Our verdict

A total revamp of the previous version, we found that the Nike Vapor Pro 2 takes the Vapor series away from super light and speedy shoes and makes a turn towards versatility. The Pro 2 carries an extra pound of comfort, support, and durable elements which kept us surefooted in most on-court scenarios. Our playtests also revealed that the shoe benefits athletes who slide aggressively and prefer staying at the baseline. Considering how similar its design is to the premium Nike Vapor 11, we believe that the Nike Vapor Pro 2 offers great value for money.

Pros

  • Breathable for hot weather
  • Exceptional durability (toe drag ready!)
  • Zoom Air adds impact protection
  • Great balance of cushioning and court feel
  • Very stable and supportive
  • Slides effortlessly
  • Generously padded

Cons

  • Heavier than average (and the original Vapor)
  • Not the strongest grip
  • Not for wide feet

Audience verdict

84
Good!

Who should buy

Having thoroughly tested the Nike Vapor Pro 2, we believe that its versatility can suit various types of players but it is going to be particularly beneficial for:

  • aggressive sliders who want a more forgiving outsole and a highly durable toe drag guard
  • baseline players who don't move around the court a lot but perform very forceful lateral cuts

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 review

Who should NOT buy

If you've come to expect super light and nimble shoes under the Nike Vapor name, you are likely to be disappointed in the Vapor Pro 2. The shoe has gotten heavier and clunkier in return for offering more comfort and stability. For a more Vapor-like experience, we recommend the ASICS Solution Speed FF 3.

Even though this Nike shoe features a Zoom Air unit, it didn't feel particularly lively and responsive. If that's what you are looking for, you will find it in the Nike Zoom GP Challenge 1 instead.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 lab test

Cushioning

Heel stack

Nike's product page describes the Vapor Pro 2 as being "lower to the court." While it's certainly not the most grounded tennis shoe we've tested, it didn't feel tall either.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Heel stack

Our caliper measurement returned a heel stack of 28.9 mm which is just the same as the category average.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 28.9 mm
Average 29.3 mm
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
25.3 mm
Heel stack
33.0 mm

Forefoot stack

The same can be said about the shoe's forefoot stack. At 18.8 mm, it is just about the same as the average.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Forefoot stack

But it doesn't feel like average thanks to the Zoom Air unit embedded into the ball of foot area. We could feel the benefit of added impact protection that this pressurized air unit offered on hard landings.

However, it's not the same bouncy Zoom Air experience that you would get in a shoe like the Nike Zoom GP Challenge 1. That's the shoe to consider if you are looking for an extra spring in your step courtesy of two Zoom Air units inside.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 18.8 mm
Average 19.6 mm
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
16.1 mm
Forefoot stack
23.4 mm

Drop

The heel-to-toe difference brings no surprises in the Nike Vapor Pro 2. Based on our stack height measurements, it comes in at a standard 10.1 mm.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Drop

In this setup, the heel is moderately elevated above the toes, offering a slightly tilted foot position. This gives the rearfoot more cushioning for landings whereas the forefoot gets a better ground feel and maneuverability for precise movements.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 10.1 mm
Average 9.7 mm
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
6.2 mm
Drop
14.7 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

The difference in foam density between the original Vapor Pro and the Vapor Pro 2 is strikingly evident! Looks like Nike decided to soften things up in the second version quite a bit.

Pressing our Shore A durometer against the half-cut midsole of the Pro 2 returned a low reading of 20.0 HA. This is notably softer than average and is a whopping 70% softer than the original Pro!

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Midsole softness

Of course, the hard rubber sidewalls create a firm carrier to keep this plushness under control but we could still feel the soft touch directly underfoot.

This update evidently made the Vapor Pro 2 more comfortable and better cushioned but, unfortunately, it took away that instant responsiveness of the original Vapor.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 20.0 HA
Average 28.4 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
17.1 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
34.0 HA

Insole thickness

There is nothing particularly interesting about the shoe's insole. Showing 4.4 mm of thickness in our caliper measurement, it is slightly thinner than average and has a standard shape.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Insole thickness
Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 4.4 mm
Average 5.2 mm
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
3.9 mm
Insole thickness
7.5 mm

Size and fit

Size

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 is true to size (17 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 24 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Toebox width - widest part

We found that the Nike Vapor Pro 2 has a one-to-one toebox fit but we wouldn't call it tight.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Toebox width at the widest part

Showing 97.8 mm in the widest area of the toebox, it is 2-3 mm narrower than the average in a D-medium width.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 fit

