Facts

  • Terrain

    Road

    Shoes best for road, track and light gravel. See the best road shoes.

    Trail

    Shoes best for trail, off road, mountains and other unstable surfaces. See the best trail shoes.

    Good to know

    As long as you stick to the road or path, and if you want just one running shoe, buy a road running shoe.

  • Arch support

    Neutral / cushion / high arch

    Shoes for runners who do not need any additional arch support (Around 50% of runners). Best for people with normal, high or medium high arches. See the best neutral shoes.

    Stability / overpronation / normal arch

    Shoes for runners who need mild to moderate arch support (Around 45% of runners). Best for runners with a low arch. See the best stability shoes.

    Motion control / severe overpronation / flat feet

    Shoes for runners who needs a lot of arch support. Best for runners with flat feet. See the best motion control shoes.

    Good to know

    - Rule of thumb: If in doubt, buy neutral shoes to avoid injuries.
    - More about arch support in this video.
    - Find your arch type by following steps from this video.

  • Use

    Daily running

    Cushioned shoes for your daily easy running. Great comfort. See best shoes for daily running.

    Competition

    Lightweight shoes good for races, interval training, tempo runs and fartlek. Here are the best competition running shoes.

    Good to know

    If you want just one pair of shoes, buy a shoe for daily running.

  • Price
    $120
  • Weight
    Men: 7.5oz
    Women: 6.2oz
  • Heel to toe drop
    Men: 6mm
    Women: 6mm

    The height difference from the heel to the forefoot, also known as heel drop, toe spring, heel to toe spring or simply drop.

    There are many opinions about what a good heel drop is. We do not recommend any in particular. Lean more in this video.

  • Width
    Men: Standard, Wide, Extra wide
    Women: Standard, Wide
  • Release date
    Unknown
Show more facts

Rankings

Expert Reviews

Experts are runners, who post reviews at youtube, directly at RunRepeat or at their own websites. Each expert is categorized from level 1 to level 5 based on expertise. See stats on expert reviews and how we calculate scores here.

Are you an expert? Apply to contribute here.

93 / 100 based on 10 expert reviews

  • 97 / 100 | Robert Landauer

    New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon - The holy grail

    Advertised weight: 7.6 oz (size not specified)
    Real weight: 7.5 oz (Men’s 9.5)
    Drop: 6 mm
    Tagline: “Run and have fun in the uniquely cushioned feel of the Fresh Foam Beacon.”

     

    Fit

    There are many superlatives that could be used to describe the fit, but the one that feels most appropriate is “perfect”. By the time I’d finished tying the laces, I was in love.

    Sizing is spot on. Aside from a too-wide forefoot (I’m patiently waiting for that trend to die), it felt like someone built the last with my feet specifically in mind. Physically, I have slightly low arches, but for one reason or another, I feel as if every pair of shoes needs higher arches.

    These are among the few that feel supportive enough in that area. The shoe essentially cradles your foot but also gives you enough room to move around. It’s exactly what you’re looking for in an intimate partner: plenty of support, and also plenty of freedom.

    Upper

    The upper of the Beacon is the most minimalist I’ve used. Absolutely no overlays and only one seam. This is a good thing.

    You might think this would result in a sloppy fit, but quite the opposite. The knit material gives it a stretchiness that holds your foot snug all-around without any tight spots. It’s also the most breathable running shoe I’ve ever had.

     

     

    Even the shoelaces share a lot of the good qualities of the upper. When these shoes go into retirement, I’m keeping the shoelaces and using them on whatever shoes come with bad ones.

    Tread

    The tread pattern on the Beacon is a little unusual, almost more similar to what you might find on a trail runner. I’ve only taken these off-road a couple of times, and while they do fine on maintained trails, I wouldn’t necessarily recommend them for trail running. There are other shoes for that.

    On road, the tread performs well. A good tread is one you don’t have to think about. You don’t even notice these.

     

     

    The overwhelming majority of the outsole is exposed foam, with only a few small panels of rubber covering key high-wear areas.

    New Balance claims the new foam found in the Beacon is harder-wearing, so the exposed foam should last the lifetime of the shoe. I haven’t come close to wearing these shoes out yet, but so far, there’s no reason to doubt this claim.

