Our verdict
Pros
- Environmentally friendly
- Breathable knit upper
- Good impact dampening
- Snug sock-like fit
- Accommodating toebox
- Secure heel hold
- Quite flexible and comfy
- Smooth and stable ride
- Works as a walker or gym shoe
Cons
- Quite heavy
- Pricey for a daily trainer
- Not so responsive
Audience verdict
Comparison
The most similar running shoes compared
+ + Add a shoe | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audience score | 79 Bad! | 90 Great! | 86 Good! | 88 Great! | |
Price | $160 | $150 | $160 | $150 | |
Pace | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running | |
Arch-support | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | |
Weight lab Weight brand | 10.3 oz / 293g 10.6 oz / 300.5g | 10.7 oz / 304g 10.9 oz / 309g | 9.9 oz / 282g 10.1 oz / 286g | 9.7 oz / 275g 9.8 oz / 277g | |
Drop lab Drop brand | 8.1 mm 8.5 mm | 7.7 mm 8.0 mm | 7.7 mm 10.0 mm | 8.5 mm 10.0 mm | |
Strike pattern | HeelMid/forefoot | Mid/forefoot | Mid/forefoot | HeelMid/forefoot | |
Midsole softness | Balanced | Soft | Soft | Balanced | |
Difference in midsole softness in cold | Small | Small | Small | Small | |
Toebox durability | Good | Good | Decent | Decent | |
Heel padding durability | Decent | Good | Good | Decent | |
Outsole durability | Good | Good | Good | Decent | |
Breathability | Moderate | Breathable | Moderate | Moderate | |
Toebox width at the widest part | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | |
Toebox width at the big toe | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | |
Stiffness | Moderate | Moderate | Flexible | Moderate | |
Difference in stiffness in cold | Small | Small | Small | Normal | |
Torsional rigidity | Stiff | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | |
Heel counter stiffness | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Stiff | |
Heel lab Heel brand | 32.1 mm 30.5 mm | 34.3 mm 32.5 mm | 33.9 mm 39.0 mm | 33.6 mm 39.0 mm | |
Forefoot lab Forefoot brand | 24.0 mm 22.0 mm | 26.6 mm 24.5 mm | 26.2 mm 29.0 mm | 25.1 mm 29.0 mm | |
Widths available | Normal | Normal | NormalWideX-Wide | NormalWide | |
Orthotic-friendly | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Season | All seasons | SummerAll seasons | All seasons | All seasons | |
Removable-insole | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Ranking | #250 Bottom 5% | #51 Top 20% | #179 Bottom 32% | #97 Top 37% | |
Popularity | #235 Bottom 10% | #129 Top 49% | #14 Top 6% | #39 Top 15% |
Who should buy
We recommend the Allbirds Tree Flyer 2 as an excellent choice for:
- Environmentally conscious runners who want a planet-friendly option that has a much smaller carbon footprint to produce
- Neutral runners looking for a well-cushioned and comfy daily trainer
- Runners in warmer climates looking for a shoe with
- Active folks in the market for a versatile and durable shoe that can take on light trails and other fitness activities
- Style-minded individuals looking for a sleek and geometric design that's good for strutting about town
Who should NOT buy
With its £160 price tag, the Tree Flyer 2 might be prohibitively expensive for most runners, especially for a daily trainer. We recommend checking out the Brooks Trace 2 as a more budget-friendly alternative that also makes use of recycled materials in its construction.
The Tree Flyer 2 is a daily trainer that's best suited to less intense runs over short to moderate distances. For runners who want a shoe that is better suited to mile-gobbling long-distance sessions, we suggest the similarly stacked Brooks Launch 10 or the much more cushioned On Cloudmonster instead.
When it comes to speedier runs, we recommend checking out the Hoka Mach 5 as a snappier alternative.
Tipping our scale at 10.3 oz (293g), the Tree Flyer 2 is heavier than the average road shoe. For those who prefer a more lightweight daily trainer, we recommend the feathery Saucony Kinvara 14.
Breathability
At 32.1 mm thick according to our calliper measurements, the Tree Flyer 2's heel stack is just shy of our current lab average. This is still a good amount of foam underfoot to ensure well-cushioned and protective landings during our less intense daily runs. However, long-distance runners will be better served by a shoe with a higher stack like the On Cloudmonster instead.
The Tree Flyer 2's heel also extends outwards, which is beneficial for runners with a heel-striking stride and also makes the shoe feel very comfortable whenever we take it out for a walk.
Tree Flyer 2 | 4 |
Average | 3.8 |
Durability
Toebox durability
Interestingly for a road shoe, the Tree Flyer 2 has a bio-based TPU overlay that acts as a toe bumper with the aim of protecting the fragile knit upper. To put this protective layer to the test, we fired up our Dremel to 5K RPM and set it against the toebox with 3.2N of force.
