Our verdict
Pros
- Built-to-last outsole
- Stable ride for neutral runners
- Comfortable upper with plush padding
- Great for walking
- Reliable grip on dry surfaces
- All-around reflectivity
- Affordable price
Cons
- Poor breathability
- Firm midsole
- Narrow toebox limits toe splay
- Lacks energy return
Audience verdict
- Top 25% in Under Armour running shoes
Comparison
The most similar running shoes compared
+ + Add a shoe | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audience score | N/A | 79 Decent! | 87 Great! | 80 Good! | |
Price | £105 | £60 | £110 | £75 | |
Pace | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running | |
Arch support | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | |
Weight lab Weight brand | 10.1 oz / 286g 9.9 oz / 281g | 9.3 oz / 264g 10 oz / 283g | 9 oz / 254g 9.4 oz / 266g | 9.6 oz / 273g 10.4 oz / 295g | |
Drop lab Drop brand | 7.0 mm 8.0 mm | 9.6 mm 8.0 mm | 6.0 mm 8.0 mm | 9.1 mm | |
Strike pattern | Mid/forefoot | HeelMid/forefoot | Mid/forefoot | HeelMid/forefoot | |
Size | - | Slightly small | True to size | True to size | |
Midsole softness | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced | |
Difference in midsole softness in cold | Small | Normal | Small | Normal | |
Toebox durability | Decent | Decent | Bad | - | |
Heel padding durability | Decent | Bad | Decent | - | |
Outsole durability | Good | Decent | Good | - | |
Breathability | Warm | Moderate | Warm | Moderate | |
Toebox width at the widest part | - | Medium | Medium | Medium | |
Toebox width at the big toe | - | Medium | Medium | Narrow | |
Stiffness | Flexible | Flexible | Flexible | Flexible | |
Difference in stiffness in cold | Small | Normal | Small | Big | |
Torsional rigidity | Stiff | Moderate | Flexible | Moderate | |
Heel counter stiffness | Moderate | Moderate | Flexible | Flexible | |
Heel lab Heel brand | 30.2 mm 32.0 mm | 30.8 mm 30.0 mm | 30.2 mm 27.0 mm | 29.8 mm | |
Forefoot lab Forefoot brand | 23.2 mm 24.0 mm | 21.2 mm 22.0 mm | 24.2 mm 19.0 mm | 20.7 mm | |
Widths available | NormalWide | NormalX-Wide | Normal | Normal | |
Orthotic friendly | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Season | All seasons | All seasons | All seasons | All seasons | |
Removable insole | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Ranking | #238 Bottom 22% | #283 Bottom 8% | #151 Top 49% | #267 Bottom 13% | |
Popularity | #226 Bottom 26% | #250 Bottom 19% | #222 Bottom 28% | #142 Top 46% |
Who should buy
We believe that the Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 is a great option for:
- Runners seeking a shoe with a long-lasting outsole and a comfort-focused upper at a reasonable price.
- Beginners wanting a firm, stable ride for their first running shoe.
- Weekend warriors needing a reliable pick for easy runs and long walks.
Who should NOT buy
We believe that runners seeking a plush ride at a budget-friendly price will be disappointed with the HOVR Sonic 6. Its firm midsole lacks the soft feel found in shoes like the Nike Winflo 11, which offers a more pleasant underfoot feel while maintaining strong value.
Additionally, we think the midsole stack height may be a bit thin by today’s standards, which may not provide enough protection for heavier runners. If you're looking for a highly-cushioned yet affordable alternative, the ASICS Gel Pulse 15 and the Saucony Axon 3 are far better options for you.
Cushioning
Heel stack
When we measured the midsole, we found a 30.2 mm stack height in the heel. While this might not match today’s ultra-high trends, it still provides a good level of impact absorption.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 30.2 mm |
Average | 34.1 mm |
Forefoot stack
The forefoot sits below average at 23.2 mm—sufficient for short, easy runs but likely lacking for longer sessions. That said, we believe this isn’t a major drawback, as the shoe isn’t designed for extended distances anyway.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 23.2 mm |
Average | 25.5 mm |
Drop
Through our evaluation, we measured an actual drop of 7.0 mm from heel to forefoot—slightly lower than the advertised 8 mm by Under Armour.
In our view, this moderate offset provides a well-balanced ride that accommodates various footstrikes, though it feels slightly less beginner-friendly than the higher drop geometries we typically see in cheap running shoes.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 7.0 mm |
Average | 8.6 mm |
Midsole softness
The Under Armour HOVR Sonic 6 boasts a dual-density midsole, combining two different foams. The primary blue layer is in the heel and midfoot, while the secondary white layer is placed in the forefoot.
Pressing our durometer against the main layer of UA HOVR foam gave us an average reading of 27.0 HA. That’s on the firmer side, and in our experience, it translated into a dense underfoot feel with minimal give.
For runners craving a plush, pillow-like ride, this shoe won’t deliver. Instead, it’s designed for those who appreciate a secure platform.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 27.0 HA |
Average | 20.9 HA |
Secondary foam softness
We tested the secondary foam layer and recorded a firm 30.0 HA on our durometer—an exceptionally high result. In our view, Under Armour likely chose this firmer EVA material to offset the lower stack height in the forefoot.
It's also worth noting that, being a basic EVA formulation, high energy return is simply out of the equation. We found that the shoe lacks the lively bounce found in more advanced foam technologies.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 30.0 HA |
Average | 24.0 HA |
Midsole softness in cold (%)
After placing the shoe in the freezer for 20 minutes, the midsole only became 8% firmer. That's quite good for an EVA-based foam, although it's heavily influenced by the fact that this foam is not plush at all.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 8% |
Average | 25% |
Insole thickness
We found the insole to be slightly thinner than average at 3.6 mm, which aligns well with this shoe’s modest stack height.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 3.6 mm |
Average | 4.4 mm |
Rocker
Unlike many modern running shoes, we found that Under Armour stuck with a classic, non-rockered profile for the HOVR Sonic 6, opting for a more traditional shape that works well for easy running and walking alike.
This was clear from the start, but we confirmed it by measuring the toe spring.

