Our verdict

The Brooks Beast GTS 24 fully lives up to its name with unparalleled stability and long-lasting outsole durability—qualities we found are hard to match. However, its substantial weight and firm midsole create a ride that’s anything but lively, fun or energetic. Still, for those focused on stability and value over speed or lightness, this shoe it’s undeniably a... beast!

Pros

  • Wear-resistant, durable outsole
  • Comfortable upper
  • Exceptional for heel strikers
  • Doubles as a versatile lifestyle shoe
  • HIgh-quality build
  • Innovative tongue
  • World-class stability
  • Stability-focused footbed

Cons

  • Limited breathability
  • Not for forefoot strikers
  • Extra-firm midsole feel
  • It's still too heavy!

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

We think the Brooks Beast GTS 24 is an outstanding choice for:

  • Overpronating runners who need a durable, support-focused daily trainer for easy miles.
  • Heel strikers seeking a reliable workhorse with a long-lasting outsole.
  • Those looking for a stable shoe that doubles as a comfortable walking sneaker and don’t plan on running faster paces in it.

Brooks Beast GTS 24

Who should NOT buy

The Beast GTS 24 is a polarising shoe, packing some impressive features but also a few notable drawbacks. With a steep 12.7-mm heel-to-toe drop and a narrow forefoot area, we believe it’s not the ideal choice for forefoot or midfoot strikers. For those runners, options like the Hoka Arahi 7 or Altra Experience Form could be a more natural fit.

We’re also convinced that the shoe’s hefty weight and firm midsole may deter runners seeking a softer experience. Fortunately, alternatives like the ASICS Gel Kayano 31, with a more cushioned feel, or the lightweight Saucony Guide 17 could meet those needs better.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

The primary reason this shoe weighs more than the Beast GTS 23 is the added foam underfoot. Specifically, Brooks increased the heel stack from 36.4 mm to 38.5 mm—a slight boost that justifies the weight gain.

In our opinion, though, it might not be worth it. We found that the previous Beast already provided enough cushioning. However, this increase is a minor adjustment overall.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Heel stack
Test results
Beast GTS 24 38.5 mm
Average 34.0 mm
Compared to 351 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Heel stack
46.3 mm

Forefoot stack

At the front of the shoe, additional cushioning provides joint protection for forefoot strikers. Our measurements showed a forefoot thickness of 25.8 mm, offering a noticeable increase from the previous model.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Forefoot stack
Test results
Beast GTS 24 25.8 mm
Average 25.4 mm
Compared to 351 running shoes
Number of shoes
7.6 mm
Forefoot stack
37.1 mm

Drop

With a substantial 12.7-mm drop, we believe this shoe could be fantastic for heel strikers who enjoy this high-drop geometry. However, in our experience, forefoot and midfoot strikers might find it awkward for their stride style, making it feel mismatched with their landing pattern.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Drop
Test results
Beast GTS 24 12.7 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 351 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.8 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Insole thickness

The Beast GTS 24’s insole stands out as one of the thickest we've encountered in our lab, measuring 6.5 mm.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Insole thickness
Test results
Beast GTS 24 6.5 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 347 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.3 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

While our test is called “midsole softness,” this shoe is anything but soft. This came as a bit of a surprise, given that even stability shoes are trending toward a softer feel—but not the Beast GTS series.

With a firm 30.1 HA rating in our Shore A durometer test and a thick outsole layer beneath the foam, the ride feels undeniably sturdy. For a stability shoe, this solid build creates natural support, though it may deter runners who prefer a softer feel underfoot.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 DNA Loft v3

As for the foam, Brooks uses the DNA Loft v3 compound, slightly tweaked. This material sits mid-range in Brooks’ lineup—not the lightest or most responsive, but certainly geared for durability and a resilient ride.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Midsole softness
Test results
Beast GTS 24 30.1 HA
Average 21.0 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 279 running shoes
Number of shoes
8.5 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
41.5 HA

Midsole softness in cold (%)

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

DNA Loft v3 is a supercritical EVA foam, meaning ethylene-vinyl acetate is at its core—a material that, in our experience, often hardens noticeably in cold weather.

After testing the Beast GTS 24, we found a 35.0 HA reading on our durometer following 20 minutes in the freezer, marking a 16.2% uptick—a solid performance indeed!

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
Beast GTS 24 16.2%
Average 25.4%
Compared to 278 running shoes
Number of shoes
0%
Midsole softness in cold
100%

Size and fit

Size

Brooks Beast GTS 24 is true to size (71 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how do you like the size?

