We spent 8.4 hours reading reviews from experts and users. In summary, this is what runners think:

5 reasons to buy

  • The cushioning had just the right amount of firmness that enabled a steady run, according to a buyer.
  • The shoe was comfortable even from the first use, a tester remarked.
  • Several consumers thought the OSR Distance 3.0 was high-quality yet affordable footwear.
  • One wearer said the outsole supplied adequate grip for running and even other activities.
  • Many customers agreed that the Reebok OSR Distance 3.0 was a stylish shoe.

4 reasons not to buy

  • The back side was too high and rubbed on the ankle, a user complained.
  • The toe box was very narrow and uncomfortable, some wearers commented.
  • A couple of runners felt the outsole was not very durable because it wore out quickly.
  • A disappointed purchaser said the arch was positioned incorrectly and thus provided no support.

Bottom line

While it seemed that the OSR Distance 3.0 was an in-demand shoe for the consumers, there were mixed reviews about it. The comfort level and cushioning of the shoe proved to be unparalleled, according to some. However, issues about structure were apparent to others. To sum up, many users felt that a lot still needs to be improved with this running gear.


Terrain: Road
Arch support: Neutral
Weight: Men: 8.7oz | Women: 7.3oz
Heel to toe drop: Men: 8mm | Women: 8mm
Pronation: Neutral Pronation
Arch type: High arch
Strike Pattern: Midfoot strike
Distance: Competition
Brand: Reebok
Type: Low drop
Width: Men: Normal | Women: Normal
Price: $80
Colorways: Grey, Multi
Small True to size Large
See more facts

Expert Reviews

Experts are runners, who post reviews at youtube, directly at RunRepeat or at their own websites. Each expert is categorized from level 1 to level 5 based on expertise. See stats on expert reviews and how we calculate scores here.

Are you an expert? Apply to contribute here.

78 / 100 based on 1 expert reviews

  • 78 / 100 | Joseph Arellano

    Can You Go the Distance in the Reebok OSR Distance 3.0?

    More photos

    According to the OSR Distance 3.0 is a shoe designed for long-distance and tempo runs. Is this the case?  

    See the verdict below.


    The Shoe

    When I ran in the Reebok OSR Harmony Road – a shoe that I was impressed with, I kept wondering what it would be like to run in a lighter, slimmer version of the shoe. To some extent, that’s what the Distance 3.0 trainer is.

    It weighs just 8.7 ounces compared to the 10.4 ounces of the Harmony Road, and it sports an 8mm heel drop compared to the 10mm drop on the Harmony Road.

    And so, I had some optimism about the Distance 3.0.



    The Distance 3.0 has a seamless knit upper that looks both relaxed and stylish. 

    It makes use of the same KOOSHRIDE tech in the midsole and heel for protective resilience found on the Harmony Road, and one’s feet rest on a durable high-abrasion outsole.

    (The sole of the Distance 3.0 differs in one respect from that on the Harmony Road, as will be noted below.)

    The Distance 3.0 has asymmetrical lacing which eases any potential pressure on the top of the runner’s foot, and the fit of the shoe is comfortable – the fit is neither too snug nor loose.

    One noticeably odd aspect of the Distance 3.0 is the angle of the top of the heel counter. I have no idea why it bends back as it does; the padded heel counter material above the bend pushes in on the Achilles tendon.

    I never felt it affect me during a run; however, some runners may find it to be a hindrance.


    On The Road

    In general, the Distance 3.0 offers a protective and cushioned ride. It is also quite stable despite being labeled as a neutral running shoe.

    While the sole of the Distance 3.0 looks relatively flat, it offers good grip in tricky situations.

    At one point I found myself running in a business park. Some trucks had come through carrying heavy loads of sand and rocks, and large amounts dribbled out to cover the asphalt streets.

    This made the tarmac somewhat slippery and perhaps dangerous, but I had no trouble safely maneuvering along these streets in the Distance 3.0.

    The Distance 3.0 provides a nice, steady feel on asphalt.  It’s not hard to surmise that this is a clearly capable shoe for tackling marathons.

    The Power Pad 

    When I ran in the Harmony Road, I could not feel nor figure out the use or uses of the Power Pad that sits in the forefoot.

    But on the Distance 3.0, I could feel it come into play. 



    The Power Pad is a small spot that provides some additional cushioning and grip.

    It’s like a cat’s paw that sits on the sole; the Nike Air Ghost Racer of several years ago had a similar, but circular, pad on it. 

    And, so, the Power Pad is a small, unique feature that provides an added bit of confidence for the runner.


    Confidence is a key word when it comes to running shoes.

    As I increased my travel in the Distance 3.0 – both in terms of time and distance – I felt more and more confident in the shoe’s properties.  This is a good thing.