Size and fit
Size
We do not have enough votes yet (10+ is required). Please help contribute if you own this shoe, or add votes to other shoes you own.
Toebox width - widest part
How does the HOVR Sonic 6 fit? When we first slipped our feet in, we found it snug—definitely not on the roomier side. To get precise numbers, we turned to our signature gel mould test.
After solidifying in the fridge, the mould revealed a 94.2 mm measurement—slightly narrower than what we typically record in the lab.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 94.2 mm |
Average | 95.6 mm |
Toebox width - big toe
Our second measurement in the big toe area showed a pronounced taper at 71.1 mm, reinforcing that this shoe is best suited for narrower feet. And we can confirm that it won't accommodate wide-footed runners comfortably.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 71.1 mm |
Average | 73.5 mm |
Toebox height
We also measured the toebox height, a crucial factor for runners needing extra vertical space. At 27.2 mm, the HOVR Sonic 6 falls within the average range, providing sufficient clearance without causing any fit issues.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 27.2 mm |
Average | 27.1 mm |
Stability
Lateral stability test
In our view, one of the standout advantages of the HOVR Sonic 6 is its great stability, even without a wide platform. The blend of firm foam and a huge plastic heel cup works really well especially for heel strikers needing extra support.
Torsional rigidity
Another stability boost comes from the shoe’s high torsional rigidity, which we rated 4/5. That’s impressively firm for a daily trainer, adding extra support for those who need a more structured ride.
HOVR Sonic 6 | 4 |
Average | 3.4 |
Heel counter stiffness
The heel counter sits at a moderate 3/5 stiffness, aligning with most neutral running shoes. Given the firm midsole and torsionally rigid build, additional reinforcement in this area wasn’t necessary for stability.
HOVR Sonic 6 | 3 |
Average | 2.9 |
Midsole width - forefoot
With a narrow 107.0 mm forefoot, this shoe is better suited for runners who don’t need extra width rather than those who prefer maximalist designs.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 107.0 mm |
Average | 114.1 mm |
Midsole width - heel
The heel maintains the same narrow design at 86.7 mm. Instead of widening the base, Under Armour focused on adding rigidity and a firmer underfoot feel to ensure adequate stability for neutral runners.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 86.7 mm |
Average | 90.7 mm |
Flexibility / Stiffness
While it offers notable torsional rigidity, its longitudinal flexibility stands out, making it a solid choice for daily wear or even as a walking shoe.
Bending it to 90 degrees required just 19.6N of force.
HOVR Sonic 6 | 19.6N |
Average | 28.1N |
Weight
When it comes to weight, we believe Under Armour could make some improvements. Considering the cushioning level of the HOVR Sonic 6, its 10.10 oz (286g) build feels somewhat excessive even for a shoe in this budget-friendly category. However, it's not quite bad enough to be a dealbreaker.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 10.09 oz (286g) |
Average | 9.38 oz (266g) |
Breathability
Upon unboxing the HOVR Sonic 6, we observed the presence of ventilation holes in the upper. However, some inner layer seemed to obstruct them, raising concerns about their effectiveness. To assess this, we conducted our standard smoke test.
Regrettably, the test revealed limited airflow, leading us to assign a 2/5 ventilation score. While this design may not be ideal for summer runs, individuals in cooler climates might appreciate the added warmth.
Our digital microscope analysis confirmed that the mesh is on the thicker side and that the ventilation holes present throughout the midfoot and heel are not fully open due to a secondary black layer.