    Cushion

    This is perhaps where the Beacon shines brightest. These are the lightest, fastest shoes I’ve ever had, as well as among the shoes that have provided the best support and cushion, and they’re the same shoe. It’s almost unfair how much cushion New Balance has gotten out of a shoe in this weight class.

     

     

    A glance at the shoe makes it obvious there’s a high volume of foam involved, but somehow, it checks in at 7.5 oz. Its light weight is accomplished in large part by cutting down on overlays and outsole rubber, but...goodness. Before trying these on, I wouldn’t have thought a shoe like this was possible.

    Ride

    The Beacon manages to be both smooth and bouncy at the same time, in all the best ways. The outsole has a convex shape to it that encourages rolling through the heel-toe transition, and the cushioning feels less like running in sand and more like jumping on a trampoline. Each step you take springs your forward into the next, while your brain goes, “How about another?”

    The industry catch phrase these days is “Energy Return”, and while many manufacturers have made progress here, the Fresh Foam Beacon is the one that’s managed to accomplish what everyone is trying to do.

    Design/Looks

    Overall, I like it. New Balance decided to (almost) stick to solids, and for that, I give a thumbs up. Also, the logos on both sides of the shoe are reflective, so they serve a practical purpose. From those of us that have 9-5 jobs and have to train in the dark, thank you.

    A couple gripes: The outsole is white. *long sigh* That’s the worst possible color in the worst possible place. It’s not going to stay white.

    I’m not a fan of the fish scale pattern. In low lighting, it doesn’t look bad, but that’s only because you can’t see it. When you can tell what it looks like, it looks bad. I chose black primarily so the fish scales would be less evident. A solid pattern, all one color, would be a huge improvement.

    Also, there aren’t enough color options, and half the colors available look bad.

    Overall impression

    New Balance has found the Holy Grail. Any runner knows when you get a shoe with good cushion, you sacrifice speed. When you get something supportive, you sacrifice flexibility. When you get something minimalist, you sacrifice support. And when you get something fast, you sacrifice comfort. The Fresh Foam Beacon has it all.

    The Fresh Foam Beacon is appropriate for any distance from 5k to a marathon, and probably beyond. My fastest half marathon and second-fastest marathon were both run in this shoe. After the marathon, I felt so great, I went hiking later that day.

    Get these if you want to run faster. Or more comfortably. Or (and this is my favorite) more effortlessly.

    Out of 100, I’m taking off three points. The forefoot is too wide, the fish scale pattern looks bad, and the outsole is white. But I’m nitpicking, and two of those three are a matter of taste (white outsoles are an objectively dumb idea). 

    Give the Beacon 2 a new coat of paint and it’ll be perfect.

    Best Use

    Pavement, fast training, general training, any distance 5-100 km, PRs!

    Pro

    Nearly everything

    Cons

    White outsole, colors, and design could be better

    This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.

  • 93 / 100 | Matthew Leonard

    New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon – Simplicity and versatility

    According to Da Vinci, “simplicity is the ultimate sophistication,” and if that’s true, then the New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon is an incredibly sophisticated shoe.

    I’m sure that plenty of research and development has gone into the production of the Beacon, but the result is a simple, light, well-priced shoe that provides everything that I could ask of a road shoe: cushioning and comfort through long runs and responsiveness at faster paces. 

     

    Pros           

    • Lightweight (213g)
    • Excellent cushioning
    • Comfortable, breathable upper
    • Versatile daily shoe

    Cons

    • Neutral runners only
    • Durability not yet proven

    Introduction

    In recent months, I’ve run a lot of miles in a New Balance Fresh Foam shoes, with mixed results. The Fresh Foam Zante is my road shoe for every occasion and has been my go-to shoe for fast running and races - everything from 5k to marathon.

    By comparison, the 1080 v8 was reliable and durable but not particularly exciting. And despite being a road shoe, I’ve relegated it to runs on light trails.

     

     

    The Fresh Foam Beacon promised to be every bit as exciting and responsive as the Zante while providing a little more cushioning underfoot, and an even lighter build. All this with a price tag of £90 amongst a range of running shoes priced at £120-150.

    With a marathon coming up, I was really looking forward to trying this one out.

    Appearance

    New Balance offers the men’s Fresh Foam Beacon in three colorways: essentially black, petrol and electric blue. It may not be a huge choice, but I really liked the petrol (with a hint of “flame” on the inside of the tongue and the rubber outsole).

