Our verdict

The Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 aims to be a supershoe, but we found in the lab that it doesn’t quite reach that mark. It lacks the high energy return expected at this level, and its weight is also heavier than it should. We think it performs better as a premium, speed-oriented trainer for track sessions or tempo runs. On a bright note, we were impressed by its top-tier build quality, plush underfoot feel, and durable outsole—yet its steep price and modest performance make it difficult to recommend when so many rivals deliver more bounce for less money.

Pros

  • Exceptional build quality (made in France)
  • Reliable shock absorption
  • Durable, high-traction outsole
  • Secure heel lockdown
  • MATRYX upper
  • Smooth forefoot rocker
  • Plush and fun underfoot feel
  • Great option for speed-focused training sessions

Cons

  • Disappointing energy return
  • Heavier than expected
  • Poor price-to-performance ratio
  • Not for heel strikers

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

We believe the Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 will appeal to:

  • Runners who love classic racing flats for their agile feel but want the modern feel of a plush foam.
  • Those who appreciate top-tier materials and build quality, as this shoe is made in France and features a MATRYX upper.
  • Athletes with a generous budget seeking a durable competition shoe that offers greater flexibility than most modern supershoes.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2

Who should NOT buy

We think the S/Lab Phantasm 2 isn’t the best option for those chasing state-of-the-art racing performance. Our testing revealed that its midsole foam lacks the energy return needed for true speed. Instead, the Nike Streakfly 2 delivers a far more energetic ride at a lower price, keeping the same compact build and fun running experience.

Additionally, we believe the S/Lab Phantasm 2 is heavier than it should be, and it simply doesn’t match the feather-light standards of today’s supershoes. If you’re after that cloud-like feel underfoot in an ultra-light package, the ASICS Metaspeed Ray is the best alternative.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 parts

Cushioning

Shock absorption

New

The Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 packs ample cushioning to tackle any race distance, even the marathon. We measured a strong 142 SA in the heel and 114 SA in the forefoot, confirming impressive shock-absorption performance.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Shock absorption heel
Heel
Forefoot
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 142 SA
Average 129 SA
Compared to 283 running shoes
Number of shoes
52 SA
Shock absorption
173 SA

Energy return

New

However, the S/Lab Phantasm 2 delivered a disappointing outcome in our energy return test. We tested it carefully and found that it reached only 57.8% energy return in the heel and a slightly better 62.1% in the forefoot.

Therefore, we can't consider this one a real supershoe, as its performance falls short of current standards. In our view, these numbers are far below what a high-end, race-focused shoe should deliver today.

This result didn’t surprise us. The shoe uses the optiFOAM+ compound, which mixes PEBA with EVA, although most online reviews claim the midsole feels "super bouncy" because it’s made from PEBA. We found that this is misleading. Salomon clearly states on its website that it’s a PEBA-EVA blend, and our lab-tested data confirms the truth with undeniable clarity.

Heel
Forefoot
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 57.8%
Average 58.6%
Compared to 280 running shoes
Number of shoes
38.0%
Energy return
83.0%

Heel stack

With a 31.5 mm heel, the S/Lab Phantasm 2 takes a distinct route compared to today’s marathon supershoes that push the 40 mm limit. Its lower profile gives it that classic racing-flat sensation.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Heel stack
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 31.5 mm
Average 34.8 mm
Compared to 475 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.5 mm
Heel stack
48.1 mm

Forefoot stack

The forefoot sits close to average thickness at 26.4 mm, though it's slightly thinner than what we usually find in modern supershoes.

That’s not necessarily a drawback, it’s more about preference. If you enjoy added ground feel and control, especially for 5K or 10K racing, this one fits the bill.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Forefoot stack
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 26.4 mm
Average 26.1 mm
Compared to 475 running shoes
Number of shoes
13.7 mm
Forefoot stack
38.5 mm

Drop

In our lab tests, we usually find running shoes with a higher drop than the brand claims. However, the S/Lab Phantasm 2 showed the opposite: we measured just 5.1 mm, while Salomon lists 9 mm.

This clearly makes the shoe more suited for midfoot strikers, a point we’ll revisit when discussing the plate.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Drop
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 5.1 mm
Average 8.6 mm
Compared to 475 running shoes
Number of shoes
-0.1 mm
Drop
16.1 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

We tested the optiFOAM+ compound and found that, while it’s not as bouncy as expected, it feels extremely soft underfoot. For runners who enjoy a plush, pillow-like sensation, it absolutely delivers, and we confirmed this with a 13.5 HA durometer reading.