Despite these ventilation shortcomings, we must say that, for a budget-friendly shoe, the upper offers impressive comfort.
In fact, many runners might find the trade-off between reduced breathability and enhanced cosiness acceptable.
HOVR Sonic 6 | 2 |
Average | 3.8 |
Durability
Toebox durability
We put the upper through our rigorous Dremel test. The result? A respectable 3/5 score—outlasting many running shoes in its price range.
HOVR Sonic 6 | 3 |
Average | 2.5 |
Heel padding durability
On the downside, we found the heel padding to be quite underwhelming, scoring just 2/5.
While this might not be a real issue for most runners, those prone to wearing down this area should consider more durability-focused options readily available in the market.
HOVR Sonic 6 | 2 |
Average | 3.2 |
Outsole hardness
The outsole incorporates a "High Abrasion Rubber" compound that, while not the grippiest we’ve tested, performed as expected given its firm 89.0 HC durometer reading. This isn’t surprising for a budget-friendly shoe, where longevity often takes precedence over traction.
Coverage is quite extensive, with most areas well-protected except for a small section on the medial side. However, we believe that this is not a concern, as the design still ensures reliable wear resistance across high-wear zones.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 89.0 HC |
Average | 79.9 HC |
Outsole durability
We tested the rubber with our Dremel and discovered outstanding durability—just 0.5 mm of wear!
HOVR Sonic 6 | 0.5 mm |
Average | 1.0 mm |
Outsole thickness
We had been wondering why this shoe felt heavier than expected, and after testing, we found the main reason—Under Armour opted for an ultra-thick 4.5 mm rubber outsole, which is significantly above average.
The upside is obvious—this outsole is built to withstand countless miles. However, the trade-off is a noticeably firmer underfoot feel and added weight. In our opinion, a slightly thinner rubber layer—somewhere between 2.5 and 3.5 mm—would have struck a better balance between durability and weight.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 4.5 mm |
Average | 3.2 mm |
Misc
Price
For runners who enjoy a firm, stable ride and don’t prioritize energy return, we believe the HOVR Sonic 6 offers solid value with its long-lasting outsole and comfort-driven upper. However, we also think that some of its drawbacks are significant enough that, regardless of price, it simply won’t work for everyone.
HOVR Sonic 6 | $100 |
Reflective elements
The HOVR Sonic 6 boasts full 360-degree reflectivity.
While many shoes lack any reflective elements, this one outshines even several high-end models across major brands, making it a superb choice for running in low-light conditions.
HOVR Sonic 6 | Yes |
Tongue padding
We found a straightforward lacing system with punched eyelets that does the job well, featuring an extra eyelet for those wanting a more locked-in feel around the ankle. There's also a much-needed tongue loop to keep everything securely in place and prevent unwanted shifting.
One of the standout features of the HOVR Sonic 6 is its ultra-plush tongue, which we absolutely loved. With 9.8 mm of thick padding, it delivers a comfort-driven feel over the instep.

HOVR Sonic 6 | 9.8 mm |
Average | 5.8 mm |
Tongue: gusset type
At this price point, a gusseted tongue would be a welcome addition, but in our experience, shoes like the HOVR Sonic 6 rarely include one. As expected, the tongue isn’t fixed to the sides here either.

HOVR Sonic 6 | None |
Heel tab
We found no heel tab on the HOVR Sonic 6, but slipping our feet in was effortless. In our experience, the design works fine without it. However, a cool-looking pull tab in v7 wouldn’t hurt.

HOVR Sonic 6 | None |
Removable insole
We found the insole easily replaceable, and in our experience, it’s a basic insert with average comfort—nothing worth holding onto if you prefer an upgrade.

HOVR Sonic 6 | Yes |