    It’s a great looking shoe which essentially comprises of a very simple knitted mesh upper glued onto a slab of New Balance’s new Ground Contact Foam. The upper feels extremely soft, with minimal overlays — almost the antithesis of some of today’s seemingly over-engineered shoes such as the 1080v8.

     

     

    I was pleased to see that the “N” logo (the only overlay used) is very reflective – ideal for me as we approach winter and much of my running will be on dark, narrow country lanes in North Wales.

    Visually, what strikes you most about the shoe when you first pick it up is the exposed foam midsole/outsole with its contrasting colored lugs.

     

    Weight

    This is one area in which the simple construction really shows. The Fresh Foam Beacon is listed as 213g (7.5oz), which despite all the cushioning provided is pretty close to the weight of New Balance’s 1400v6 racing shoe at 204g, and save a good chunk of weight off the Fresh Foam Zante v4 at 244g (8.6 oz).

    As expected, my UK 13.5 (US14) shoe weighed in heavier than the standard shoe, at 267g, but the lightest shoe I have run in.

     

     

    What is always more important than the numbers are how light the Beacon feels on the foot. It is barely noticeable when running despite the big chunk of foam underfoot that cushions every footfall.

    Even towards the end of a marathon when everything else was hurting, the shoe still felt exceptionally light, and my footfalls didn’t feel as heavy as they often do when the finish line refuses to get any closer.

    Fit

    As with all New Balance shoes, I find that I need a ½ size larger (in UK size) than my normal size. The shoe then fit comfortably right out of the box.

    In this case, I wear a UK 13.5 (US 14) which is the same size I’ve used in all other New Balance shoes, Hokas, and Salomon Trail. For comparison, I generally use a UK13 in Brooks, Inov-8, and Asics, though the last two can feel a little snug.

     

     

    US readers, please note that despite the variation in sizing across manufacturers, I almost always require a US 14/EU 49. It’s quite possible that the differences in sizes, therefore, are due to conversions from US to UK sizing.

    The foot slides into the shoe and feels comfortable right from the start. The upper is so simple that there isn’t anything for the foot to dislike. Just lace them up to your preference and hit the road.

    My very first run in these shoes was a 16-mile marathon training run (at marathon pace), and I did exactly that; slipped on the shoe, laced it up and ran with no need to stop and adjust the shoe or lacing at any point.

    Despite the simple upper, the foot seems well held throughout on either long runs or faster interval sessions.

     

     

    Following a marathon race in these shoes, I found that the big toe and second toe had sustained some light bruising (and a blackened nail). I’m still not entirely sure whether this was due to some forward foot movement during the run (there were no steep descents, so that’s unlikely) or more likely. The shoe is slightly shorter than other NB shoes. If you have any doubt, I’d, therefore, suggest going up ½ a size

    The toe box is also a little narrower than other New Balance shoes in which I’ve run to the extent that I experienced a mild flare-up of Morton’s Neuroma after each of the first few runs. The shoe did, however, seem to give a little in the toe box with use, and it was no longer an issue after the first 30 miles with the shoe.

    Construction

    Upper

    The upper is made up of an incredibly simple “circular knit mesh” that wraps the foot with minimal overlays. The over-riding philosophy for the design of this shoe could be the age-old management adage “keep it simple, stupid.”

     

     

    I’m still not entirely sure what type of mesh forms the upper. It feels more akin to fabric than an engineered mesh. It has very little elasticity which helps to maintain a comfortable fit around the foot once you’ve laced up and has a soft, comfortable feel which is at odds with most mesh uppers used elsewhere.

    Despite this, it is a very breathable upper, and effectively wicks away moisture, seemingly managing to exhibit the attributes of both engineered mesh and fabric. Around the forefoot, the upper is comprised of a single layer of mesh, strengthened a little around the toe cap with a thin layer of foam.

     

     

    Moving further back, the midfoot incorporates a bootie which holds the tongue in place, and which plays a part in wrapping the foot comfortably and securely. This is further supported by the only significant overlays, in the form of the “N” logo, and which are positioned to provide an element of support to the midfoot further.

