Our verdict

ASICS took a different approach from most brands and essentially built a Metaspeed for the track. And it worked. We found in the lab that the LD 2 blends a fast, spring-loaded ride with a level of comfort rarely seen in track spikes. We really liked the secure fit, road-shoe-inspired feel, and snappy carbon plate, all of which helped the shoe perform wonderfully during long efforts. However, the high price is hard to overlook, particularly when it arrives without the latest foam technology from ASICS.

Pros

  • Excellent for long-distance track racing
  • Carbon plate brings extra pop
  • Excellent upper delivers impressive fit
  • Plush heel padding boost comfort
  • The closest spike feel to a road super shoe
  • Beautiful aesthetics
  • Incredible at faster paces
  • Maxes out World Athletics stack height limit

Cons

  • Lacks ASICS' flagship foam
  • Very high price
  • Demands good form

Audience verdict

N/A
Not enough reviews yet

Who should buy

After testing the ASICS Metaspeed LD 2, we recommend it for:

  • Track athletes with efficient mechanics who enjoy an aggressive and highly propulsive toe-off.
  • Runners already using the Metaspeed lineup on the road and looking for a track spike with a familiar ride and fit.
  • Competitive long-distance racers seeking a super spike that takes full advantage of the maximum legal foam allowance for 5k and 10k events.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2

Who should NOT buy

The biggest drawback of the ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 is its exceptionally high price. For runners who only race on the track a handful of times each year, the investment may be difficult to justify. In that case, we think options like the Nike Dragonfly 2 or the Saucony Terminal VT offer stronger overall value with similar performance.

We also believe the LD 2 can perform well in events such as the 800m and 1500m. However, athletes focused primarily on those distances may be better served by a more specialized spike like the Nike Victory 2.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 parts

Cushioning

Heel stack

The Metaspeed LD 2 is built specifically for long-distance track racing, which explains why it packs 18.0 mm of foam under the heel. Given that World Athletics allows a maximum stack height of 20.0 mm for track spikes, ASICS pushed the design remarkably close to the limit.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Heel stack
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 18.0 mm
Average 16.2 mm
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
10.4 mm
Heel stack
19.9 mm

Forefoot stack

Speaking of pushing limits, the forefoot is where ASICS went all in.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 FF Turbo

We measured an impressive 19.6 mm of stack height in this area, a design choice that makes perfect sense given that track athletes spend most of their time landing on their forefoot when racing in spikes.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Forefoot stack
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 19.6 mm
Average 15.4 mm
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
8.3 mm
Forefoot stack
19.7 mm

Drop

As expected from our previous measurements, the ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 features a negative drop of -1.6 mm, reinforcing its forefoot-first design philosophy. In our opinion, this aggressive design is best suited to experienced track athletes rather than beginners.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Drop
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 -1.6 mm
Average 0.8 mm
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
-5.8 mm
Drop
5.1 mm

Midsole softness

Updated
Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

ASICS could have equipped the Metaspeed LD 2 with the FF Turbo+ foam found in models like the Metaspeed Sky Tokyo, yet it instead relies on the FF Turbo compound from previous Metaspeeds and the original Superblast.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 FF Turbo

We believe this decision was intentional, as the firmer nature of FF Turbo is better suited to the demands of a track spike. Our durometer confirmed this with a notably firm 44.2 AC reading. However, it's hard to ignore that at this premium price point, the absence of the flagship foam from the ASICS lineup may be a deal-breaker.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Midsole softness
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 44.2 AC
Average 45.1 AC
Compared to 24 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
25.9 AC
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
58.7 AC

Secondary foam softness

Updated
Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.

The LD 2 features a dual-layer midsole construction, with the bottom layer measuring slightly firmer in our tests at 46.3 AC.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Secondary foam softness
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 46.3 AC
Average 46.4 AC
Compared to 8 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
31.5 AC
Secondary foam (soft to firm)
63.8 AC

Plate

ASICS clearly thinks that a true super spike needed a carbon plate. The Metaspeed LD 2 features one of the most road super shoe-like plates we've seen in a track spike, delivering a remarkably similar sensation underfoot.

Size and fit

Size

Owners of this shoe, how does it fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large

Internal length

Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.
ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Internal length
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 258.0 mm
Average 261.1 mm
Compared to 23 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
253.5 mm
Internal length
270.0 mm

Width / Fit

Dialing in the fit of a track spike usually requires a more aggressive approach than a road shoe, and that's exactly how the Metaspeed LD 2 felt during our wear tests. Compared to the road-focused Metaspeed lineup, it delivers a slightly snugger fit, though the difference is fairly small.

We then moved to the lab and took three key measurements. The first came in at 88.4 mm, placing the LD 2 close to the average for a track spike while measuring 2.1 mm narrower than the Metaspeed Sky Tokyo.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Width / Fit
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 88.4 mm
Average 88.5 mm
Compared to 24 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
85.9 mm
Width / Fit
91.2 mm

Toebox width

The toebox measured exactly the same 70.1 mm as the road-focused Metaspeed Sky Tokyo, making the LD 2 one of the more appealing spikes for runners who appreciate a bit of extra room up front. We wouldn't describe it as wide-foot-friendly, but it certainly feels more accommodating than many of its direct competitors.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Toebox width
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 70.1 mm
Average 68.7 mm
Compared to 24 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
64.3 mm
Toebox width
74.1 mm

Toebox height

We also believe that toebox height won't be a concern for most runners.