The Phantasm 2 uses the same foam both above and below the plate, creating a consistent soft feel throughout. However, with the reduced stack height, heavier runners or those with a powerful stride should note that bottoming out is quite possible.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Midsole softness
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 13.5 HA
Average 20.4 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 401 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.9 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
36.1 HA

Rocker

The S/Lab Phantasm 2 showcases an intriguing geometry, with a strong forefoot rocker that begins unusually late, and it's somewhat reminiscent of recent ASICS designs.

The heel also features a distinct curve for a racing shoe, which we appreciate, as the moderate drop benefits requires for a smoother heel-to-toe transition for heel strikers.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Rocker

Plate

New

Let’s get back to the plate, as promised. We previously recommended this shoe for midfoot strikers because its plate feels less aggressive than the classic spoon-shaped designs made famous by the Nike Vaporfly, performing better for those who land slightly behind the ball of the foot.

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Width / Fit

Like most Salomon shoes, the fit isn’t very spacious, yet it’s far from narrow. When we first tested this pair, we were genuinely surprised by its slightly roomier feel for a competition model from the French brand.

We measured a width of 94.1 mm, which perfectly matched our first-hand impressions. Or should we say first-foot impressions?

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Width / Fit
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 94.1 mm
Average 95.2 mm
Compared to 230 running shoes
Number of shoes
88.5 mm
Width / Fit
101.1 mm

Toebox width

Our second toebox measurement showed limited room for toe splay—but honestly, that’s no surprise. At 72.1 mm, it’s exactly what we’d expect from a competition shoe.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Toebox width
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 72.1 mm
Average 73.3 mm
Compared to 230 running shoes
Number of shoes
66.7 mm
Toebox width
82.6 mm

Toebox height

Runners concerned about toe pressure can relax.

With 27.4 mm of toebox height, the S/Lab Phantasm 2 provides plenty of space, and its ultra-thin upper means black toenails would only happen if you size down too much.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Toebox height
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 27.4 mm
Average 27.1 mm
Compared to 230 running shoes
Number of shoes
22.0 mm
Toebox height
34.1 mm

Traction / Grip

Traction test

The best Salomon trail shoes use contaGRIP rubber, and the French brand created a special variant called Road contaGRIP for, unsurprisingly, road running shoes. It's a high-traction compound designed to deliver top grip on asphalt or concrete surfaces.

We tested it using the SATRA TM144 method and confirmed the grip is truly there. With a 0.58 score, it ranks on the higher end of the scale, proving itself as a super-reliable outsole for any race-day weather.

Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 0.58
Average 0.47
Compared to 274 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.11
Forefoot traction
0.84

Outsole design

New

This outsole features a dual-compound layout with black rubber concentrated in the forefoot for traction and lighter grey zones at the heel. We also found deep longitudinal grooves that enhance flexibility and reduce weight.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Outsole design

Flexibility / Stiffness

One of the most unique aspects of the S/Lab Phantasm 2 is its low stiffness, just 13.5N. While that number may not sound low compared to all running shoes, it makes this one of the most flexible racing models we’ve tested in recent years.

This could appeal to runners who dislike the ultra-rigid feel of most competition shoes. However, it’s worth noting that the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 achieves similar flexibility, delivers far greater energy return, maintains a comparable weight, and comes at a noticeably lower price...

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 13.5N
Average 15.2N
Compared to 277 running shoes
Number of shoes
4.0N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
28.5N

Weight

Weight is also far from being a strength of the S/Lab Phantasm 2 at 7.5 oz or 213g.

This extra heft comes from the mixed-foam construction, as combining EVA with PEBA adds mass to the midsole. For example, the New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v5 is not one of the lightest supershoes, but it's lighter than this shoe, proving that Salomon needs to refine the next version in order to be competitive.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Weight
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 7.5 oz (213g)
Average 9.3 oz (265g)
Compared to 476 running shoes
Number of shoes
5.3 oz (149g)
Weight
12.9 oz (366g)

Breathability

The MATRYX upper of the S/Lab Phantasm 2 is crafted with a mesh that delivers exceptional build quality and premium construction. However, when it comes to ventilation, it scored only 3/5 in our lab test.

Salomon opted for a denser upper than what we usually find in racing shoes, likely to enhance stability and prevent early tearing around the forefoot flex points, where the upper bonds to the midsole.

Under the microscope, we discovered the reason behind the lower-than-expected breathability.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 microscope

Although the fabric itself is ultra-thin in the toebox area, the spacing between yarns is too tight to allow proper airflow, and a pattern with larger ventilation holes would have performed better.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 mesh

The tongue includes generous padding, and the heel does too, though cushioning is limited to a narrow strip instead of the whole area. 

This type of targeted heel cushioning doesn’t suit everyone, but we found that it delivered a very good lockdown.

Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 3
Average 3.7
Compared to 405 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Lateral stability test

The Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 feels mostly unstable in the heel and midfoot due to its narrow, ultra-soft landing base. However, the forefoot offers a touch more stability, as the rocker promotes smooth forward motion and limits side movement, and the plate gives a Vaporfly-like feel.

