Salomon Supercross 4 review

In our opinion, the Salomon Supercross 4 is an excellent choice for:

• Heel strikers who have a neutral gait and are in search of a trail shoe with a significant heel-to-toe drop.
• Loyal Salomon fans seeking a trail shoe with a softer midsole than most of their models.
• Outdoor enthusiasts who often run and sometimes hike in muddy or snowy conditions and need a shoe with reliable traction for these environments.

We determined that the Salomon Supercross 4 might not be the ideal pick for heel strikers with stability concerns, mainly due to its extremely narrow heel.

For runners in this category, a trail shoe with a broader heel, like the Hoka Mafate Speed 4, could be a better option, especially since it also does a great job on technical terrain.

Furthermore, our analysis revealed that the Supercross 4 is not quite suited for midfoot and forefoot strikers. The shoe's forefoot area is quite thin, and it features a significantly high heel-to-toe drop. For those seeking a more balanced cushioning, we suggest considering the Saucony Peregrine 13.

In the heel, we measured a stack height of 35.1 mm, indicating an great amount of cushioning underfoot. This is particularly beneficial for heel strikers, who make up the majority of runners.

The generous cushioning ensures comfort and impact protection even during long runs but only if you strike the ground with the heel.

However, the forefoot of the shoe is extremely thin. With a meagre thickness of only 19.9 mm, it falls short for long-distance running, especially for forefoot or midfoot strikers.

The thick outsole further compounds the issue by leaving very little foam for cushioning, as you can see in the picture below.

As you might have inferred from our earlier measurements, the heel-to-toe drop in this wedge-shaped shoe is BRUTAL.

With a staggering offset of 15.2 mm, it ranks as one of the most pronounced we've encountered in the lab.

Salomon typically caters to fans of firm midsoles, so our durometer reading of 19.3 HA taken directly on the EnergyCell foam was a surprise in the lab.

It indicates a more balanced midsole—neither plush and cloud-like nor overly firm. Expect a ride that strikes a comfortable middle ground.

To gauge the shoe's performance in cold temperatures, we placed it in our freezer for 20 minutes, then conducted our standard procedure of four consecutive durometer tests for accuracy.

Post-freezing, the shoe registered at 23.6 HA.

With only a 22.6% increase, it's clear that the shoe maintains its feel, ensuring that winter runs won't pose any significant changes in cushioning.

The insole measures a fairly standard 4.0 mm. However, it's worth mentioning that it's an Ortholite insole, which is a notable inclusion for a mid-range Salomon shoe, rather than a top-tier model. 

Salomon, famous for its snug-fitting, performance-focused uppers, led us to expect a narrower fit.

However, measuring a generous 99.5 mm in the widest part of the toebox, the Supercross 4 pleasantly surprised us with its unexpectedly spacious design.

When we checked the big toe area of the shoe, we encountered a disappointment. The measurement came to just 71.2 mm, which means there's not much space for your toes to move freely.

If having plenty of room for toe splay is important to you, we recommend considering other options, such as the New Balance Fresh Foam X Hierro V7.

The Supercross 4 doesn't primarily focus on stability, so it's best not to anticipate a supportive ride.

That said, we found its performance satisfactory in multiple terrains, particularly in forefoot landings, though it was less impressive in the heel.

Upon testing the torsional rigidity by twisting the shoe, we discovered it was surprisingly flexible!

Scoring just a 2/5 on our scale, this flexibility enhances comfort and proves advantageous when going through tight corners.

The heel counter also exhibits considerable flexibility, contributing to the shoe's less stable feel in the rearfoot area. We assigned it a similar flexibility rating of 2/5.

When we first unboxed the shoe in the lab, it was evident that it followed Salomon's classic narrow design. To confirm this, we took ultra-precise measurements in the lab.

The maximum width of the forefoot measured 112.5 mm, aligning with the average width for trail running shoes.

Despite its purpose for blazing-fast cornering, at just 85.7 mm, the heel is very narrow and compromises its stability.

This design choice seems really weird with the substantial heel-to-toe drop of this shoe, which targets heel strikers.

In our longitudinal flexibility test, which involves bending the shoe to a 90-degree angle, we discovered that just 17.5N of force was required to reach the desired point.

