Our verdict

The Xero Shoes HFS II is a minimalist shoe that excels in versatility and comfort. In our testing, we found it performs well across multiple surfaces, from roads to light trails, and even for gym sessions or everyday activities. Its grippy outsole also impressed us proving great traction. However, we found it’s really heavy for its size, which left us with a bittersweet taste.

Pros

  • Anatomical toebox for natural toe splay
  • Real minimalist design
  • Reasonably priced
  • Versatile for roads and light trails
  • Amazing at gym workouts
  • Ultra-flexible and easy to pack
  • Full-length outsole coverage
  • Superior ground feel
  • Promotes feet strength

Cons

  • Midsole lacks energy return
  • Heavier than most minimalist shoes
  • Durability still needs improvements

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

After testing the Xero Shoes HFS II, we found it’s a fantastic choice for:

  • Runners looking for an ultra-flexible, ultra-grounded, ultra-comfortable minimalist shoe. But wait, don’t run an ultra in them!
  • Those seeking a breathable barefoot option for working, walking, and occasional running.
  • Newcomers to the minimalist world who want a well-priced, versatile shoe to start their journey.

Xero Shoes HFS II

Who should NOT buy

The Xero Shoes HFS II lacks arch support and stability features, making it unsuitable for those dealing with pronation or needing even mild support. We think the Altra Paradigm 7 is a better pick for these runners, offering zero-drop geometry combined with exceptional stability.

Additionally, we found the HFS II’s weight to be higher than expected for a minimalist shoe, which some runners may find unjustified, just like we do. For a lighter option, we recommend the Merrell Vapour Glove 6. It offers a real-barefoot design with the added benefit of a Vibram outsole.

Xero Shoes HFS II parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

Minimalist shoes focus on keeping you as close to the ground as possible, and the Xero XFS II excels in this. With only 13.1 mm at the heel, ground feel is fully assured.

Cushioning is minimal, support is nonexistent, and whether you're a heel striker or not, you must rely on your tendons and muscles to thrive without any safety net.

Xero Shoes HFS II Heel stack
Test results
HFS II 13.1 mm
Average 34.1 mm
Compared to 361 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot measures just 12.1 mm—only 1 mm less than the heel—creating a perfectly balanced underfoot feeling.

With just a thin layer of firm rubber separating the ball of your foot and toes from the ground, every stride feels wonderfully natural. In our experience, this barefoot-like sensation it's especially fun when running at faster paces.

Xero Shoes HFS II Forefoot stack
Test results
HFS II 12.1 mm
Average 25.4 mm
Compared to 361 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

The Xero Shoes HFS II is marketed as a zero-drop shoe, and in our experience, it fits that category despite measuring 1.0 mm in the lab. One millimetre is a barely noticeable difference—likely due to manufacturing tolerances or outsole design.

That said, this is the perfect moment to issue a major warning—this shoe requires exceptional foot and Achilles tendon strength. Transitioning too quickly from average daily trainers could lead to major injuries, and we believe that starting gradually is essential for building the strength needed to thrive in the HFS II.

Xero Shoes HFS II Drop
Test results
HFS II 1.0 mm
Average 8.7 mm
Compared to 361 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.8 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The Xero Shoes HFS II, contrary to what it might seem at first sight, does include a midsole. It’s made from Xero’s BareFoam—a firm-as-rock layer that provides a touch of cushioning and support, especially in the midfoot area.

We tested its softness using our durometer and found it measured 49.0 HA—more than twice the average and among the highest results we’ve ever recorded in the lab. For this reason, don’t expect any plush or cloud-soft sensation underfoot. But, isn’t that the point of a minimalist shoe?

Xero Shoes HFS II Midsole softness
Test results
HFS II 49.0 HA
Average 21.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 289 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
41.5 HA

Insole thickness

The insole adds only 3.7 mm of thickness, but it’s remarkably noticeable, as it makes up a significant portion of the cushioning in this minimalist shoe.

Xero Shoes HFS II Insole thickness
Test results
HFS II 3.7 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 357 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Size and fit

Size

We do not have enough votes yet (10+ is required). Please help contribute if you own this shoe, or add votes to other shoes you own.

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

Small True to size Large

Length

In terms of outsole durability, we expected slightly more from the HFS II. A wear of 1.3 mm feels excessive for such hard rubber, but fortunately, the substantial thickness of the outsole prevents any real durability concerns.

Toebox width - widest part

Let’s take a closer look at the toebox. First, we evaluated the vertical space, which is fairly limited compared to a road running shoe. However, this is typical for minimalist options designed to offer a snug, sock-like fit.