    The tongue is well cushioned, and is similar in feel and cushioning to the Zante v4. The lace holes are formed using a thin, flexible overlay for each hole. This is also used to provide a little detail around the laced section.

     

     

    The cushioning around the ankle and heel is more than sufficient to hold the heel comfortably. If anything, the Beacon offers slightly more cushioning here than the Zante v4, with the cushioning extending a little further down towards the sole. 

    The heel cup doesn’t have the hard, plasticky feel that other shoes can exhibit, but feels as if the knit upper has been strengthened just enough to hold the heel in firmly, but comfortably.

    The Fresh Foam Beacon is very much a neutral shoe while the simple knitted upper wraps the footwell. There is a minimal amount of support provided, and I’d suggest that it is therefore only suitable for runners who want a truly neutral shoe.

    Midsole

    The midsole of the Beacon is formed of a single slab of New Balance’s “Ground Contact” Fresh Foam.  The Ground Contact Fresh Foam is designed to be more durable than other versions while retaining cushioning. This eliminates the need for anything other than a very minimal element of a rubber outsole (more of that below).

     

     

    The heel drop of 6mm is similar to the Fresh Foam Zante. So essentially, the Beacon has a very light and generous slice of foam glued onto a simple upper, with a few rubber lugs to limit wear on key areas of the sole. I hear echoes of the “keep it simple, stupid” mantra again.

    There is, of course, a little more to it as with other Fresh Foam shoes, there are hexagonal patterns along the sides of the midsole. The concave hexagons on the outside allow the foam to compress more, providing greater cushioning, while the convex shapes on the inside cause the foam to compress less, offering greater support.

    So how does it feel? In my experience, New Balance Fresh Foam seems to have the ability to change character depending upon the costume it wears. In the 1080v8, it cushions reasonably well but plays a dull, unresponsive role in the running experience.

    In the Zante, it provides an impressive balance of cushioning and responsiveness. It may feel a little stiff to some, but I love the shoe, and a bit more cushion underfoot.

     

     

    In the midsole of the Beacon, the Fresh Foam gives its best performance yet. It provides a level of cushioning consistent with a Hoka or a Brooks Ghost, delivering the flexibility and responsiveness required for tempo sessions and intervals in a package that could compete with a racing flat regarding weight.

    Outsole

    New Balance development of their Ground Contact Fresh Foam has allowed them to join Adidas and Nike in presenting their “exposed foam” running shoe. In the case of the Beacon, the largely exposed foam sole is reinforced by 5 single rubber lugs located in the areas of highest wear: the heel and toe off.

    The lugs are thick and durable, but also feel soft and cushioned to the touch. There’s little more to say about the outsole, but in the case of the Beacon, what’s more, important is what is not there.

    I’m sure that it’s the absence of a full length blown rubber outsole in this shoe that allows the Fresh Foam to deliver its superior mix of cushioning, responsiveness and flexibility.

     

    Durability

    I’m sure that this is going to be a real concern for anyone considering the purchase of the Fresh Foam Beacon. I cannot honestly say how many miles I’ll get out of my Beacons. All I can do is report on my experience so far.

    At the time these pictures were taken, I’d run approximately 70 miles in the shoe, including a full marathon race (I’m an 87kg/190lbs heel striker), and to be honest, there is very little wear showing to date. The lateral lug on the heel, as expected, shows the most wear (as shown below), whilst the rubber lugs at the front still show the light pattern which is part of the design.

     

     

    Most importantly, the foam itself is barely worn other than a little sign of wear right at the front of the shoe from taking off. I will be wearing these shoes for a variety of runs in the weeks ahead and will update this review with my experience as I clock up the miles.

    I would be surprised however if the shoe did not last to around at least 400km and longer for lighter runners. I feel that these shoes would not stand up well on hard packed or gravel trails.

     

    Performance

    Running shoes are highly personal, and so my experience of shoe performance should always be balanced against my own characteristics. I can’t speak for the front of a pack runner, but hope my views will be useful for both club runners and newer runners, as well as those on the heavier side.

    To put my running in perspective, at the time of writing, I’m 47, about 6’2”, around 87kg (190lbs), running 50-60 miles pw. I tested the Beacons in a marathon race run in 3:13, and a recent Parkrun clocked me just under 19’ for the 5k.