Still, runners needing support should look elsewhere.

Torsional rigidity

Thanks to the full-length carbon plate inside the shoe, torsional rigidity achieved a max 5/5 score. And in this case, it’s a much-needed feature that adds a hint of support for steadier landings.

Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 5
Average 3.5
Compared to 454 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

The upper hugs the heel like a glove, thanks to its highly-pliable construction that scored 1/5 in our manual test. This design is common in racing shoes, though it further contributes to the heel’s limited stability.

Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 1
Average 2.9
Compared to 438 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

One of the features that makes the S/Lab Phantasm 2 genuinely fun to run in is its compact build, measuring 108.6 mm in the forefoot.

The shoe feels nimble and works great for short-interval training or races filled with sharp, quick turns.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 108.6 mm
Average 114.4 mm
Compared to 476 running shoes
Number of shoes
100.8 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
127.9 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel, however, truly made us raise an eyebrow. At only 74.9 mm, it’s strikingly narrow—one of the slimmest we’ve ever measured in the lab—making this shoe a crazy choice for runners who strike hard on their heels.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Midsole width - heel
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 74.9 mm
Average 90.8 mm
Compared to 476 running shoes
Number of shoes
70.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.6 mm

Durability

Toebox durability

The upper is incredibly thin, which becomes obvious in our video, as you can clearly see the plastic insert we use to maintain the shoe’s shape.

To counter this, Salomon applied some of its trail-shoe know-how, adding extra protection to the toe cap. Still, when we tested the mesh with our Dremel, the upper proved brutally fragile, earning a 1 out of 5 for durability.

Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 1
Average 2.6
Compared to 339 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

The heel padding showed far better durability, scoring 4/5 in our Dremel test under the same conditions: 2N of force and 5K RPM.

Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 4
Average 3.4
Compared to 333 running shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole durability

The Road contaGRIP outsole also proved impressively durable, showing just 0.9 mm of wear. That's a clear improvement over most competition shoes, which typically perform worse in this test.

Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 0.9 mm
Average 1.0 mm
Compared to 317 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

Thanks to the strong abrasion resistance of the Road contaGRIP rubber, Salomon managed to use only 1.6 mm of outsole thickness while still achieving solid durability.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Outsole thickness
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 1.6 mm
Average 3.2 mm
Compared to 472 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.9 mm
Outsole thickness
6.1 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The insole is razor-thin at just 2.0 mm of thickness, impressively minimal even for a racing shoe.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Insole thickness
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 2.0 mm
Average 4.5 mm
Compared to 471 running shoes
Number of shoes
1.5 mm
Insole thickness
7.8 mm

Removable insole

You can remove the stock insole and replace it with a third-party one, but its slim, narrow shape leaves very limited space in the toebox.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Removable insole
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 Yes

Midsole softness in cold (%)

The PEBA+EVA blend of optiFOAM+ performed decently in our 20-minute freezer test, becoming 22% firmer.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 22%
Average 25%
Compared to 400 running shoes
Number of shoes
1%
Midsole softness in cold
63%

Reflective elements

We found zero reflective elements in the S/Lab Phantasm 2.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Reflective elements
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 No

Tongue padding

We tested the S/Lab Phantasm 2 and found its lacing system refreshingly simple: flat laces, punched eyelets, an extra hole for the runner’s knot, and a tongue loop that keeps things nicely centred. The laces, however, feel surprisingly cheap for a shoe in this premium price range with a MATRYX upper.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 laces

But what truly sets it apart is the thick, comfort-focused tongue. While most competitors go ultra-thin—like the PUMA Fast-R Nitro Elite 3 with just 0.4 mm—Salomon chose a cushioned (and heavier) approach that feels unique, though we’re still uncertain if the trade-off pays off.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Tongue padding
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 4.9 mm
Average 5.8 mm
Compared to 473 running shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
14.2 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The tongue, as in most racing shoes, isn’t attached to the sides and may slide around if the lockdown isn’t properly secured.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Tongue: gusset type
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 None

Price

In our view, the S/Lab Phantasm 2 comes with one of the weakest price-to-performance ratios from a major brand. It clearly needs a top foam to reach supershoe standards.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Made in France

Still, it carries a rare appeal: it’s made in France! That's something almost unseen today among competition models, with Diadora being the only other medium or big brand producing shoes in Europe. And, of course, that drives the price up... but we need Made in France... avec une meilleure mousse!

Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 $275
Compared to 476 running shoes
Number of shoes
£45
Price
£285

Heel tab

The heel showcases a minimalist design, free from any finger-loop tab or extra detailing.

Salomon S/Lab Phantasm 2 Heel tab
Test results
S/Lab Phantasm 2 None