Verdict from 5 experts and 100+ user reviews

6 reasons to buy

  • A good number of cross-training enthusiasts thought that the UA Charged Ultimate 2.0 worked well for various types of training activities.
  • Many users enjoyed the close-to-the-ground feeling when they wore the shoe.
  • The upper was able to deliver a snug and secure fit, as stated by a majority of reviewers.
  • The traction of the outsole received praise from numerous wearers.
  • The shoe provided a solid platform, according to those who used it for weightlifting.
  • Quite a few people took note of the lightweight nature of the trainer.

2 reasons not to buy

  • A lot of testers agreed that the burrito tongue made it difficult to put on the shoe.
  • A handful of reviewers complained that the tongue dug into the foot and shin during the movement.

Bottom line

The Under Armour Charged Ultimate 2.0 was met with a primarily positive reaction. The users enjoyed its comfortable and locked-down feel. However, plenty of wearers complained about the discomfort caused by the tongue and the upper construction. But overall, the reviewers found it a solid and versatile training shoe.

Tip: see the best training shoes.

Good to know

The Under Armour Charged Ultimate 2.0 got a serious makeover compared to its predecessor. The new version has a more understated and streamlined design. The upper now employs a burrito-tongue construction for a more precise fit. A knit fabric is added to the medial quarter for a comfortable, customized fit. The external heel cup also has a more minimalist design that is different from the previous version.

The full-length rubber outsole protects the Under Armour Charged Ultimate 2.0 from abrasion. It is non-marking, so it does not scuff or damage the wooden and tiled floors in indoor gyms.

A unique tread pattern is featured in this training shoe. It’s designed to deliver multi-surface grip and traction. There are strategically-placed flex grooves in the forefoot section to ensure the optimum flexibility of the foot.

Responsive cushioning in the Under Armour Charged Ultimate 2.0 is provided by the Charged Cushioning midsole. Its purpose is to absorb impact and to return energy to the foot of the wearer. This unit has also been carried over to the new version of the trainer, the Charged Ultimate 3.0.  

The shoe utilizes the 4D Foam sock liner, which molds to the shape of the foot to eliminate slippage. It’s also designed to provide underfoot comfort.

The platform extends to the upper and wraps the front and lateral sides of the shoe for added support. Its back portion also juts out and forms into a rear bumper for enhanced durability.

The upper of the Under Armour Charged Ultimate 2.0 is primarily made of synthetic material and tightly-woven mesh for a breathable yet snug coverage. The medial quarter of the shoe has a piece of flat knit fabric that contributes to the comfort and steadiness of the foot.

The burrito-tongue construction delivers a locked-in, supportive fit throughout the midfoot. Its style prevents the tongue from bunching up or moving to the sides during workouts. 

The TPU skin over the forefoot section is utilized for versatile support. It also reinforces the high-wear toe box area to protect the shoe from damage.

The shoe makes use of an external heel counter. It holds the rear of the foot firmly in place throughout the training.


How Under Armour Charged Ultimate 2.0 ranks compared to all other shoes
Top 25% workout training shoes
All workout training shoes
Top 29% Under Armour training shoes
All Under Armour training shoes
Top 32% cross-training training shoes
All cross-training training shoes


The current trend of Under Armour Charged Ultimate 2.0.
Compare to another shoe:
Nicholas Rizzo
Nicholas Rizzo

Nick combines 10+ years of experience in the health and fitness industry and a background in the sciences in his role as the Fitness Research Director. During his competitive powerlifting years his PRs have him sitting in the top 2% of bench presses (395 lbs), top 3% of squats (485 lbs) and top 6% of deadlifts (515 lbs) for his weight and age. His work has been featured on, LiveStrong, Healthline, WebMD, WashingtonPost, and many more. Along the way, collaborating with industry leaders like Michael Yessis, Mark Rippetoe, Carlo Buzzichelli, Dave Tate, Ray Williams, and Joel Seedman.