Summary

We spent 10.2 hours reading reviews from experts and users. In summary, this is what runners think:

4 reasons to buy

  • One of the testers said that the Hoka One One Cavu 2 is responsive.
  • According to those who have tried it, the shoe has a lightweight structure.
  • Some users appreciated its well-cushioned construction.
  • The footwear is also comfortable enough for long walks, based on a few reviews.

3 reasons not to buy

  • A user commented that he felt a little pain in the ankle area during the running activity.
  • One of the buyers said that the shoe is not durable
  • According to a tester, the midsole feels stiff.

Bottom line

The Hoka One One Cavu 2 made some of the wearers satisfied and happy because of its responsiveness. They admired the shoe's performance not only on running but also on walking activities. Although some of the users had issues with its stiff midsole and pain in the ankle area, others still recommend the footwear because of its well-cushioned construction. Overall, the Hoka One One gained the hearts of the consumers because of its excellent performance and responsiveness.

Facts

Terrain: Road
Arch support: Neutral
Weight: Men: 7.2oz | Women: 5.9oz
Heel to toe drop: Men: 5mm | Women: 5mm
Pronation: Neutral Pronation
Arch type: High arch
Strike Pattern: Midfoot strike
Distance: Competition
Brand: Hoka One One
Type: Low drop
Width: Men: Normal | Women: Normal
Price: $110
Colorways: Black, Blue, Grey, Multi, Purple, White
Size
Small True to size Large
See more facts

Expert Reviews

Experts are runners, who post reviews at youtube, directly at RunRepeat or at their own websites. Each expert is categorized from level 1 to level 5 based on expertise. See stats on expert reviews and how we calculate scores here.

Are you an expert? Apply to contribute here.

88 / 100 based on 3 expert reviews

  • 92 / 100 | Sean Kiffe

    Hoka One One Cavu 2: Light, light, light and responsive...Did I mention light?

    More photos

    Naming a shoe after a lightweight single person aircraft seems appropriate for a company that boasts the slogan ̈time to fly. ̈  Weighing in at 7.2oz, a full ounce lighter than the first iteration, the Hoka One One Cavu 2 is the lightest running shoe I've ever owned (however not the lightest offered by Hoka).

    Something about them just screams racing flat, and the impulse to run fast in these shoes is overwhelming. 

     

     

    My first run out in these was intended to be an easy couple mile jog, but it quickly turned into a speedy sub-20 min. 5K. The Cavu 2 is light, fast and nimble, yet boasts enough of the trademark Hoka cushion to keep things comfy.

    Specs

    Category: Road

    Type: Stability

    Drop: 5mm

    Wt.: 7.2oz

    Fit

    Right out of the box, the Cavu 2 felt like home. The fit is true to size, and the initial feel was comfortable and slightly pliable, almost broken in.

    The one-piece seamless mesh upper creates a nice airy wrap for the foot. Combined with the lycra comfort-fit bootie, your foot feels snug and secure in the comfortable, lightweight package surrounding the foot.

    The toe-box is on the narrow side, so beware of this if youŕe partial to a roomier fit. I typically like a little more room, but with the Cavu 2, I didn't mind the snug feel at all.

    The pliable lycra material allows your toes to do what they need to without rigid restriction. Given that this is a shoe geared for fast-paced road running with high foot turnover rates, it makes sense that you would want a snug forefoot.

     

     

    The tongue is gusseted and ties into the partial bootie that wraps the midfoot. The gusseted tongue is always a welcome feature to see on running shoes as it helps keep the tongue in place.

    Performance

    The Cavu 2 is one of the most responsive shoes I've run in. The shoe is exceptionally adept at adjusting the changes in direction on pavement at a fast pace. The PROFLY™ midsole rubberized foam gives enough cushioning to feel a little forgiving but not so much as to inhibit a quick foot return during high cadence running.

    The upper keeps your feet cool with well thought out ventilation. The upper also cradles the foot nicely, keeping it stable above the sole and in place during lateral movement.

     

     

    The X-shape design of the sole gives ample grip and traction on pavement and asphalt alike. I also did some 200m repeats in these shoes on the local high school track, and these shoes thrived on that surface.

    In the early morning September rain, the shoe held its own, with a reliable grip on wet cement and asphalt alike. The shoe doesn't get overkill on cushioning in the upper material, and in the wet conditions, this was a godsend. No water logging with the Cavu 2!

     

     

    Track athletes should take note of whether or not the colorways match their team colors. The Cavu 2 ́s is a superlative choice for tempo runs and speed work.

    The Cavu 2 ́s would be a great choice for shorter distance racing and even distances up to a ½ marathon. However, I'm not sure how they would fair in the marathon for the average runner.