    You may have already guessed that I really liked these shoes. I’d hoped that they arrive in time for me to use them in the Chester Marathon, and they turned up on the day before my last long run. As mentioned above, I put them on and set off.

    At that point in my marathon training cycle, there’s a lot of fatigue built up over some high mileage training weeks, and I was ready to ease off before the race. I’m sure you’ll appreciate the appeal of a highly cushioned, but light pair of shoes.

     

     

    The Beacons didn’t disappoint. That first session involved one hour out, just a little outside marathon pace, followed by a faster return at sub-marathon pace. The cushioning was unbelievable in such a light shoe, and yet somehow I didn’t feel disconnected from the road, perhaps because of the lack of a traditional rubber outsole.

    During the return leg, I felt fresher than I had any right to after an hour running and came back well inside my marathon pace. Over the last couple of years, my marathon training cycle has incorporated the Brooks Ghost for longer slower runs, and the Fresh Foam Zante for faster intervals and marathon paced runs. For those last few weeks, the Beacons replaced the Zante v4 for faster, and marathon paced sessions.

    To cut a long story short, the Beacons did a great job for my marathon. They offered everything that the Zante had previously done, but the additional cushioning was very welcome in the later stages of the race, reducing fatigue caused by the pounding of the feet on the road for 26 miles. So far so good, but how about faster sessions?

    This is where the Beacon really surprised me. It came alive for me when the speed increased. Just two days after the marathon I slipped them on for a recovery run, and feeling good after a couple of miles, decided to try some faster intervals.

    Even on tired legs, I found it easy to ramp up to 5k pace and faster for half a dozen stretches. The response was far better than I expected from the chunk of foam that makes up the midsole, and the transitions from landing to take off were impressively fast.

    Even at faster speeds, the Ground Contact Fresh Foam is effective at reducing the impact of each footfall to the extent that I felt surprisingly light on my feet in a way that I haven’t with other shoes. All this without feeling as if I’d lost contact with the ground.

    Sockliner

    Just a quick note about the sock liner, as this has been an issue in the last Zante v4 in which I eventually resorted to gluing down the liner to prevent it folding up underfoot during wet weather.

     

     

    The Beacon seems to use the same sock liner as the Zante v3 which performed well and in which I didn’t experience any movement. For a brief moment at 8 miles in the marathon, I felt the front of the liner fold a little under my toes, but it moved back of its own accord after a mile or two, and I didn’t have any further movement.

    But I needed to be sure, so I deliberately took the Beacons out in the worst weather we’ve had for several months, and ensured the shoes were thoroughly wet by running through a ford. A long ascent, and short, fast windy descent later I can confirm that the liner did not move at all in the shoe.

    Summary

    At its heart, running is an incredibly simple activity. In an era of technology and over-engineered shoes, the simplicity of the Fresh Foam Beacon provides a real breath of fresh air and makes it a real joy to run in.

    In my opinion, Fresh Foam performs flawlessly in its Ground Contact guise. It offers a level of cushioning that can take you through a marathon while allowing you to turn up the pace for a faster interval session.

    It offers a level of cushioning comparable to Brooks Ghost with the flexibility and responsiveness of a Zante that will deliver for those faster sessions, all in a package that could compete with a racing flat in terms of weight.

     

     

    Up until now, the Zante has been my “all-around shoe of choice”. Now the Beacon and the Zante are very different shoes, but for me, they both fulfill a very similar role; that of a real all-around running shoe that can “turn on” to a faster pace as well as grind out the longer miles.

    So whilst my hand may hover momentarily between the two shoes, the lightness and additional cushioning will now see me reach for the Beacon in preference to the Zante.

    This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.

  • 91 / 100 | Niall Jordan

    New Balance Beacon: Signalling a new hope for Fresh Foam

    The New Balance Beacon is a highly cushioned shoe utilising a ‘new’ variant of the proprietary Fresh Foam midsole known as GC (ground contact).

    Up until now, most with Fresh Foam shoes have left me and others rather nonplussed. Lacking responsiveness in contrast to the excellent but firmer Rev-lite midsole, this shoe changes things.

    The Look

    Out of the box, they look great. The midsole is thick but not quite as big as it appears in online pictures. The first thing that strikes you is how light these shoes are: my UK size 9 weighs in at 218g, and they feel just as light on your feet.