Considering that the shoe's toebox is also covered in firm protective overlays, we don't think that this amount of space is optimal for wide feet. You may want to try the Nike Vapor 11 or opt for ASICS tennis shoes because Nike doesn't make alternative widths for tennis footwear.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 97.8 mm
Average 101.0 mm
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
96.3 mm
Toebox width - widest part
105.0 mm

Toebox width - big toe

The narrower part of the shoe's toebox (near the big toe) returned an average caliper measurement of 76.5 mm.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Toebox width at the big toe

But it doesn't change the fact that the toe space of the Nike Vapor Pro 2 is quite limited.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 76.5 mm
Average 76.9 mm
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
74.7 mm
Toebox width - big toe
81.0 mm

Laces

The Nike Vapor Pro 2 features basic flat laces that are not slippery and stay tied quite nicely.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 laces

An additional eyelet on the very top of the collar helps to make the fit slightly tighter if needed. However, it doesn't have a counterpart on the other side of the collar which results in a bit of an asymmetrical lacing.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 sideview

And if you struggle to find the medial top eyelet, it is hidden under a protective rubber overlay.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 eyelet protection

Stability

Lateral stability test

It seems like the Nike Vapor Pro 2 followed the same approach to stability as the Vapor 11. The two shoes even look alike from the side! Except that the Vapor 11 has notably taller TPU sidewalls and the Pro 2 relies on firm carrier foam and rubber overlays.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 vs Nike Vapor 11 comparison

The lateral support offered by the Nike Vapor Pro 2 made us feel very confident during the playtest. You can see how steady it remained in our ankle-shifting test below.

On the other hand, we felt like the shoe evolved from an agile all-court option into more of a stable baseline-oriented shoe.

Torsional rigidity

Even though the Nike Vapor Pro 2 doesn't have a stiff shank in its midsole, our manual test revealed how much torsional rigidity it managed to pack without it!

On a 1-5 scale, we confidently gave this court shoe the maximum score of 5. Ankle twisting is just not happening here!

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 5
Average 4.3
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

Our heels also felt securely locked inside this Nike shoe. Its substantial heel counter is very generously padded and has a great deal of stiffness to prevent in-shoe play.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 4
Average 3.9
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

The full-length frame on the lateral side of the shoe creates large flanges in both the forefoot and the heel. We found these especially helpful for forceful lateral movements during quick cuts. 

Measuring the widest area of the Vapor Pro 2's forefoot returned a solid reading of 107 mm.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Midsole width in the forefoot

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 107.0 mm
Average 111.9 mm
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
105.3 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
117.4 mm

Midsole width - heel

The rearfoot flange, on the other hand, made the shoe's heel wider than average at 93.2 mm in the widest area.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Midsole width in the heel

Interestingly, most of the protrusion occurs in the medial side of the heel which we found to be very helpful in preventing overpronation and foot spilling.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 93.2 mm
Average 89.5 mm
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
82.4 mm
Midsole width - heel
99.7 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

The presence of thick rubber overlays on the upper and a Zoom Air unit in the forefoot had a noticeable effect on the shoe's flexibility. It needed a bit more effort to bend compared to the average tennis shoe.

Our force gauge recorded that it took 34.0N to bend the Vapor Pro 2 to a 90-degree angle - 15% more than it takes on average.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 flexibility

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 34.0N
Average 31.3N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
18.8N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
52.0N

Weight

If you loved the original Vapor Pro for its light and barely-there feel, you might be disappointed in the second iteration. The Pro 2 gained over an ounce of weight and now became even heavier than the average tennis shoe at 13.4 oz (381g).

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Weight

It also feels quite bottom-heavy on foot and is hardly reminiscent of the stereotypical Nike Vapor we've gotten used to.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 13.44 oz (381g)
Average 12.84 oz (364g)
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
10.30 oz (292g)
Weight
14.71 oz (417g)

Breathability

As summer temperatures keep beating records, we were delighted to see another breathable tennis shoe in our lab.

The amount of smoke and the speed at which it passed through the Vapor Pro 2's toebox reassured us of its excellent ventilation capacity.

Even though there is a padded lining beneath the mesh, we found that it's not enough to obstruct the airflow.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Breathability microscope test

Looking at the mesh through the lens of our microscope, we think that it might be the exact same fabric as in the Vapor 11. It mixes thin TPU chain linking with puffier weaves to create a highly porous material.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Breathability upper under microscope

Taking all of these findings into consideration, we can confidently rate the Nike Vapor Pro 2's breathability with the highest score of 5!