This low score signals the shoe's exceptional flexibility, making it extremely comfortable for both walking and hiking. And its impressive flexibility in all directions can be largely attributed to the absence of a rock plate.

We did the same experiment as with the cushioning—20 minutes at freezing temps and then re-measured the shoe. This time, the stiffness test delivered a 21.5N result.

That's just a 22.9% increase, an impressive achievement for this midsole ensuring that, regardless of the cold weather out there, the Supercross 4 won't feel like a brick underfoot.

We found that the Salomon Supercross 4 disappointingly tips the scales at a hefty 11.1 oz (315g), making it far from a lightweight option.

Surprisingly, it's even heavier than its big sibling, the Speedcross 6, despite having less foam underfoot. This added weight could be a drawback for those seeking an agile trail running experience.

The Supercross 4's upper initially didn't seem promising in terms of breathability due to its lack of visible ventilation holes. This set our expectations quite low as we began our lab testing.

However, the shoe managed to deliver a surprise during our smoke test, scoring a respectable 3 out of 5. This was a notably better result than we had anticipated, hinting at some breathability potential despite the initial impression.

In the next phase of our assessment, we moved to examining the shoe under a strong light. Although the shoe lacks big ventilation holes, we observed some extra-small glimpses of light passing through it.

This indicated that some air could make its way through the upper, which explained the average-at-best breathability score we observed in the smoke test.

To delve deeper into the upper's structure, we turned to the microscope for a closer inspection.

Here, we discovered an ultra-thin mesh characterised by tiny gaps. These gaps were the pathways for air to escape, but their minuscule size was so limiting that they were barely visible even under microscopic examination.

Our final step involved a manual check of the mesh for elasticity. This would help us understand if breathability might improve with use as the material stretched. However, we found no elasticity in the mesh, leading to the conclusion that the breathability of the Supercross 4 is unlikely to increase over time.

With shoes that typically have subpar durability, we often hope for better results, so we eagerly fired up the Dremel for our rigorous test.

Fortunately, the Salomon exceeded our expectations thanks to its protective layer, impressively earning a 4 out of 5 in this challenging test. This remarkable performance places the shoe among the most durable we've ever evaluated in our lab.

But hold on, because the shoe continues to impress in the durability department. It's not just good in the toebox, but also excels in the heel area.

When we subjected the heel to our back-to-back Dremel test, the results in our lab were unanimous—a perfect 5 out of 5. This performance makes the Supercross 4 a standout choice for those who value long-lasting wear in this area.

Shifting our focus to the outsole, we were keen to see if Salomon also mastered durability with its Contagrip rubber.

Our first step was to assess the rubber's hardness. The result was a fairly average 86.0 HC. 

For the last durability test, we brought out our Dremel for the third round.

The outcome was a mere 0.7-mm indentation on the lug, once again demonstrating exceptional durability!

With an impressive 2.5-mm thickness in the outsole, you can be absolutely assured that if you ever switch from these shoes, it won't be due to wear and tear in this area.

The robust Contagrip rubber guarantees long-lasting performance across all terrains.

Designed for technical trails and steep descents on loose terrain, the 4.2-mm lug depth of the Supercross 4 seems the right choice. While it might struggle slightly in the toughest mud and snow conditions, this outsole works great in most scenarios.

Most of the Contagrip outsole's lugs are chevron-shaped and strategically positioned for enhanced traction, truly make a difference.

We didn't expected this one. Salomon chose to forgo reflective elements in a shoe designed for adventures.

The tongue of the Supercross 4, measuring 7.0 mm, offers ample padding—perhaps a tad more than necessary given the shoe's weight.

Nonetheless, this thickness means excellent news for those who often experience discomfort in the instep area, as it ensures added comfort.

The absence of a gusseted tongue in the Supercross 4 is disappointing, especially for a trail running shoe. But it's important to remember, this isn't a high-end model for Salomon, so some premium elements might be missing.

The Supercross 4 features a handy pull tab in the Achilles area, making it a breeze to slip your feet into the shoe.

The insole in the Supercross 4 is removable, allowing for easy replacement if necessary. Bear in mind that not all Salomon shoes allow for this possibility.

Also, as previously mentioned, the insole it's made by Ortholite, an American brand known for its eco-friendly and moisture-wicking insoles.