Powering down our tool after the four-second test, we were pleased to find that the overlay actually held up to the relentless grinding and was only left with a small indent at the point of contact. This leads us to give the Tree Flyer 2 a perfect 5 out of 5 for toebox durability.
Tree Flyer 2 | 5 |
Average | 2.5 |
Heel padding durability
The Tree Flyer 2's insole isn't glued in, so removing it in favor of a custom orthotic or an aftermarket alternative is possible if needed.
Tree Flyer 2 | 2 |
Average | 3.3 |
Outsole hardness
The Tree Flyer 2's outsole is about as hard as average, giving us a durometer reading of 82.9 HC. Throughout the course of testing shoes here in the lab, we found that this level of hardness usually denotes a good balance of grip and durability with only a few exceptions here and there. Let's see if the Tree Flyer 2 is one of them.
Tree Flyer 2 | 82.9 HC |
Average | 80.0 HC |
Outsole durability
Now spinning at a more formidable 10K RPM, we set our Dremel against the Tree Flyer 2's outsole for a total of twenty-two seconds of abrasive force.
Once all was said and done, we used a tyre tread gauge to measure the indentation left behind by our tool and found that only 0.7 mm of material was lost. This is a slightly better performance in this test than the average road shoe and means that we fully expect this shoe to hit the expected shelf life of 400 to 500 miles with some life left in the outsole yet.
Tree Flyer 2 | 0.7 mm |
Average | 1.0 mm |
Outsole thickness
Further contributing to the longevity of the outsole is just how much rubber we have underfoot to burn through before losing traction entirely. At 5 mm thick according to our caliper measurements, the Tree flyer 2's outsole it quite a bit thicker than our current lab average.
Tree Flyer 2 | 5.0 mm |
Average | 3.2 mm |
Weight
While its name implies a lightweight frame for fluttering through our daily runs, the Tree Flyer 2 is actually heavier than the average road shoe at 10.3 oz (293g). That said, it didn't feel overly bulky during our test runs or while walking around in this shoe.
Tree Flyer 2 | 10.34 oz (293g) |
Average | 9.35 oz (265g) |
Cushioning
Heel stack
At 32.1 mm thick according to our calliper measurements, the Tree Flyer 2's heel stack is just shy of our current lab average. This is still a good amount of foam underfoot to ensure well-cushioned and protective landings during our less intense daily runs. However, long-distance runners will be better served by a shoe with a higher stack like the On Cloudmonster instead.
The Tree Flyer 2's heel also extends outwards, which is beneficial for runners with a heel-striking stride and also makes the shoe feel very comfortable whenever we take it out for a walk.
Tree Flyer 2 | 32.1 mm |
Average | 34.0 mm |
Forefoot stack
Up at the forefoot, the Tree Flyer 2's stack is right on par with our current lab average at 24 mm thick according to our caliper. This means that forefoot strikers should also enjoy landings protected from impact in this shoe while still getting some sense of the ground below for intuitive toe-offs.
Tree Flyer 2 | 24.0 mm |
Average | 25.4 mm |
Drop
The difference in our stack measurements leaves the Tree Flyer 2 with a drop height of 8.1 mm, making the brand-stated drop of 8.5 mm laudably accurate. This offset isn't too steep and should suit the needs of most runners regardless of footstrike.
Tree Flyer 2 | 8.1 mm |
Average | 8.6 mm |
Insole thickness
At 3.8 mm thick, the Tree Flyer 2's insole is just shy of our current lab average. That said, it still provides a decently padded footbed for us to sink into as we land in the shoe.
Tree Flyer 2 | 3.8 mm |
Average | 4.5 mm |
Midsole softness
We pressed our durometer against the SwiftFoam midsole and got a reading of 22 HA. This isn't exactly plush but it feels quite forgiving underfoot; baffling the impact of our landings with a soft touch that nicely mutes out the harsh road below.
While the midsole is a Bio-Pebax foam made from castor beans, it doesn't retain the same qualities as its non-bio formulation; namely, the responsiveness we've come to expect from Pebax foams like Nike's ZoomX as found in the Invincible Run FlyKnit 3.
Tree Flyer 2 | 22.0 HA |
Average | 21.0 HA |
Midsole softness in cold
Difference in midsole softness in cold
To observe the effects of cold conditions on the midsole, we placed the Tree Flyer 2 in the freezer for twenty minutes and then pressed our durometer against it once more. Becoming only 11.4% firmer in the cold makes the Tree Flyer 2 much more consistent than the average road shoe and means that the cushioning should feel just as soft no matter how low the mercury drops.
