Verdict from 100+ user reviews

8 reasons to buy

  • The Flexagon Energy from Reebok astonished numerous buyers with its high level of comfort.
  • The shoe’s lightweight construction amazed a great number of wearers.
  • Many purchasers took note of its visually appealing style and color options.
  • Droves of testers were satisfied with the fit and sizing of the trainer; it did not require any breaking in.
  • The product’s affordable price point was mentioned among the shoe’s assets in a multitude of reviews.
  • It was considered supportive and reliable footwear for workout sessions and daily walks by more than a few people.
  • The trainer’s breathable materials provided ample ventilation, according to a handful of users.
  • Some testers complimented the shoe’s overall quality, describing it as well-constructed.

3 reasons not to buy

  • Multiple reviewers were disgruntled by the lack of underfoot padding; it made the footwear too hard to cushion the impact.
  • Based on several complaints, the product ran on the narrow side as it felt a bit tight.
  • A couple of purchasers reported that the outsole was not grippy enough for indoor training surfaces.

Bottom line

Those looking for a comfortable cross-trainer that could be doubled as a walking shoe will not be disappointed in the Reebok Flexagon Energy. It was highly praised for feeling light on the foot as well as offering a true-to-size fit. The shoe’s sleek design also won the hearts of many.

On the flip side, the trainer felt somewhat hard, tight, and slippery for some buyers. But the vast majority were delighted with the quality they received for such a reasonable price.

Tip: see the best training shoes.

Good to know

Designed for movement and speed, the Reebok Flexagon Energy is made of lightweight and flexible materials that allow the foot to move effortlessly and quickly. The upper uses mesh which is pliable and breathable.

Reebok Flexagon Energy vs Reebok Flexagon

The Energy version of the shoe is built for low-impact exercises, while the original Reebok Flexagon is engineered to support high-impact routines. This determines the construction differences between the two shoes:

- The upper material of the Reebok Flexagon is tightly woven and the sides of the collar sit higher compared to the Flexagon Energy. It helps to provide better ankle support during high-intensity workouts.

- The Flexagon Energy is also missing some key elements in its outsole. It lacks rubber pods at the forefoot and heel sections and deeper flex grooves at the middle, which are all present on the original Flexagon model.

The sole unit of the Reebok Flexagon Energy serves as both the outsole and the midsole. The bottom section has been constructed to be more rigid than the upper part to withstand abrasion. Flex grooves promote natural foot motion for a smooth heel-to-toe transition. The tread pattern on the underside provides traction for multidirectional movements.

Like all workout shoes, the Reebok Flexagon Energy employs a full-length foam midsole. This compound is designed to be soft to cushion impact but instantly bounce back to its original form, ready for the next step.

The Reebok Flexagon Energy is equipped with a mesh upper. This fabric is soft and the netted appearance helps keep the interior aerated. The outside of the collar is covered in tightly woven mesh which helps in providing ankle support.

Synthetic overlays protect the eyestay from premature ripping associated with regular lacing adjustments. An overlay also forms an external heel cup that secures the rearfoot and prevents it from sliding inside the shoe. The lace-up closure provides a way for wearers to adjust the snugness at the midfoot. As for the locked-down feel, the plush tongue and collar help with that.


How Reebok Flexagon Energy ranks compared to all other shoes
Top 47% workout training shoes
All workout training shoes
Top 49% Reebok training shoes
All Reebok training shoes
Top 49% cross-training training shoes
All cross-training training shoes


The current trend of Reebok Flexagon Energy.
Compare to another shoe:
Nicholas Rizzo
Nicholas Rizzo

Nick combines 10+ years of experience in the health and fitness industry and a background in the sciences in his role as the Fitness Research Director. During his competitive powerlifting years his PRs have him sitting in the top 2% of bench presses (395 lbs), top 3% of squats (485 lbs) and top 6% of deadlifts (515 lbs) for his weight and age. His work has been featured on, LiveStrong, Healthline, WebMD, WashingtonPost, and many more. Along the way, collaborating with industry leaders like Michael Yessis, Mark Rippetoe, Carlo Buzzichelli, Dave Tate, Ray Williams, and Joel Seedman.