Babolat relies on an extended forefoot outrigger to compensate for the SFX 4's elevated heel stack.

Measuring its widest point with a caliper, we recorded a whopping 119.5 mm, which is by far the widest forefoot among tennis shoes. It provides plenty of surface area to lean on during forceful lateral movements.

Babolat SFX 4 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
SFX 4 119.5 mm
Average 112.5 mm
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
106.3 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
119.5 mm

Midsole width - heel

The shoe's heel, on the other hand, showed a surprisingly moderate width of 87.2 mm. But we didn't find it alarming, as there is still plenty of landing area in the forefoot.

Babolat SFX 4 Midsole width - heel
Test results
SFX 4 87.2 mm
Average 89.7 mm
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
82.4 mm
Midsole width - heel
99.7 mm

Durability

Toe guard durability

In addition to its raised outsole edges, the Babolat SFX 4 features a large rubberized toe drag guard on the medial side of the forefoot. We must say that's a solid reinforcement for a tennis shoe in this price range!

Babolat SFX 4 toe drag guard

As our Dremel test proved, this combination is highly resistant to abrasion, earning the shoe a solid toe guard durability score of 4 out of 5.

The brand wasn't joking when it referred to this protective toebox design as the bucket seat.

Test results
SFX 4 4
Average 3.5
Compared to 35 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toe guard durability
5

Toebox durability

Reinforcements aside, there is still plenty of exposed mesh on this shoe's upper, and we have to check whether that textile can resist wear and tear as well.

After 12 seconds of drilling the SFX 4's toebox with sandpaper, we saw some reassuring durability.

Test results
SFX 4 3
Average 3.7
Compared to 56 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The woven textile inside the shoe's collar also showed only moderate damage in our Dremel test, keeping the heel padding durability score in the middle range at 3 out of 5.

Test results
SFX 4 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 56 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

The real value for money, however, comes from the shoe's Michelin outsole. The material held up to our Dremel so well during the 22-second test that the dent was barely visible at 0.5 mm!

We don't always see the same results in premium tennis shoes, let alone $100 models!

Test results
SFX 4 0.5 mm
Average 0.8 mm
Compared to 56 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear (Good ←→ Bad)
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Who needs an outsole durability guarantee when you have 4.3 mm of highly durable rubber at a budget-friendly price?

Babolat SFX 4 Outsole thickness
Test results
SFX 4 4.3 mm
Average 4.1 mm
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
3.0 mm
Outsole thickness
5.2 mm

Comfort

Breathability

There is a good reason Babolat left so much of that airy mesh exposed in the SFX 4.

Our smoke-pumping test confirmed that the fabric provides some ventilation and sweat management, but it is only moderately effective, as the plumes passing through the shoe's toebox aren't particularly thick or steady.

Babolat SFX 4 mesh under microscope

This makes the shoe less optimal for summer use but not suffocating, earning a below-average breathability score of 2 out of 5.

Test results
SFX 4 2
Average 3
Compared to 56 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Tongue padding

A padded tongue is listed as part of the shoe's SFX design, and its thickness is no joke! At an impressive 18.9 mm, it is the puffiest tongue we've ever seen in a tennis shoe!

And with the shoe's collar and insole equally generously padded, the step-in feel is nothing short of incredible in this Babolat shoe. Perfect comfort straight out of the box!

Babolat SFX 4 Tongue padding
Test results
SFX 4 18.9 mm
Average 8.8 mm
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
2.5 mm
Tongue padding
18.9 mm

Tongue: gusset type

A semi-gusseted tongue complements the shoe's internal midfoot straps in creating a secure fit.

Babolat SFX 4 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
SFX 4 Both sides (semi)

Insole thickness

With a caliper reading of 7.8 mm, we can confirm that Babolat indeed uses the thickest Ortholite insole in their range. It adds a ton of plush comfort underfoot.

Babolat SFX 4 Insole thickness
Test results
SFX 4 7.8 mm
Average 5.3 mm
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
3.3 mm
Insole thickness
8.5 mm

Removable insole

A closer look at the insole revealed that it's not only thick but also molded to the contours of the foot for added comfort.

We wouldn't recommend replacing it with another insert, though, as you may end up with too much volume inside the shoe and lose the original OrthoLite's comfort benefits.

Test results
SFX 4 Yes

Heel tab

The shoe has no pull tabs or finger loops to help with the on-and-off.

Babolat SFX 4 Heel tab
Test results
SFX 4 None

Misc

Price

We are happy with the amount of value the Babolat SFX 4 offers at such an accessible price point.

Babolat SFX 4 fit
Test results
SFX 4 $109
Average $134
Compared to 57 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
$80
Price
$210