     

     

    The ample stack height has a heel to toe drop of 6mm. The upper is an engineered mesh that looks good, I usually prefer an ‘old school’ look, but the pattern in the ‘Petrol’ colourway almost resembles fish scales.

    Fit

    The lacing is exceptionally comfortable, this is an area I often struggle with given a high cuneiform bone, but the tongue and laces sit perfectly without too much pressure on the top of the foot.

     

     

    The laces are flat, a little stretchy and don’t need much adjustment at all, they are a real lace up and go shoe. Typical for New Balance they fit on the smaller side, I went half a size up, and that fitted comfortably.

    Mid and outsole

    The midsole is thick Fresh Foam GC; there is virtually no outsole, just a few strategically placed pieces of rubber and the heel and forefoot, reminiscent of the Nike Free 4.0. Images below show Beacon on the left and Nike Free 4.0  on the right.

     

     

    Traction and grip is surprisingly good, and similarly, the expanse of exposed foam doesn’t seem to be showing any wear after 50km.

    Ride

    Despite the previous superlatives, the best part of these shoes is the ride. Normally I prefer a firmer midsole, but every so often it’s good to pamper your feet.

    The Beacon gives a cushioned soft ride, you can feel the foam compressing gently, but the fantastic thing is it springs right back rebounding the energy to your legs. It’s not bouncy like Adidas Boost or squishy like Lunarlon, but just right. It feels great to walk on, but as you pick up the pace slowly, it comes to the fore, even at medium to faster paces it is very responsive.

    The heel has a bit of a slant, and the sole is rocker shaped but very flexible in all planes, it encourages a midfoot landing and a quick transition to toe off. The closest shoe I’ve run in is Skechers GOrun Ride 7, the Beacon, however, feels more stable, in part due to a better structured upper.

    Stability comes from the overlays in the upper; the arch support is reasonably low. I’d recommend the Beacon for longer mileage and recovery runs, and although I know some people who also rate it for speed work I prefer something with more ground feel.

    Conclusion

    Occasionally you come across a shoe that is a real treat to wear; the Beacon is that and more. I was trying out the New Balance Vongo immediately after running in the Beacon, and it felt like running with my feet in massive blocks of polystyrene.

    This isn’t perhaps a fair comparison as the Vango is a stability shoe nonetheless it emphasized how light and fun it was to run in the Beacon. For me, this shoe is a steal even at the MRP, given that it can often be found cheaper online it’s a no-brainer.

    This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.

  • 84 / 100 | Jeff Hinson

    New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon - Reaching for greatness

    The New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon is a very comfortable, lightweight, neutral running shoe, which is fairly versatile and a pleasure to go fast in. 

    It’s a great building block for New Balance to improve upon, as it’s nearly an amazing light daily trainer or even a race day shoe, but there are a few significant drawbacks.

     

    Key specs

              Weight           213g (or 7.51oz)
              Drop           6mm
              Stack height            20mm (forefoot), 26mm (heel)

    What I Like 

    Feel

    Overall, the shoe has a really nice feel to it, from the sock-like knit upper to the springy foam, a nicely flexible sole with a comfortable drop - things just work quite harmoniously in this shoe (given the right conditions). 

    The feeling of wearing a shoe that simply adds what is necessary for a good running experience, which is not as common as it should be, especially in this age of carbon plates, foam wars and gimmicks, makes the Beacon seems like something special. 

    The 6mm drop provides a nice balance, getting you to work a little bit for the pace, which makes this a good shoe for training sessions. 

    Style

    I really like the ‘look’ of this shoe, as I’m a big fan of simple design, as well as geometric two-tone patterning. The Beacon has these elements building what is for me a retro-future ‘personality’. 

    Despite the presence of the Hoka-esque bright white midsole, it doesn’t seem or feel quite as pronounced when on foot. 

    From a design perspective, the Beacon has a strong, yet sleek, identity and it’s hard to dislike, as it’s not too flashy or overdone. 

     

     

    Any problems I have with the upper, are simply performance-based, which I’ll get into later. 

    Lastly, I love the subtle pink highlights under the tongue and on the pieces of the rubber outsole. It’s always a big plus for me to feel like someone was paying attention to the details.

