Verdict from +100 user reviews

5 reasons to buy

  • People generally like the aesthetics of the Reebok Lite 2.0, stating that they can enjoy many activities because of the fresh looks.
  • The underfoot experience given by this neutral running shoe is responsive and comfortable.
  • Runners are happy with the lightweight construction of this product, emphasizing its capacity to permit all-day wear.
  • Based on a handful of reviews, the upper unit is breathable enough to prevent a stifling in-shoe hug.
  • The price of this product is welcomed; consumers think that it is very affordable.

2 reasons not to buy

  • A few people lamented the absence of rubber in the outsole, stating that they have experienced some slipping while going with their runs.
  • The ground contact foam used for the external pad develops signs of wear quickly, according to some users.

Bottom line

The overall feedback towards the Reebok Lite 2.0 has been positive. This road running shoe is welcomed because of its affordable price tag, its lightweight configuration, and its versatile design. On the other hand, the flimsy durability of the outsole and the occasional slipping that comes with the absence of rubber are criticized.

The Reebok Lite 2.0 is for those who like efficient but cheap running shoes.

Tip: see the best running shoes.

User reviews:

Good to know

Runners are treated to lightweight and easy performances with the Lite 2.0. This Reebok running shoe aims to deliver additional in-shoe security and the perception of being properly hugged by the overall design because of form-fitting elements such as a flexible platform and an uncluttered yet overlay-laden silhouette. In fact, the addition of more overlays is what differentiates this model from its immediate predecessor.

True to size measurements were used when the Reebok Lite 2.0 was made. Consumers are welcome to get a pair with their usual sizing expectations in mind. Still, it is highly recommended to test this product personally before purchase or study user reviews from different sources to fully enjoy an accommodating in-shoe experience.

When it comes to the sideways hug of this shoe, the elements that work together to ensure a snug yet accommodating wrap are the semi-curved shape of the platform and the lightweight yet overlay-filled upper. Wobbliness is what this product’s in-shoe feel aims to prevent.

The outsole of the Reebok Lite 2.0 doesn’t have a rubber layer. This part of the product is made up of ground contact foam. The purpose of this design is to maintain a lightweight form. Traction is given by a tread pattern that is comprised of incognito bumps and square recessions.

The midsole of this road running shoe is comprised of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) piece. This cushioning unit aims to mitigate the impact shock generated by the foot-strike and energize the forefoot lifts. The lightweight nature of this industry-standard foam permits natural movements and comfortable strides.

A fabric-topped insole offers additional comfort to the underside of the foot. It is thin, flexible, and able to blend with the shape of the platform.

The upper unit of this product utilizes mesh. This material is tasked with securing the foot and locking it in place. The net-like structure is slightly stretchy, so natural motion and swelling of the foot during the run aren’t curtailed. Breathing holes accommodate environmental air into the foot-chamber, thus giving a cool and dry ride. Breathable meshes are found in many performance shoe series, including the well-received Nike Revolution line.

Overlays are stitched onto the silhouette of the Reebok Lite 2.0. These accouterments help the facade when it comes to locking the foot inside the shoe and averting accidental shoe removals. They are found on the bridge of the upper, as well as the sides and the heel.

How Lite 2.0 compares

This shoe: 81
All shoes average: 82
56 95
This shoe: £60
All shoes average: £120
£40 £280
Ready to buy?
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen

Jens Jakob is a fan of short distances with a 5K PR at 15:58 minutes. Based on 35 million race results, he's among the fastest 0.2% runners. Jens Jakob previously owned a running store, when he was also a competitive runner. His work is regularly featured in The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC and the likes as well as peer-reviewed journals. Finally, he has been a guest on +30 podcasts on running.