Lowa Maddox GTX Lo review
The Corescore is a score from 0-100 that summarizes opinions from users and experts. Below shows the distribution of scores for all hiking shoes.
This shoe has a 7% penalty on its expert reviews because it has fewer than 5 reviews. This is to avoid that shoes with few reviews unjustly receives high scores.
Learn moreVerdict from 1 expert & 100+ users
Pros
- Comfortable hiking shoe
- Lightweight
- Breathable
- Speed lacing system
- Excellent grip
- Waterproof
Cons
- The tongue does not stay centered
77% say it's true to size.
Out of stock in all 30 shops
Lowa hiking shoesComparison to similar hiking shoes
+ + Add a product | + + Add a product | + + Add a product | + + Add a product | + + Add a product | + + Add a product | + + Add a product | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoreScore | |||||||
| Users rating | |||||||
| Experts | |||||||
| Best price | |||||||
| Ranking | |||||||
| Popularity | |||||||
| # of colorways |
Who should buy the Lowa Maddox GTX Lo
The Lowa Maddox GTX Lo’s qualities make it a good choice for adventurers who want to go light without compromising water protection. It is a solid option if you:
- Prefer a hiking shoe that provides lightweight comfort, adequate protection, and athletic performance in a single package.
- Prefer a hiking shoe that prevents water from getting in.
- Prefer a hiking shoe that allows the user to traverse challenging terrain with a secure footing.
Secure grip on virtually all types of terrain
The Maddox GTX Lo offers a secure grip on virtually all types of terrain via its Enduro Evo outsole. It uses aggressive lugs that render traction on uneven ground and slippery surfaces. The component’s self-cleaning treads maintain ground contact by preventing debris and dirt from accumulating underneath.
Excellent heel brake
The shoe incorporates a heel brake for additional control in downhill conditions. Its front tip extends towards the upper for extra protection against stubbing.
Provides stability over rugged terrain
This hiking shoe from Lowa is capable of providing stability over rugged terrain, thanks to its double-injection DynaPU midsole. It sports several shock-absorbing zones to enhance rebound and cushioning. The footgear’s Monowrap frame, made of sturdy PU foam, offers lateral support.
Grants arch support and underfoot comfort
The shoe’s midsole contains a stabilizing element made of nylon for underfoot support. Removable footed grants arch support and underfoot comfort to the wearer.
Waterproof and breathable
The Lowa Maddox GTX Lo is equipped with an upper made of synthetic leather and microfiber. This combination imbues the gear with lightness and robustness. A Gore-Tex membrane is embedded in this component to deliver both water protection and breathability.
Durable and stable
The toe box of this watertight hiking shoe features a rand which boosts its durability. It also has a heel counter at the back for stability.
Speed lacing closure
Its lace speed closure uses a quick-lace cord and fabric eyelets. An adjustable slider made of plastic is also included to manage the footgear’s fit.
Lowa Maddox GTX Lo vs. KEEN Targhee III Waterproof
Those who require a low-top hiking shoe with a waterproof liner may want to check the Maddox GTX Lo and the Targhee III Waterproof from KEEN. These offerings are engineered with technologies that deliver performance for single-day adventures. Shown below are select components and features in which these two products differ.
Upper. The KEEN Targhee III Waterproof features an upper made of premium leather, making it tough against abrasive elements and harsh trail conditions. A KEEN Dry laminate is embedded underneath the upper to keep water out while allowing excess moisture to pass through. Its forefoot and rearfoot regions are reinforced with a cap and molded counter. These components grant durability and heel support. Moreover, the shoe’s upper is treated with Cleansport NTX technology to prevent microbes from causing an unpleasant odor.
On the other hand, the Lowa Maddox GTX Lo comes with microfiber and synthetic leather upper with a Gore-Tex membrane integrated into it. It employs a Quicklace system to enable wearers to swiftly get a personalized fit. Overall, the Lowa offering is lighter while the Targhee III Waterproof is considered to be more durable.
Midsole. The Targhee III Waterproof from KEEN comes with a dual-density EVA midsole to render a cushioned ride and reduce impact from uneven trails. It works with an internal shank and an ESS shank to promote stability and make the footgear more rigid. A metatomical footbed sits on top of the midsole to provide arch support.
Meanwhile, the Lowa Maddox GTX Lo features DynaPU midsole made of PU foam, a material known for its resiliency to wear and tear. This component works with a patented Monowrap frame to give users cushioning, rebound, and lateral support. A nylon stabilizing element is integrated into the midsole to give underfoot support.
Weight. The KEEN Targhee III Waterproof for men and women weigh 437g and 357g, respectively. The men’s Lowa Maddox GTX Lo weighs 359g while its women’s version has a weight of 359g, making it lighter.
Nice to know
- Outdoor aficionados who are planning to embark on a trek can consider Lowa’s selection of robust backpacking boots, such as the Tibet GTX and the Camino GTX.
Facts / Specs
Compare popularity Interactive
Lowa Maddox GTX Lo video reviews