    Cushioning

    This has been my first full foray into the realm of that firm injection-molded EVA foam, or ‘responsive’ foam as some call it. It is truly a pleasure to run on, especially for pushing the pace, but it definitely takes some open-mindedness if you’re not used to it. 

    The Beacons did feel fine out of the box, so no points off there, but a little bit of ‘break-in’ time was definitely helpful. I haven’t run in many New Balance shoes before.

    The best comparison I can draw from the feel of the shoe is from trying on the Hoka One One Mach’s, which had that lightweight and responsive feel. But to be honest, I wasn’t ready for that amount of firmness at that moment. 

     

     

    The Machs just felt too hard and almost as if the cushion was entirely lacking when I tried them on in the shop, especially compared to the shoes I was running in at the time (the Brooks Ghost 9s, Nike Zoom Elite 9s, and Adidas Supernova GTX). 

    Fast forward a bit, and after trying these on, I decided to take the plunge, and do not regret it at all. 

    Additionally, it seems that the ample cushioning level would apply across the spectrum of foot-strike styles - so a mid/forefoot striker like myself, or a heel striker would enjoy the ‘ride’ of these.

    Ground feel

    Considering the amount of Fresh Foam between one’s foot and the ground/road, there’s a surprising amount of feeling, which I definitely have been enjoying. 

    The flipside is that sometimes you can feel some twigs, bigger rocks or other hard objects, so one does need to be a little careful while running trails.

    Things I don’t like 

    Traction

    The traction, while not being awful, definitely had some distinct variation on surfaces - they felt better on pavement or ground, while on certain types of stone there was a bit of uncertainty. 

    More than slipperiness, the shoes do not provide the ‘grippy’ feeling that aids in propulsion, so I really hope they add a bit of rubber on future iterations, even if it would add a little weight. 

    It may not seem like much, but the lack of grip that I noticed in my stride, means a finite amount of extra effort, and therefore effectively prevents this shoe from working efficiently with the runner.

    Breathability

    The upper is not the best in terms of moisture retention or breathability, which is great for Spring, Fall, and milder Winter runs, but I can imagine that these will become sweat boxes in the Summer. 

    Again, this depends on one's feet and how prone to sweating they are. I definitely need quite a breathable upper in the Summer months, and Berlin tends to be mild, so I can only imagine running in New York or Florida with these on muggy days probably wouldn’t work so well (but to be fair, I haven’t tried). 

     

     

    This isn’t a deal breaker, but it does limit the scope of the shoe, making it less of an all-rounder than say, the Nike Zoom Elite 9. 

    As for moisture retention, the upper feels like it soaks up water when it’s raining out, and instead of releasing it, it just holds onto it, kind of like a thin wet blanket.

    Once again, just an area New Balance will hopefully work on with the next iteration, and something to consider for those living in fairly rainy climates, who don’t want to have too many shoes laying around for specific weather conditions.

    Insoles

    This was the biggest issue I had with the shoes, and where they lost the most points for me, I had serious insole slippage in both shoes, which was solved easily enough, by purchasing some super glue and gluing them into the shoes. 

    However, I feel like that shouldn’t happen, especially in a shoe that retails for over one hundred Euros (or Dollars). I don’t believe that one should either have to purchase other companies' insoles or glue in the provided insole to make them usable because for me it was impossible to continue running with the ones provided. 

    The insoles are pretty thin and flimsy, and possibly due to the lack of structure they would continuously slide from under my feet and creep up the back of the shoe, to the point where I would have to stop and readjust them a few times a run, which becomes annoying fairly quickly. 

     

     

    I glued them in, knowing that doing so could limit some of the other insole options down the line, but it was simply impossible to keep on running with them as is. 

    Now, to be fair, I’m not sure if this was just a fluke, but it did happen in both of my shoes and I have heard of this happening in one other review. So, it may not be widespread, but given the flimsy nature of the insole, it seems like something for potential buyers to be aware of.

    Durability

    As you can see from this picture after a hundred and three kilometers (about sixty-four miles) of running primarily on the pavement, the Beacons are showing a bit of wear on both the rubber and the exposed foam.

    Nothing to be alarmed over, but it does make me think that they will not last a full eight hundred kilometers (about five hundred miles). This is really a minor concern, but one worth mentioning. 

