Verdict from +100 user reviews

7 reasons to buy

  • The Reebok Flashfilm 2.0 is comfortable to wear, based on reviews. 
  • Many users mentioned that it is lightweight. 
  • The shoe breaths well, according to a few testers. 
  • Several runners highlighted the shoe’s overall quality. 
  • A couple of consumers commented that the shoe is flexible. 
  • It provides excellent arch support, said a buyer. 
  • Some users testified that the shoe is also perfect for workouts.

2 reasons not to buy

  • A few disappointed users reported that the shoe is a bit stiff, causing a lot of pain. 
  • The Reebok Flashfilm 2.0  requires a break-in period, according to a runner.

Bottom line

Designed to provide long-lasting comfort, the Reebok Flashfilm 2.0 ensures a high level of cushioning and protection during the entire running session. This stylish running shoe incorporates top quality materials, which deliver breathability, flexibility, comfort, and versatility. It is a neutral running shoe that is suitable for runners who do not overpronate. This shoe is also perfect for work, gym sessions, and casual walks.

Tip: see the best running shoes.

User reviews:

Good to know

  • The Reebok Flashfilm 2.0 is an improved road running shoe that provides outstanding support and comfort for everyday wear. This running gear is updated with a two-tone mesh upper that provides a stylish and clean look to the shoe. 
  • The Die-Cut EVA sockliner is another important update that improves the overall cushioning system of the Reebok Flashfilm 2.0. It offers adequate support to prevent muscle or foot injuries while running or exercising. 
  • This running companion now uses a unique clam-shell tongue, providing a snugger fit and preventing the heel from slipping out the shoe.

The Reebok Flashfilm 2.0 was designed using the standard running shoe measurements when it comes to its length. The addition of the sockliner and clam-shell tongue construction provide a more comfortable feel. The shoe’s lacing system also allows for a customized fit. Runners are welcome to get a pair in their usual sizing expectations, though it is advisable to fit the shoe first or check the general feedback about the shoe’s sizing to ensure perfect feet. 

The outsole section of the Reebok Flashfilm 2.0 utilizes a lightweight rubber material, which aims to provide reliable traction on varied surfaces. This outsole material makes the shoe flexible and responsive to the foot without sacrificing cushioning and durability. It also provides reliable traction on various surfaces. 

The rubber outsole features an impressive lug pattern that enhances the shoe’s gripping ability in wet conditions. 

Reebok Flashfilm 2.0’s midsole is wrapped in Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) film for a bolder look. The TPU is a unique component, making the midsole super soft and elastic. It is resistant to abrasion, oil, grease and wear-and-tear. Some shoes like the Merrell Trail Glove 5 use the TPU as an overlay for added protection. 

The FlashFilm technology is integrated into the midsole of this Reebok running shoe to make the platform more responsive to the foot. This component also enhances the shoe’s sidewall aesthetics. 

The Die-Cut EVA sockliner in the midsole unit of Reebok Flashfilm 2.0 is a cushy yet supportive foam material. This sockliner offers great arch support and protection from impact causing muscle pains and foot injuries. It is a highly durable material that is designed to withstand strong forces. 

The Reebok Flashfilm 2.0 features a two-tone mesh upper that provides a cleaner and more stylish look to the shoe. The mesh upper material not only offers breathability but also improves the shoe’s structural durability. 

This running companion also uses the unique clam-shell tongue construction, which provides additional comfort and improves the shoe’s overall look. 

How Flashfilm 2.0 compares

This shoe: 79
All shoes average: 82
56 95
This shoe: $80
All shoes average: $119
$40 $300
Ready to buy?
Author
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen

Jens Jakob is a fan of short distances with a 5K PR at 15:58 minutes. Based on 35 million race results, he's among the fastest 0.2% runners. Jens Jakob previously owned a running store, when he was also a competitive runner. His work is regularly featured in The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC and the likes as well as peer-reviewed journals. Finally, he has been a guest on +30 podcasts on running.

jens@runrepeat.com