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 5
Average 3.4
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Durability

Toe guard durability

The protective rubber overlays all over the Vapor Pro 2 look very reassuring. Nike even added those to the eyestay which is a high-wear area that is very often overlooked.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 toe drag guard

Equipped with a Dremel and sandpaper, we drilled the toe guard near the big toe as that's where most of the abrasion occurs during a slide.

But even though our test was quite demanding (22 seconds at 10K RPM speed), the Dremel hardly even burned halfway through the toe guard! This impressive abrasion resistance earned the Nike Vapor Pro 2 a high score of 4 for toe guard durability.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Toe guard durability test
Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 4
Average 2.6
Compared to 8 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toe guard durability
5

Toebox durability

Even though Vapor Pro 2 is very well reinforced, it has quite a few areas with exposed mesh. Sure, these bits are less likely to get damaged but we still wanted to check their durability potential in case they brush against the court.

With the Dremel speed of 5K RPM, it took just a few seconds to tear a hole in the shoe's delicate mesh. Thus, we rated its toebox durability as low as 2 on a 1-5 scale.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Toebox durability test

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 2
Average 3.8
Compared to 31 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Luckily, the Vapor Pro 2 uses a pretty hard-wearing fabric for its interior lining. The mesh refused to give in to sandpaper in our 4-second Dremel test so we confidently rated the shoe's heel padding durability with a high score of 4.

This is great news considering how much friction occurs between the ankle and the shoe collar throughout a tennis match.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Heel padding durability test
Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 4
Average 3.1
Compared to 31 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

The Vapor Pro 2 continued to impress us with its durability potential. Now it was time to test the outsole.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Outsole hardness

The rubber compound showed a high reading of 85.8 HC on our Shore C durometer which is a standard hardness for a tennis shoe.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 85.8 HC
Average 86.1 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
79.0 HC
Outsole hardness
92.0 HC

Outsole durability

The rubber also proved its worth in a one-to-one battle with sandpaper.

After 22 seconds of drilling, the compound showed barely noticeable signs of wear. Based on our tread gauge measurement, the dent was as shallow as 0.6 mm. This is a solid result for a high-performance tennis shoe.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Outsole durability test
Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 0.6 mm
Average 0.8 mm
Compared to 31 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

To be on the safe side, Nike also made the Vapor Pro 2's outsole thicker than usual.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Outsole thickness

Seeing 4.8 mm on our caliper further raised our confidence in the longevity of this Nike tennis shoe. In the absence of an official outsole durability warranty, that was a very reassuring finding.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 4.8 mm
Average 4.2 mm
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
3.0 mm
Outsole thickness
5.1 mm

Misc

Grip / Traction

Playtesting the Nike Vapor Pro 2, we experienced a good balance of grip and give which accommodated both hard stops and sliding on the court.

Taking a closer look at the shoe's traction pattern, we could see how that was made possible with smooth texture in the forefoot and protruding lugs in the heel.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 traction pattern

However, if you're someone who favors sticky traction on the court, you will most likely be disappointed in this Nike shoe. And it should also be noted that the shoe's traction pattern only gets smoother with use. Perhaps the herringbone pattern of the Nike GP Challenge Pro would be more suitable if you want a toothier grip.

Price

Even though it is a step-down version of the premium Nike Vapor 11, we believe that the performance gap between the Vapor Pro 2 and the Vapor 11 is not as big as the gap in their retail prices. The silhouette and design approach is very similar.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 style

So even with a slight increase over the past version, we found the retail price of the Nike Vapor Pro 2 to be fair.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 $130
Average $136
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
$80
Price
$200

Tongue padding

We found that the Nike Vapor Pro 2 is very generously padded compared to its predecessor.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Tongue padding

For example, the shoe's tongue packs as much as 9.2 mm of padding foam whereas the original Vapor had only 2.5 mm!

The collar of the Vapor Pro 2 also hugs the ankle comfortably with a solid amount of foam. 

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 9.2 mm
Average 7.7 mm
Compared to 33 tennis shoes
Number of shoes
2.5 mm
Tongue padding
13.1 mm

Tongue: gusset type

We haven't experienced any issues with the Vapor Pro 2's lockdown or foothold. This is in part thanks to the presence of a semi-gusseted tongue, or stretchy internal sleeve, as Nike calls it in the specs.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Tongue: gusset type

It prevented the tongue from shifting around and added a sock-like touch to the shoe's fit.

Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 Both sides (semi)

Heel tab

There are no pull tabs at the back of the Nike Vapor Pro 2

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Heel tab
Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 None

Removable insole

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 insole removable

The shoe's insole can be easily removed in case you want to use a custom orthotic or elevate the comfort with a different insert.

NikeCourt Vapor Pro 2 Removable insole back
Test results
Court Vapor Pro 2 Yes