At 26.5 mm, it provided enough vertical space to remain comfortable throughout our testing while still delivering the secure, race-ready lockdown expected from a track spike.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Toebox height
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 26.5 mm
Average 26.1 mm
Compared to 24 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
21.0 mm
Toebox height
32.0 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

ASICS even markets the Metaspeed LD 2 as an exceptionally stiff spike, yet our lab results told a slightly different story. Requiring just 11.6N of force to bend to 30 degrees, it proved somewhat more flexible than several of its key rivals.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Flexibility / Stiffness
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 11.6N
Average 14.5N
Compared to 26 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
3.4N
Flexibility ←→ Stiffness
31.6N

Weight

The ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 weighed in at 5.5 oz (156 g) on our scale, delivering a highly competitive result that neither impressed nor disappointed. In our view, it's right where a premium long-distance spike should be.

However, after seeing what ASICS achieved with the featherweight Metaspeed Ray, we believe the next-generation LD needs to shed even more weight.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Weight
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 5.5 oz (156g)
Average 5.6 oz (159g)
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
4.2 oz (119g)
Weight
6.8 oz (193g)

Breathability

One area where ASICS has excelled in recent years is upper design, and the Metaspeed LD 2 takes full advantage of that expertise by featuring the same MOTIONWRAP 2.0 material found in its road-racing siblings.

During our testing, this upper delivered an outstanding balance of comfort, security, and airflow. It performed admirably in our breathability assessment, earning a solid 4/5 score and proving more than capable of handling demanding track sessions and races during summer.

As expected, ventilation is concentrated in the forefoot, where cooling matters most, and gradually decreases toward the rear of the shoe to enhance structure and lockdown.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 microscope

A closer look under our digital microscope left us genuinely impressed.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 mesh

The material showcased exceptional build quality, with a remarkably refined construction that reflects the premium nature of the spike.

The heel also stands out by offering noticeably more padding than most competing models. ASICS included a substantial amount of foam in an area where many rivals rely on minimal cushioning or none at all, resulting in a more comfortable fit.

Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 4
Average 3.9
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Stability

Torsional rigidity

Updated

The carbon plate helps limit excessive lateral movement, enhancing stability in the process. We confirmed this in our torsional rigidity test, where the Metaspeed LD 2 recorded 11.9 Nm.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Torsional rigidity
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 11.9 Nm
Average 10.7 Nm
Compared to 22 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
6.7 Nm
Torsional rigidity
17.4 Nm

Heel counter stiffness

With its generously padded heel and a heel counter that scored just 2/5 in stiffness, we found the Metaspeed LD 2 especially appealing for runners seeking extra comfort and a touch more structure around the rearfoot rather than an ultra-flexible design.

Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 2
Average 1.6
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Nike made the Dragonfly 2 slightly wider than its predecessor, whereas ASICS retained a narrow and compact geometry with the Metaspeed LD 2.

Our forefoot measurement came in at 94.2 mm, confirming the shoe's streamlined and race-focused shape. However, it's important to consider that the carbon plate and firm FF Turbo foam work together to enhance stability, allowing ASICS to pursue such a narrow design.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 94.2 mm
Average 95.3 mm
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
87.6 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
103.6 mm

Midsole width - heel

The heel truly surprised us in the lab, measuring just 55.9 mm wide.

For runners seeking a barely-noticeable rearfoot that stays completely out of the way, the Metaspeed LD 2 delivers exactly that sensation.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Midsole width - heel
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 55.9 mm
Average 62.8 mm
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
50.8 mm
Midsole width - heel
73.3 mm

Durability

Heel padding durability

Despite its exceptionally comfortable feel, the heel also demonstrated impressive durability in our Dremel test, earning a strong 4/5 score.

Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 4
Average 3.8
Compared to 26 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole thickness

The Metaspeed LD 2 relies on two small rubber pods positioned in the heel to serve as its outsole, keeping weight to a minimum while still providing some protection.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 rubber pods

In our measurements, these rubber sections came in at 2.8 mm thick, offering a sensible balance between durability and weight savings for a competition-focused spike. In fact, maybe these could be a bit thinner...

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Outsole thickness
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 2.8 mm
Average 2.7 mm
Compared to 25 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
1.0 mm
Outsole thickness
4.5 mm

Misc

Insole thickness

The insole is exceptionally thin at 1.8 mm, allowing ASICS to maximize the amount of FF Turbo foam underfoot and make the most of the limited stack height permitted by World Athletics regulations.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Insole thickness
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 1.8 mm
Average 2.6 mm
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
0.8 mm
Insole thickness
3.9 mm

Tongue padding

The lacing system performed flawlessly in our testing, largely thanks to the excellent toothed laces that lock into place securely and help create an outstanding fit.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 laces

We also appreciated that ASICS kept the tongue exceptionally thin at just 0.7 mm while maintaining excellent ventilation. This minimalist design aligns perfectly with the spike's racing focus and helps to keep weight low.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Tongue padding
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 0.7 mm
Average 2.3 mm
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
0.4 mm
Tongue padding
7.5 mm

Heel tab

The heel features the same streamlined design found across the road-focused Metaspeed lineup, with a clean, minimalist finish and no heel tab.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Heel tab
Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 None

Price

The biggest drawback of the Metaspeed LD 2 is undoubtedly its premium price tag. In our opinion, ASICS appears to position this spike primarily for elite athletes and dedicated fans of the Metaspeed lineup rather than as a high-volume product aimed at capturing a larger share of the track market.

Test results
Metaspeed LD 2 $250
Compared to 27 track and field shoes
Number of shoes
£70
Price
£220

Removable pins

ASICS experimented with some interesting outsole concepts in its previous track spikes, but grip in wet conditions never fully met expectations.

As a result, the brand returned to the proven formula, equipping the Metaspeed LD 2 with six removable pins that can be easily replaced using the spike wrench included in the box.

ASICS Metaspeed LD 2 Removable pins