Our verdict

85
Great
  • Urban 76
  • Speed 82
  • Day hiking 88
  • Backpacking 60
The Danner Trail 2650 GTX proved its comfort-oriented design in our lab, showing a great balance of high shock absorption, durable construction, and moderate weight. And this is exactly the mix you want when thru-hiking a route like the Pacific Crest Trail! No wonder the shoe is named after its total mileage! It's not the cheapest option, unfortunately, and its snug fit brings some limitations, but it can be an excellent hiking companion if you can get past these drawbacks.

Pros

  • One of the lightest GTX hiking shoes
  • Great shock absorption
  • Comfortable step-in feel
  • High-quality suede upper
  • Excellent grip on mixed terrain
  • Stable for moderate hikes
  • Protective rock plate

Cons

  • Not for wide feet
  • Steep heel-to-toe drop
  • A bit overpriced

Awards

Who should buy

We believe that the Danner Trail 2650 GTX is right up your alley if:

  • you expect sneaker-like comfort in your hiking shoes
  • you need high shock absorption for long hikes on moderate terrain
  • you want a durable leather shoe that weighs lighter than average

Danner Trail 2650 GTX review

Who should NOT buy

Its high price may deter some people from choosing the Trail 2650 GTX. But luckily, there are other well-cushioned waterproof options that accommodate long adventures on mixed terrain, like the HOKA Anacapa 2 Low GTX (a bit heavier, though) and the Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX (with a synthetic upper instead).

And if you are after a more stability-focused shoe for technical routes, the same price range can get you much more structured options like the La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II GTX and the La Sportiva Spire GTX.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX lab test

Cushioning

Shock absorption

At 118 SA in the heel, the Danner Trail 2650 GTX offers enough shock absorption to reduce fatigue and joint stress, even during longer hikes.

While it shows a slightly lower result than its non-waterproof counterpart (124 SA), this Danner shoe remains one of the better-cushioned hiking shoes in our lab. The Gore-Tex membrane is most likely responsible for this minor difference, as it adds structure to the shoe.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Shock absorption heel
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 118 SA
Average 107 SA
Compared to 30 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
85 SA
Shock absorption
133 SA

Energy return

Made of basic EVA foam, the Trail 2650 GTX's midsole has no tangible rebound. With a below-average energy return of 43.8%, it offers more of a static, yet stable and controlled, ride.

Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 43.8%
Average 49.6%
Compared to 30 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
42.0%
Energy return
57.0%

Heel stack

At 35.2 mm on our calliper, this Danner shoe's heel stack falls at the higher end of the hiking shoe category. It's not as towering as some HOKA shoes (40+ mm!), but surely tall enough to buffer the sticks and stones.

P.S. A layer of waterproofing raises the platform 2 mm above the non-GTX version.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Heel stack
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 35.2 mm
Average 33.0 mm
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
22.0 mm
Heel stack
40.5 mm

Forefoot stack

Its forefoot stack, on the other hand, is more on par with the average at 20.3 mm. That puts the ball of the foot sufficiently close to the ground for stability and control.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Forefoot stack
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 20.3 mm
Average 22.0 mm
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
10.7 mm
Forefoot stack
31.0 mm

Drop

The notable difference in its stack heights is reflected in the shoe's whopping 14.9 mm drop. That's significantly taller than the officially stated 8 mm and the category average.

Although it offers added cushioning in the heel and reduced stress on the Achilles and calves, it can feel way too elevated on descents and uneven terrain. The forward pitch is just too tangible and is likely to result in some undesirable toe jamming and heel slipping.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Drop
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 14.9 mm
Average 11.0 mm
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Drop
16.0 mm

Midsole softness

Updated
Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

Pressing our durometer against the shoe's primary midsole foam, we got a balanced reading of 39.7 AC.

Slightly softer than average, it makes the ride a bit more forgiving than that of a typical hiking shoe, but still far from plush or mushy. That's in part because the rock plate adds firmness to the platform.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Midsole softness
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 39.7 AC
Average 45.4 AC
Compared to 24 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
31.8 AC
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
60.0 AC

Rock plate

A Trailguard shank takes up almost the entire length of this Danner shoe's sole. It is made of rigid yet lightweight TPU, protecting the foot from trail debris while adding torsional stiffness for side-to-side stability.