Small True to size Large
Compared to 228 running shoes
Number of shoes
Small
True to size
Large

Toebox width - widest part

The room inside the upper is average and should suit most runners well, especially since Brooks offers this shoe in two wide sizes (2E and 4E) in select markets.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 fit

Our initial measurement at the widest part of the upper came in at 99.5 mm, which confirms what we felt during our first tests—a comfortable, well-designed fit that adapts to most foot shapes.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Toebox width - widest part
Test results
Beast GTS 24 99.5 mm
Average 98.4 mm
Compared to 352 running shoes
Number of shoes
89.5 mm
Toebox width - widest part
109.1 mm

Toebox width - big toe

The volume is good enough, as is typical with most Brooks shoes. This brand rarely creates a sense of pressure in the toe area, and we found that the Beast GTS 24 maintains that easy, spacious fit—exactly what we hoped for.

Moving back to the width, in the toe area, we measured 78.7 mm, which matches our experience. It feels neither wide nor narrow—just an average, balanced fit that offers solid comfort without excess room.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Toebox width - big toe
Test results
Beast GTS 24 77.9 mm
Average 78.3 mm
Compared to 226 running shoes
Number of shoes
60.4 mm
Toebox width - big toe
92.5 mm

Tongue: gusset type

In our lab, discovering a one-sided, semi-gusseted tongue is rare—99% of running shoes feature the same design on both sides of the tongue. However, Brooks revamped the tongue from the v23, giving it a unique setup that we already found in the Hyperion 2.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 one side gusset

The medial side is securely fixed, while the lateral part remains free.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
Beast GTS 24 One side (semi)

Stability

Lateral stability test

Every Brooks GTS edition consistently delivers outstanding stability, and the Beast GTS 24 is no different. In our experience, it excels at keeping your foot centred and preventing lateral motion, especially along the medial side.

The Beast GTS 24 firmly belongs in our “stable as a table” category of running shoes.

The main highlight is the GuideRails technology, but there’s more to its stability features—a rock-solid heel counter, reinforced upper sections, and a unique foam insert below the arch that subtly re-centres the foot for a balanced, controlled ride.

Torsional rigidity

Designing a stable running shoe with low torsional rigidity wouldn’t make sense—it would be counterproductive. Fortunately for anyone choosing the Beast GTS 24, its rigid (4/5) structure effectively prevents lateral forces that don’t bother neutral runners but pose a challenge for those needing extra stability.

Test results
Beast GTS 24 4
Average 3.3
Compared to 330 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The heel counter of the Beast GTS 24 remains unchanged from last year, providing an iron-stiff structure that supports heel strikers exceptionally well—we rated it 5 out of 5, and it’s almost funny how barely it moved when we applied pressure!

With this in mind, Brooks sought to balance the high rigidity with plenty of padding in the Achilles area, which helps offset potential discomfort.

Test results
Beast GTS 24 5
Average 2.8
Compared to 314 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

We said before that this shoe is clearly geared toward heel strikers, and its dimensions confirm it. We measured the forefoot at 116.8 mm—somewhat narrow for a stability shoe!

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Beast GTS 24 116.8 mm
Average 114.1 mm
Compared to 352 running shoes
Number of shoes
100.5 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
127.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The rearfoot is a different story. At 101.9 mm, it’s impressively wide, reinforcing its heel-striker-friendly design. 

We now understand the reasoning—given the shoe’s high weight, Brooks had to choose where to narrow the midsole, and reducing the heel landing platform wouldn’t make sense when heel strikers are the target users, right?

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Beast GTS 24 101.9 mm
Average 90.7 mm
Compared to 352 running shoes
Number of shoes
74.9 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Flexibility

Stiffness

Our 90-degree bend test, which required 26.6N, revealed a surprising contrast to the shoe's 4/5 torsional stiffness and 5/5 heel counter—the Beast GTS 24 is flexible lengthwise!

This moderate level of longitudinal flexibility offers an everyday-comfort feel without sacrificing stability. In other words: for those seeking a stable, comfortable shoe suitable for both work and running, this is a solid choice.

Test results
Beast GTS 24 26.6N
Average 28.6N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 334 running shoes
Number of shoes
2.2N
Stiffness
94.4N

Weight

At 12.6 oz or 357g, the Beast lives up to its name in weight, ranking among the heaviest shoes we’ve tested in the lab, even heavier than its predecessor! And there’s no way around it—the heft is noticeable with every stride.

Test results
Beast GTS 24 12.59 oz (357g)
Average 9.38 oz (266g)
Compared to 352 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.26 oz (149g)
Weight
12.59 oz (357g)

Breathability

At first glance, we thought the Brooks Beast GTS 24 would offer excellent ventilation, given the toebox is packed with ventilation holes. However, our smoke-pumping machine quickly revealed that this supposed airflow was largely absent.

The lack of ventilation primarily stems from Brooks’ focus on comfort and stability. They crafted a plush, structure-retaining upper, as we verified with our LED flashlight, using a double-layer engineered mesh that restricts air circulation.