Our first measurement in the toebox showed 98.0 mm—a result that might seem underwhelming for a shoe marketed as wide-feet-friendly. In our experience, though, minimalist shoes often follow this pattern: a snug fit around the ball of the foot paired with an anatomic toebox design. And it works.

Xero Shoes HFS II Toebox width - widest part
Test results
HFS II 98.0 mm
Average 98.5 mm
Compared to 362 running shoes
Number of shoes
89.5 mm
Toebox width - widest part
109.1 mm

Toebox width - big toe

As expected, the big toe area is where the toebox truly shines—it tapers only slightly, measuring an impressive 86.7 mm in our second test.

Xero Shoes HFS II pov

This design allows excellent toe splay and provides ample space for those with wide feet. Therefore, this is a case where taking two measurements is absolutely essential to understand the shoe's fit. If we had taken only one, it might seem like this shoe isn’t suitable for wide feet, and it's actually the opposite.

Xero Shoes HFS II Toebox width - big toe
Test results
HFS II 86.7 mm
Average 78.3 mm
Compared to 236 running shoes
Number of shoes
60.4 mm
Toebox width - big toe
92.5 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

One of the defining features of minimalist shoes is that they essentially say, “Hey, you’re on your own.” This means no stability-enhancing elements—no midsole sidewalls, medial posts, rockered soles, or heel bevels. Instead, you get a flat sole, leaving your feet to handle everything, and whether that’s good or bad depends entirely on you and your preferences.

Torsional rigidity

Despite being a minimalist shoe, the Xero Shoes HFS II didn’t score 1/5 on our manual scale but achieved a 2/5.

In our view, this is due to its full-length rubber outsole and thin midsole, which add a touch of subtle rigidity. While these elements slightly stiffen the shoe, we found the difference to be barely noticeable while walking or running.

Test results
HFS II 2
Average 3.3
Compared to 340 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The HFS II doesn’t include a rigid heel piece like average daily trainers. Instead, it features a thick, structured upper that, in our opinion, provides a secure heel lockdown. We tested it and gave it a 3/5 for its balanced design.

Test results
HFS II 3
Average 2.9
Compared to 324 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

In our experience, shoe designs often mislead—whether due to materials, the absence of ventilation holes, or deceptive design. That’s why we trust our smoke-pumping machine, which rigorously tests the upper’s performance.

After testing, we found that the Xero Shoes HFS II excels in ventilation, earning a top-notch 5/5 for breathability.

Once we removed the smoke machine, we examined the upper under a light to pinpoint its most ventilated areas. It was clear that Xero used an ultra-breathable mesh paired with strategically thicker sections to enhance durability and structure, effectively wrapping the foot.

Xero Shoes HFS II microscope

Using a microscope, we confirmed the upper is made of a dual-layer engineered mesh—a common design we’ve seen in many shoes here in the lab. And there’s a good reason for this material choice—it’s cost-effective, highly ventilated, and offers good durability.

Xero Shoes HFS II mesh

Contrary to the shoe’s minimalist appearance, the upper provides impressive comfort, particularly in the tongue and heel areas.

We believe this added padding contributes to the shoe’s slightly heavier weight, but could be a valuable trade-off for those seeking the HFS II for all-day comfort and extended wear.

Xero Shoes HFS II Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
HFS II 106.6 mm
Average 114.1 mm
Compared to 362 running shoes
Number of shoes
100.5 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
127.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel is notably narrow, which aligns perfectly with the principles of minimalist shoe design. Landing on this area in a zero-drop shoe isn’t ideal, and the 79.9 mm width—reminiscent of road competition shoes—makes perfect sense for the HFS II.

Xero Shoes HFS II Midsole width - heel
Test results
HFS II 79.9 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 362 running shoes
Number of shoes
74.9 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

At 10.5N, the Xero HFS II is impressively flexible, promoting a natural-feeling stride whether walking or running. We’re convinced that a higher result would have undermined this model’s purpose, so it’s a relief for fans of minimalism.

By the way, did you know that the HFS stands for "Highly Flexible Shoe"? It’s a simple yet perfectly descriptive name.

Test results
HFS II 10.5N
Average 28.4N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 344 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Stiffness
94.4N

Weight

If there’s one area where we believe Xero Shoes could really improve the HFS series, it’s the weight. In our view, it’s surprising that this shoe weighs 8.6 oz or 244g—the same as the Nike Pegasus Plus, a comfort-packed, well-cushioned daily trainer.

Sure, the shoe’s full rubber coverage across the outsole, combined with its reinforced upper, adds noticeable heft. While these durability-focused features have their merits, the result is a shoe that feels unnecessarily heavy for its size. In our opinion, a weight of 6 or 7 oz would be far more reasonable for a minimalist model like this.