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
Danner Trail 2650 GTX Internal length
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 270.8 mm
Average 268.9 mm
Compared to 21 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
262.9 mm
Internal length
275.9 mm

Width / Fit

Using special liquid, we created a one-to-one gel replica of the shoe's interiors to see how it measures up against the average.

And much like its non-waterproof counterpart, the Danner Trail 2650 GTX fits on the narrow side. Showing only 91.6 mm between the most extended points of its ball-of-foot area, it borders on medium and narrow.

But, thankfully, this Danner shoe is also available in a wide width, offering more space for those who need it.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Width / Fit
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 91.6 mm
Average 93.9 mm
Compared to 33 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
89.9 mm
Width / Fit
99.9 mm

Toebox width

Although its toebox shape is not critically tapered, it showed a narrower measurement on our calliper as well. It can feel a bit restrictive with a moderate width of 70.7 mm in the big toe area.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Toebox width
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 70.7 mm
Average 72.2 mm
Compared to 33 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
67.3 mm
Toebox width
80.5 mm

Toebox height

Hikers with toe deformities like hammertoes or toenail concerns are less likely to feel comfortable in the Trail 2650 GTX.

That's because its vertical space proved to be quite limited with a low toebox height of only 23.6 mm.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Toebox height
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 23.6 mm
Average 27.5 mm
Compared to 33 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
21.8 mm
Toebox height
35.4 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

This section is a work in progress

Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 0.65
Average 0.66
Compared to 6 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
0.56
Forefoot traction
0.76

Lug depth

This Danner shoe feels most at home on moderate terrain with a mix of gravel, light dirt, sand, grass, roots, and occasional rocks and boulders you may encounter on a singletrack or a forest trail.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX outsole

Its Vibram 460 MegaGrip outsole is studded with average-sized lugs (3.8 mm deep), offering good bite on various surfaces without feeling too sharp on hard-packed trails and city streets.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Lug depth
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 3.8 mm
Average 3.9 mm
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
2.1 mm
Lug depth
4.9 mm

Outsole design

The shoe's 'self-adapting lugs,' as the brand calls them, become more aggressive and triangular in the heel and forefoot to provide stronger grip on ascents and descents.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

When we say that waterproofing can add rigidity to the shoe's construction, we mean it can almost double the shoe's stiffness!

Danner Trail 2650 GTX forefoot flex

Measuring the force required to bend the Danner Trail 2650 GTX by 30 degrees, we couldn't believe it took as much as 19.5 N, whereas the non-waterproof shoe needed only 10.4N.

Even though it's not as pliable as the regular version, it is still on par with the category average. It has a decent amount of flex to keep foot transitions comfortable and fluid.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 19.5N
Average 18.8N
Compared to 30 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
10.4N
Flexibility ←→ Stiffness
39.1N

Weight

The waterproofing obviously added some weight to the Trail 2650 GTX, but not enough to exceed the hiking shoe average.

Only 1.4 oz (40g) heavier than the regular Trail 2650, it is still one of the lightest waterproof hiking shoes in our lab.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Weight
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 12.4 oz (352g)
Average 13.4 oz (379g)
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
11.0 oz (312g)
Weight
17.1 oz (486g)

Breathability

Breathability test

The Danner Trail 2650 GTX showed no hint of permeability in our smoke-pumping breathability test. Its fully sealed construction blocks air from entering or leaving the shoe's interior as freely.

A zoomed-in microscope shot of the shoe's fuzzy suede upper showed no perforations or air channels either. 

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Breathability Microscope test

With all that said, we rated this Danner shoe's breathability with the lowest score of 1 out of 5.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Breathability Microscope

Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 1
Average 2.3
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

We were pleased to see that the Gore-Tex version of the Danner Trail 2650 is notably more structured than the regular version. But still, we wouldn't describe it as a stability-first hiking shoe.

It offers enough lateral support for non-technical landscapes and lighter loads.

Torsional rigidity

Updated

The waterproofing elements of the Trail 2650 GTX also add a good amount of torsional rigidity to the shoe's construction.

While the non-GTX shoe required a moderate 15.8 Nm of torque to twist in either direction, the GTX version takes as much as 24% more at 19.6 Nm! That surely contributes to a more secure and surefooted experience in the Danner Trail 2650 GTX.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Torsional rigidity
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 19.6 Nm
Average 18.2 Nm
Compared to 11 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
3.1 Nm
Torsional rigidity
29.6 Nm

Heel counter stiffness

However, the shoe's heel counter stiffness was unaffected in the GTX version, as it scored an equally low 1 out of 5 in our manual test.