Through our microscope, we found the ventilation holes were clearly obstructed by the secondary layer—a discovery that instantly explained why the shoe barely expelled smoke. We ultimately rated it 2/5 for ventilation.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 mesh

However, what the Beast GTS 24 lacks in breathability, it makes up for with a cloud-like comfort, especially suited for colder days.

The upper is generously padded in key areas, and the build quality meets high expectations for a premium-priced shoe. Just avoid it on hot summer days!

Test results
Beast GTS 24 2
Average 3.8
Compared to 281 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toebox durability

The engineered mesh on the Beast GTS 24, in our view, falls short on durability expectations. During our testing, we found it lacking the toughness needed for long-lasting wear.

We subjected it to our standardised Dremel test—applying consistent force (3.2N) and time (5s) across all shoes. Unfortunately, the Beast GTS 24 scored a disappointing 2/5, landing it at the lower end of the durability scale in Brooks lineup.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Toebox durability
Test results
Beast GTS 24 2
Average 2.5
Compared to 215 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Things improved slightly on the heel, though not enough to break out any big celebrations. After completing our test in this area, we found what we consider to be an average 3/5 rating.

In our opinion, this score is adequate for this shoe, especially considering that comfort-oriented models tend to perform lower in this test as they have softer, more luxurious padding in the heel collar. The thicker cushioning often sacrifices durability under stress, but the Beast GTS 24 held its own reasonably well.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Heel padding durability
Test results
Beast GTS 24 3
Average 3.2
Compared to 211 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

In our experience with Brooks models designed for stability, we often find they play it safe when it comes to the outsole, opting for a durable rubber that offers decent grip but is built to last nearly forever.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 outsole coverage
We have no complaints about the outsole coverage—it effectively shields all high-wear areas.

Our initial test of the Beast GTS 24’s rubber confirmed our expectations—a tough, resilient material (85.5 HC) ready to, theoretically, handle any surface with minimal wear. Now, let’s put that to the test!

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Outsole hardness
Test results
Beast GTS 24 85.5 HC
Average 80.0 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 332 running shoes
Number of shoes
52.1 HC
Outsole hardness
93.0 HC

Outsole durability

For this test, we used the Dremel again, cranking it up to 10K. The Beast GTS 24’s outsole performed as anticipated, handling the intensity with ease.

After completing the test, we measured a mere 0.7 mm indentation in the rubber—that's a remarkably solid outcome! In our experience, most running shoes show a deeper dent, so this durability is impressive.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Outsole durability
Test results
Beast GTS 24 0.7 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 193 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

In our view, anyone looking for a near-indestructible outsole can stop searching now. With 4.8 mm of rubber thickness, this heavy-duty outsole is akin to having the fuel tank of a trailer in a standard sedan.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 rubber

We anticipate real-world durability exceeding 1000 miles, even for the heaviest runners! On the other hand, this thick rubber poses a drawback—the ride feels overly firm, and we found zero ground feedback on every step.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Outsole thickness
Test results
Beast GTS 24 4.8 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 351 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole thickness
6.6 mm

Misc

Price

The Beast GTS 24 may seem a bit pricey for what it offers, especially as other high-end shoes often provide a softer, more bouncy feel. The Beast, however, excels on stability and durability in a no-nonsense, sturdy package.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Side

It might appear costly compared to other daily trainers, but based on its build quality and the expected longevity, we believe it’s reasonably priced for those who prioritise long-lasting reliability over trendy features.

Test results
Beast GTS 24 $160
Compared to 352 running shoes
Number of shoes
£45
Price
£300

Reflective elements

The Beast GTS 23 included a small yet crucial reflective piece in the heel—making runners more visible at night to cars and bikes. However, this v24 has none. And that's a step back.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Reflective elements
Test results
Beast GTS 24 No

Tongue padding

Sure, this shoe is as heavy as a brick, but it’s also exceptionally comfortable. A big part of that comfort lies in the plush 9.6-mm tongue, which features a thick foam layer sandwiched between two thinner layers for a truly luxurious feel.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 tongue

We appreciated that Brooks uses two tongue loops instead of one. This, combined with the single-side gusset, keeps the tongue perfectly in place, ensuring a snug fit without any shifting during runs.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Tongue padding
Test results
Beast GTS 24 9.6 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 349 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.5 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Heel tab

Brooks remains one of those brands that consistently forgo adding finger-loop heel tabs on their road shoes—a trend they’ve continued with the Beast GTS 24.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Heel tab
Test results
Beast GTS 24 None

Removable insole

We had no issues removing the insole. However, if you choose to replace it, you’ll lose the unique design crafted for this model, featuring varied textures and enhanced support—a noticeable upgrade from the basic EVA insoles common in running shoes.

Brooks Beast GTS 24 Removable insole
Test results
Beast GTS 24 Yes