    The Achilles Heel 

    I’m using the term Achilles heel here not as a reference to an injury of the Achilles tendon, but as a colloquial reference to a weakness or flaw. 

    The Achilles heel of the Distance 3.0 is an overly-firm sole section at the rear of the shoe, the section that sits under the heel. 



    While the high-abrasion rubber sole of the Distance 3.0 is protective, it’s more than firm at the rear of the shoe. This overly-firm base winds up pounding on the heel bone after many miles of running in the trainer.  It’s not the best feeling.

    Keep in mind, that I’m a person who loved the stiff, firm polyurethane heel on the Nike Air Pegasus of earlier years.

    More recently, I liked the “poly” heel on the ON Cloudsurfer.  But the heel padding on the Distance 3.0 is far firmer.

    I’m hopeful that by the time the Distance 5.0 is released, Reebok has remedied the problem by placing some softer rubber in the rear quarter of the sole, or by building up the heel area with soft rubber as Brooks has done on the Glycerin 15

    My interim remedy built out of necessity, was to remove the sock liner that came with the Distance 3.0, replacing it with a Dr. Scholl’s Athletic Series running insole incorporating a soft rubber pad at the heel.

    The Grades

    Price: A  

    The $80 price on the Distance 3.0 is unbeatable.

    Responsiveness: A

    The springiness of the Distance 3.0 allows for quick toe-offs and it reminded me of the New Balance Fresh Foam line of running shoes.

    Stability: A

    One could not ask for a more stable ride in a trainer.

    Versatility: B to B+

    The Distance 3.0 permits one to run however feels natural to the individual runner, and it can serve as a slow pace recovery shoe, a mid-pace trainer, or as a fast-paced race day shoe.


    The Verdict

    The Reebok OSR Distance 3.0 is a shoe that displays multiple strengths while being hampered by one flaw – the overly stiff/firm/hard rear sole section which can feel bruising to one’s heel or heel bone.

    Yet it meets its promises of serving as both a tempo run and long distance shoe. It’s also light enough to use as a race day shoe.

    The Distance 3.0 is a bargain-priced shoe that will hopefully be improved in subsequent editions so that it will be found on the feet of new and young runners training for organized runs from 6.2 to 26.2 miles.

    This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.

Become an expert

  • A shoe that is able to endure the runner’s long distances, this is what the Reebok OSR Distance 3.0 claims to do. The footwear construction is for high-mileage training and tempo runs. It is ideal for neutral pronators.
  • The upper features the SmoothFuse technology, which comes in the form of a seamless mesh that is joined by synthetic overlays. This combination offers comfort and support simultaneously.
  • The midsole now makes use of Reebok’s KooshRide with a high-mile resiliency that bests traditional midsole foam. The outsole, on the other hand, is high-abrasion rubber with strategically placed reinforcements for traction where it is needed the most.

The Reebok OSR Distance 3.0 has a standard running shoe length and a wide range of size options. The structure permits a comfortable fit for wearers with a narrow to medium foot volume. The available width for the men’s and women’s versions is in medium.

The outsole of the OSR Distance 3.0 follows the layout of its predecessor. However, this version makes use of a high-abrasion rubber, and the outsole pattern displays fewer cuts to achieve better traction. This outsole material performs well like the AHAR compound found in the Asics Gel Nimbus 21.

There are reinforced rubber hits on the high-impact areas – the heel and the forefoot – to prevent them from deteriorating quickly, as well as let them handle long distances. Meanwhile, there is a gap near the heel area that shows the KooshRide cushioning in the midsole.

The KooshRide technology in the midsole takes the form of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) that looks like tiny tubular parts, reminiscent of confetti. This design leaves a space in between each piece for compression during heel-strike.

In addition to the KooshRide foam is a LiteStrike ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) midsole element that enables quick transitions. The result is a shoe that, while highly-cushioned, is able to provide a snappy ride.

The upper of the Reebok OSR Distance 3.0 presents the SmoothFuse technology, which consists of an overlay system directly fused to the fabrics. With this seamless design, the shoe is lightweight, and foot lockdown is efficient. The Reebok logos printed on both sides of the midfoot have reflective properties to allow visibility in low-light conditions.

The toe area has a PwrZone forefoot design for an enhanced push-off and overall stride effectiveness. Meanwhile, on the other end of the shoe is an external heel counter made from TPU to aid in foot security.


Jens Jakob Andersen

Jens Jakob is a fan of short distances with a 5K PR at 15:58 minutes. Based on 35 million race results, he's among the fastest 0.2% runners. Jens Jakob previously owned a running store, when he was also a competitive runner. His work is regularly featured in The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC and the likes as well as peer-reviewed journals. Finally, he has been a guest on +30 podcasts on running.