Pliable and unstructured, it doesn't hold the rearfoot as securely as some of the other hiking shoes. And the firm EXO Heel cap hardly adds any support at the back. We found it a bit gimmicky, to be honest.

Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 1
Average 3.6
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

As part of the brand's DT-6 last design, the Trail 2650 GTX features an extended forefoot midsole width. Our calliper measurement confirmed it at an above-average 116.7 mm.

This greater surface area contributes to the Danner shoe's groundedness and stability.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 116.7 mm
Average 111.9 mm
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
103.0 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
119.3 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel, however, maintains an average width of 85.2 mm. It is sufficiently stable without feeling too broad or clunky.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Midsole width - heel
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 85.2 mm
Average 88.2 mm
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
79.2 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.3 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

This Danner shoe's suede upper can take a lot of beating before it shows any serious signs of wear or gives up entirely.

Testing the material with sandpaper, we found the damage so minor that we readily gave the Trail 2650 GTX a high toebox durability score of 4 out of 5.

And it's good to see a thick rubberized rand protecting the shoe's toebox from bumps and scratches.

Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 4
Average 3.8
Compared to 32 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Unfortunately, the inner lining of the shoe's heel collar wasn't as promising.

Developing tangible wear and tear in a matter of seconds, it lowered our heel padding durability score to 2 out of 5.

This will most likely be the first area to show deterioration in this Danner shoe.

Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 2
Average 3
Compared to 32 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

We are satisfied with the abrasion resistance of this shoe's rubber outsole. Measuring the dent depth at 0.9 mm, we found it to be equally durable as the average hiking shoe outsole. Albeit, we did expect a slightly better result considering the shoe's high price point.

Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 0.9 mm
Average 0.9 mm
Compared to 32 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

We also found its outsole to be slightly thinner than average at 1.8 mm, adding to long-term durability concerns.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Outsole thickness
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 1.8 mm
Average 2.4 mm
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
1.6 mm
Outsole thickness
4.0 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The Danner Trail 2650 offers a very pleasant step-in feel from the start, making it feel more like a casual sneaker than a sturdy hiking shoe. This is in part thanks to its well-padded OrthoLite Footbed, which measures up to 6.0 mm at the heel.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Insole thickness
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 6.0 mm
Average 5.4 mm
Compared to 37 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
2.6 mm
Insole thickness
8.6 mm

Removable insole

If necessary, the insole can be replaced with a custom orthotic for added support and cushioning. Just be mindful of the shoe's overall snugger fit, which may not accommodate every insert.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Removable insole
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

We kept this Danner shoe in the freezer for 20 minutes to see how its cushioning softness changes at low temperatures. With a 17% difference in our durometer measurement, we found that it went from balanced to firm (46.5 AC). But gladly, not too firm to make it brick-like.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 17%
Average 19%
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
7%
Midsole softness in cold
29%

Reflective elements

The Trail 2650 GTX doesn't have any large reflective components, but some of the threads in its laces and heel pull tab reflect light in the dark.

Test results
Trail 2650 GTX Yes

Tongue padding

We found the shoe's tongue and collar sufficiently padded to prevent pressure and chafing against the skin.

The tongue, in particular, showed 6.4 mm of thickness. It is slightly thinner than average, but just enough to reduce the risk of lace bites.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Tongue padding
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX 6.4 mm
Average 9.9 mm
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
3.1 mm
Tongue padding
17.0 mm

Tongue: gusset type

A fully gusseted tongue complements the shoe's sealed, waterproof construction. It prevents water from seeping inside the shoe.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX Both sides (full)

Heel tab

A woven finger loop at the back of the shoe helps make entry easier.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Heel tab
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX Finger loop

Price

The Danner Trail 2650 GTX offers great value with its high-quality suede upper, rock plate, fantastic comfort, and shock absorption. But we still don't think its high price is fully justified because it doesn't quite match the performance of similarly priced yet more technical shoes.

Danner Trail 2650 GTX Price
Test results
Trail 2650 GTX $210
Compared to 38 hiking shoes
Number of shoes
£70
Price
£200