    Conclusion

    This is definitely a solid performer and has the potential to fit in the line-up of someone serious enough about running to have a line-up, but with some glaring limitations, which could make the Beacons not worth it for runners in certain areas, or those who have particular uses or goals in mind.

    I’d recommend them to the runners who don’t live in an overly moist or wet climate and those who are searching for a light daily trainer to keep in the cycle, possibly even for use on race day - for a 10k or a half-marathon. 

    Also, it has been possible to pick them up on sale, as I did, so if you’re able to get them for relatively cheap, it may not matter to you that you might need to purchase a set of insoles or glue in the provided ones, or that you’ll need another pair of weatherized shoes for rainy days. 

    At the moment, I’m trying not to accumulate too many running shoes, so as limitations pop up, an alarm goes off somewhere in my brain. 

     

     

    Therefore, if you want a lightweight but versatile all-around shoe, with fewer issues, or you want to limit the number of shoes in your closet, I’d say they're better shoes out there for less, like the Nike Zoom Elite 9 (the 10th iteration is supposed to be quite similar, but I haven’t tried them yet). 

    However, if you want a responsive, light shoe to go fast in, and don’t mind the drawbacks, then this is a pretty decent one.  Underlying all of this, and whatever aspects are lacking in these shoes (no shoe is perfect), the bottom line is: the Fresh Foam Beacons are enjoyable to run in. 

    I find myself reaching for them fairly regularly, and am hopeful that New Balance will listen to some of the feedback on these and help them fulfill the potential that I and many others in the running community see in the Beacons.

    This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.

Show moreless reviews
Apply to become an expert

Updates to New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon

  • The New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon is a neutral running shoe that’s made for the roads. It’s also meant for a variety of activities like speed training and racing. When it comes to design, it brings a smooth and simple look that’s popular with many contemporary options on the market. Bright colorways make up for the lack of substantial overlays and other add-ons.
  • The upper unit features an engineered knit material. This material brings a lightweight yet secure coverage. It’s also breathable and flexible. A set of synthetic prints bolster the eyelets while the ‘N’ logo graces both sides of the façade.
  • Underfoot cushioning is the responsibility of the Fresh Foam technology. This full-length unit carries the foot throughout the running session. The high-wear points of the outer sole are reinforced by rubber.
  • For durability, the New Balance Beacon makes use of a blown rubber material. The rubber placements are strategically attached to high-wear areas for increased durability. 

New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon size and fit

The New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon is available in the usual sizes, and it follows the regular sizing expectations of consumers. The width options are D – Medium and 2E – Wide options for men, and B – Medium and D – Wide for women.

The VL-6 Last entails standard measurements in the heel and forefoot. The height of the toe box isn’t too high nor too low. It may satisfy those who have medium foot dimensions.

Outsole

Blown rubber is the material that’s used in the outsole unit of the New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon. It’s only placed in areas that are most prone to wear, specifically the lateral side of the heel and the medial side of the forefoot. Its tasks are to protect against damage and to provide surface traction.

The rest of the outsole is comprised of ground-contact foam. The textured surface heightens grip while shallow grooves enable flexibility.

Midsole

The Fresh Foam cushioning unit composes the midsole of the New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon. This full-length material offers a soft and springy ride. And though it looks like it has a substantial thickness, it doesn’t hold a lot of weight. This material is also present in the midsole of the Zante v4 and other popular New Balance running shoes.

This midsole foam offers featherweight feel while effectively disperses landing impact. This foam is lighter than the usual midsole foam and it aims to provide long-lasting cushioning throughout the run. 

Upper

The engineered knit upper offers a soft and breathable wrap.This material is also lightweight. It’s capable of bending with the foot, thereby facilitating an in-shoe experience that adapts to the gait cycle.

The overlay system is made of synthetic prints that bolster some sections of the upper, namely the eyelets and the sides. These thin add-ons help in maintaining the structural integrity of the façade.

The tongue and collar of the New Balance Fresh Foam Beacon are padded. These parts of the shoe are responsible for holding the foot in place and preventing it from wobbling or exiting the foot-chamber accidentally. They also offer additional cushioning for comfort.

The shoe has a lace-up closure, which offers the foot a secure, comfortable lockdown. Runners can easily adjust the laces to achieve the right fit. There are extra eyelets to further secure the midfoot.


Comparison