Xero Shoes HFS II Weight
Test results
HFS II 8.61 oz (244g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 362 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.26 oz (149g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

In our experience, shoe designs often mislead—whether due to materials, the absence of ventilation holes, or deceptive design. That’s why we trust our smoke-pumping machine, which rigorously tests the upper’s performance.

After testing, we found that the Xero Shoes HFS II excels in ventilation, earning a top-notch 5/5 for breathability.

Once we removed the smoke machine, we examined the upper under a light to pinpoint its most ventilated areas. It was clear that Xero used an ultra-breathable mesh paired with strategically thicker sections to enhance durability and structure, effectively wrapping the foot.

Xero Shoes HFS II microscope

Using a microscope, we confirmed the upper is made of a dual-layer engineered mesh—a common design we’ve seen in many shoes here in the lab. And there’s a good reason for this material choice—it’s cost-effective, highly ventilated, and offers good durability.

Xero Shoes HFS II mesh

Contrary to the shoe’s minimalist appearance, the upper provides impressive comfort, particularly in the tongue and heel areas.

We believe this added padding contributes to the shoe’s slightly heavier weight, but could be a valuable trade-off for those seeking the HFS II for all-day comfort and extended wear.

Test results
HFS II 5
Average 3.8
Compared to 291 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

After testing the Xero Shoes HFS II with the Dremel, we have no major concerns about toebox durability. A 3/5 may not be a top-tier result, but it’s sufficient for everyday use, especially with the reinforced toecap.

Test results
HFS II 3
Average 2.5
Compared to 225 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

On the other hand, we were disappointed by the heel padding. In our testing, it earned a poor 1/5 due to its soft, comfort-focused lining, which, while plush and cosy, proved to be unexpectedly fragile.

Test results
HFS II 1
Average 3.2
Compared to 221 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

Moving to the outsole, we found a highly durable rubber compound (92.5 HC) that strikes a balance between road and trail shoes. The design incorporates arrow-shaped lugs in the forefoot and midfoot areas, paired with a completely different pattern in the centre and heel.

Xero Shoes HFS II outsole

This versatile configuration is designed to enhance traction, particularly on dirt roads and light trails, though a road-focused outsole would likely provide superior performance for runners sticking to pavement.

Xero Shoes HFS II Outsole hardness
Test results
HFS II 92.5 HC
Average 80.0 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 342 running shoes
Number of shoes
52.1 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

In terms of outsole durability, we expected slightly more from the HFS II. A wear of 1.3 mm feels excessive for such hard rubber, but fortunately, the substantial thickness of the outsole prevents any real durability concerns.

Test results
HFS II 1.3 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 203 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

And here it is: a hefty 4.5 mm outsole that surpasses most running shoes on the market. While unusual for a minimalist shoe, it compensates for the lack of a protective midsole, providing extra shielding against small rocks and sharp elements. That said, this added thickness increases the shoe's weight, making it a bit of a trade-off.

Xero Shoes HFS II Outsole thickness
Test results
HFS II 4.5 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 361 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.6 mm

Misc

Price

It might seem counterintuitive that minimalist shoes can sometimes cost more than regular running shoes despite using less material. However, this is common, and some barefoot shoes even reach prices nearing £200.

We believe the Xero HFS II is reasonably priced. It checks most of the boxes for minimalist enthusiasts, and the quality of its materials is solid and satisfactory.

Test results
HFS II $120
Compared to 362 running shoes
Number of shoes
£45
Price
£300

Reflective elements

Discovering some sleek reflective elements was unexpected, but it’s a fantastic bonus!

Test results
HFS II Yes

Tongue padding

The HFS II features a mixed lacing system that combines classic eyelets with lace loops, offering a secure and effective way to cinch down the round laces. Additionally, it includes an extra eyelet closer to the ankle.

Xero Shoes HFS II laces

At 5.8 mm, the tongue is generously padded, delivering excellent comfort with no issues from our perspective. However, those prioritising a lighter shoe might not appreciate this design choice as much.

Test results
HFS II 5.8 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 359 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue isn’t gusseted, but in minimalist shoes, this is somewhat expected. And thanks to its snug fit and low-volume upper, the tongue stays securely in place even without being fixed to the sides.

Xero Shoes HFS II Tongue: gusset type
Test results
HFS II None

Heel tab

This shoe isn’t just minimalist due to its low stack height and zero drop—it also embodies this philosophy with the absence of a heel tab, a feature you can easily live without.

Xero Shoes HFS II Heel tab
Test results
HFS II None

Removable insole

Those looking to fully embrace minimalism can remove the insole, making the HFS II even thinner and closer to the ground. However, we advise against running on anything other than roads or super-smooth trails without the sockliner.

Xero Shoes HFS II Removable insole
Test results
HFS II Yes