Tree Flyer 2 | 11.4% |
Average | 25.2% |
Stability
Lateral stability test
The Tree Flyer 2 feels grounded as we shift our weight from side to side in the shoe. However, as a neutral shoe with no guidance features, it does little to mitigate excessive lateral movements, making it less than ideal for those with pronounced overpronation. That said, we didn't experience any major instability during testing.
Torsional rigidity
The Tree Flyer 2 put up a relatively high level of resistance as we bent and twisted it in our hands, leading us to give it a torsional rigidity score of 4 out of 5. This feels quite comfortable underfoot as it allows for some natural twisting of our foot while still providing a sturdy and level landing surface for surefooted landings.
Tree Flyer 2 | 4 |
Average | 3.3 |
Heel counter stiffness
Despite the external heel counter being made of a seemingly solid TPU overlay, we found it to be relatively pliable in our manual assessment, leading us to give it a middle-of-the-road stiffness score of 3 out of 5. This also feels quite comfortable as it holds our foot in place nicely without putting too much pressure on our heels and tendons.
Tree Flyer 2 | 3 |
Average | 2.8 |
Midsole width in the forefoot
We measured the Tree Flyer 2's midsole to be 116 mm wide at the forefoot, making it quite a bit broader than our current lab average.
Tree Flyer 2 | 116.0 mm |
Average | 114.0 mm |
Midsole width in the heel
The midsole isn't quite as robust at the heel which measures 88.8 mm wide. While this is narrower than our current lab average, it should still be enough of a platform for heel strikers to enjoy stable landings in this shoe.
Tree Flyer 2 | 88.8 mm |
Average | 90.7 mm |
Flexibility
Stiffness
We secured the Tree FLyer 2 to our workbench and used a force gauge to find that only 24.1N of force is needed to bend the shoe to 90 degrees.
This is more flexible than the average road shoe and means that the Tree Flyer 2 is able to bend along with our foot with relative ease. This contributes to the shoe's easy and forgiving ride which makes it easy to wear the shoe comfortably for extended periods.
Tree Flyer 2 | 24.1N |
Average | 28.8N |
Difference in stiffness in cold
We also repeated the flex test after letting the shoe chill in the freezer for twenty minutes and found that it only became 8.2% stiffer when exposed to the cold. This is much more consistent than the average shoe under similar conditions which, in combination with the midsole's post-freezer test, makes the shoe a decent winter training partner. We say, "decent", as the shoe's relatively high breathability means that we'll likely suffer from cold feet in extremely frigid weather. However, a warm pair of socks could help stave off frostbitten toes.
Tree Flyer 2 | 8.2% |
Average | 34.6% |
Size and fit
Toebox width at the widest part
We measured the toebox with our caliper to be 100.5 m wide at its widest point. This is wider than our current lab average and means that the Tree Flyer 2 should accommodate runners with wide feet quite comfortably.
Tree Flyer 2 | 100.5 mm |
Average | 98.4 mm |
Toebox width at the big toe
Moving up to the area around the big toe, we measured the Tree Flyer 2's toebox to be 77.6 mm wide. This is right on par with our current lab average and means that we had ample room to splay out without butting up against the upper. That said, broad-footed runners of certain foot shapes who need a little more wiggle room to avoid hotspots should consider the slightly roomier Allbirds Tree Dasher 2 instead.
Tree Flyer 2 | 77.6 mm |
Average | 78.3 mm |
Tongue: gusset type
The Tree Flyer 2's one-piece upper construction has a sock-like fit that feels like the shoe warps itself around our foot rather than us simply sitting within. It's stretchy enough to accommodate our foot comfortably while, at the same time, elastic enough to lock us in nicely.
Tree Flyer 2 | Sock like |
Comfort
Tongue padding
With no tongue to measure per se, we pinched our calliper on the material across the instep of the upper and found it to only be 3.4 mm thick.
While this isn't paper-thin, we would have greatly appreciated another millimetre or two from this daily trainer so that the laces didn't feel quite as apparent across our instep during testing. That said, using as little material as possible serves to keep some weight off this already chunky shoe and jives with the shoe's environmental ethos.
Tree Flyer 2 | 3.4 mm |
Average | 5.7 mm |
Heel tab
The inclusion of a sleek finger loop at the heel of the Tree Flyer 2 is a nice little detail that helps us slide the shoe on and off a little more easily.
Tree Flyer 2 | Finger loop |
Removable insole
The Tree Flyer 2's insole isn't glued in, so removing it in favor of a custom orthotic or an aftermarket alternative is possible if needed.
Tree Flyer 2 | Yes |
Misc
Reflective elements
Proudly emblazoned at the heel of the Tree Flyer 2 is a small plaque that proudly states the shoe's carbon footprint of only 7.21 kg CO2e and acts as a small reflective element for some minimal nighttime visibility. That said, we still recommend using additional high-vis gear if running along dimly lit roads at night.
Tree Flyer 2 | Yes |