Verdict from 82 user reviews

5 reasons to buy

  • People who have tested the Jordan Grind 2 were happy with its design and aesthetics.
  • The cushioning system offered a balance between flexibility and firmness, according to consumers.
  • The upper unit’s midfoot strap helped in keeping the foot in place, a tester noted.
  • This shoe worked well as a casual or walking sneaker, a couple of users stated.
  • Several runners liked the general quality of the components, stating that they had a premium look and feel.

2 reasons not to buy

  • Some consumers felt a bit of tightness in the forefoot section.
  • A tester felt that it had a break-in period; the upper apparently needed to be stretched out via a few uses before accommodating the natural shape of the foot.

Bottom line

The Grind 2 from the Jordan brand of running shoes was welcomed by those who have tried it. The fresh aesthetics, comfortable underfoot experience, and quality materials were elements that supposedly made this road shoe an appealing one. But some people complained of tightness, with one emphasizing a need to break-in the façade and others feeling a restrictive forefoot construction.

Tip: see the best running shoes.

Good to know

  • The Jordan Grind 2 is a running shoe that’s made for those who have neutral pronation. This speed trainer’s design takes inspiration from the Air Jordan line of shoes, though it’s toned down to accommodate the intricacies of fast heel-to-toe transitions. The upper unit features a soft textile that is also breathable. An integrated midfoot strap works with the traditional lacing system to deliver a snug wrap.
  • A Lunarlon core is placed in a carrier foam, providing full-bodied cushioning and responsiveness. The outsole has a laser-engraved construction, with circular patterns and deep grooves that encourage traction and flexibility.

The Jordan Grind 2 has a standard running shoe length. Such a design accommodates runners’ expectations when it comes to size. Widthwise, the available option is D – Medium as the only available version follows the foot-dimensions of men.

A ground-contact compound is used as the outsole unit of the Jordan Grind 2. It has circular sipes and deep grooves that help in heightening the flexibility of the entire platform. The curved and rounded patterns are also responsible for traction.

A carrier foam serves as both the outsole and part of the midsole’s cushioning system. This full-length compound has a sturdy yet flexible build that aims to stave off early material sagging. The Nike Air Zoom Vomero 14 has a silhouette that is greatly similar to the Jordan Grind 2; both shoes are designed for the road.

Placed inside the carrier unit is a Lunarlon core, which is a responsive piece that is meant to attenuate impact shock and energize the toe-off. The surrounding walls that protect it are tasked with maintaining its structural integrity.

The upper unit of the Jordan Grind 2 uses a soft textile that aims to hug the foot securely. This synthetic material has breathing pores that accommodate air into the interior chamber, thus giving a ventilated in-shoe experience.

Printed overlays are placed on the forefoot and heel. These thin add-ons protect against abrasion while helping to lock the foot at the center of the shoe.

A traditional lacing system is employed in this model. Flat laces snake through discreet eyelets, adjusting the fit in conjunction with the preferences of the wearer.

A wraparound midfoot strap helps in securing the foot, particularly the instep and the arch. Small holes pockmark the façade of this feature, preserving the breathable nature of the silhouette.


How Jordan Grind 2 ranks compared to all other shoes
Bottom 16% road running shoes
All road running shoes
Bottom 25% Jordan running shoes
All Jordan running shoes
Bottom 16% neutral running shoes
All neutral running shoes


The current trend of Jordan Grind 2.
Compare to another shoe:
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen

Jens Jakob is a fan of short distances with a 5K PR at 15:58 minutes. Based on 35 million race results, he's among the fastest 0.2% runners. Jens Jakob previously owned a running store, when he was also a competitive runner. His work is regularly featured in The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC and the likes as well as peer-reviewed journals. Finally, he has been a guest on +30 podcasts on running.