    My caution stems from speculating on how long the cushioning will retain its performance on the long course. For someone like me who is bound to be (on my best day) out on the marathon course for 3:30 to 3:45 a shoe with more cushioning would be nice.

    That said, the Cavu is perfect for shorter distances, and on my longest run in them yet (12 miles), I didn't notice any change in the amount of perceived cushion.

    Pros

    • Lightweight
    • Responsive

    Cons

    • The longevity of cushion for longer distances

    Overall

    The Cavu 2 is a great shoe for anyone looking for a lightweight performer that is ready to tear up speed work or shorter distance races.

     

     

    With just enough cushion to keep things comfortable, the Cavu still excels at being responsive and feeling agile. The Cavu 2 is light and wears like a racing flat, and in fact, that's my intended use for it this fall.

    From speed workouts, track sessions to 10K ́s the Cavu 2 is certain to come through. The simple, unassuming design and stylish look make the Cavu 2 an easy choice. With an MSRP of $110.00, the Cavu 2 is pretty affordable.

    This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.

  • 88 / 100 | Jake Boesch

    Hoka One One Cavu 2: An absolute joy (once broken in)

    More photos

    Over the past month, I have started to rebuild my mileage base after surgery kept me out for a while. As I’ve progressed from one to six-mile runs, I’ve had time to form an honest impression of the Hoka One One Cavu 2.

    The shoe feels flat and unresponsive during the first few miles, but quickly breaks in and becomes an excellent everyday trainer and tempo shoe that encourages runners to pick up the pace.

     

    The Hoka One One Cavu 2 has a minimal upper and subtle branding.

    Looks

    The Cavu 2 has a simple yet effective design. The unobtrusive branding and blue/orange colorway on the pair I received work well together. I appreciate it when a shoe maintains a low-profile design with seemingly high-quality materials.

    Moreso, I am not a fan of Hoka’s traditional aesthetic concerning the massive midsole; however, the Cavu 2 nicely balances the upper and midsole to make a good-looking shoe in the $110 price range.

     

    The shoe features a five-millimeter drop from heel to forefoot, which leads to an efficient stride.

     

    There are some fit discrepancies amongst reviewers. I ordered a half size down, and it felt a little too snug. I’d recommend true to size.

    Fit

    Before I got the Cavu 2 to test, I read other reviews that recommend buyers size down a half size. I followed their advice and am not sure it was merited.

    My Cavu 2s just barely fit in the half size down. And, I frequently feel my toes push up against the front.

    The width feels spot-on, which could be why some reviews suggested the half-size down. My heel stays locked in, and I experienced no hot spots, which have been a problem for me in other Hoka shoes, such as the Clifton 3.

    I’d encourage buyers to try the shoe on to get the perfect fit, but I think true-to-size would work well for most people unless you have narrow feet.

     

    The mesh upper leaves plenty of room in the forefront without sacrificing foot lockdown.

    Upper

    The upper on the Cavu 2 secured my foot well and did not cause any discomfort. The mesh was breathable and has held together nicely over the past several miles.

     

    The Cavu 2’s midsole feels dull and concrete-like for the first few miles, but once it breaks in, it offers a smooth and comfortable ride.

    Midsole

    The Cavu 2 has a strange midsole. On my first run, I expected a bit softer and springier feel than I experienced.

    For instance, I remember thinking, these are some of the least responsive and comfortable running shoes I have tried. However, on my third run, I felt a bit more optimistic.

    The foam seemed to break in a bit and became a lot more comfortable and enjoyable. So much so that I wanted to run faster and further than I set out for.

    I now like them so much that I have put aside my Adizero Boston 8 altogether. In the Cavu 2s, my stride feels efficient, and the cushioning feels ideal for daily runs and days when I want to pick up the pace.

     

    The outsole is all exposed foam, which hurts the shoe’s traction and longevity but decreases weight.

    Outsole

    I do not like the exposed outsole of the Cavu 2. I know that it saves weight and perhaps leads to a softer ride, but it has started to rain pretty frequently in Boston, and I am not confident to wear these shoes on wet surfaces.

    They glide across the dry pavement, but I’d appreciate more grip as the changing winter approaches. Additionally, these slid a tad on mulch and packed dirt trails, which took a little bit of the snappiness out of my stride.

    Nonetheless, these are your everyday road shoes, and they performed well and dry roads and sidewalks. I will have to wait and see how the exposed cushion holds up after 50 miles.

     

    Overall, despite my gripes over the exposed outsole, break-in period, and difficult-to-nail fit, Hoka has created a daily trainer that I put on over shoes like the Adizero Boston 8.

    Summary

    The Cavu 2 has aspects that are easy for me to criticize, such as the exposed outsole, sizing discrepancies, and an initial break-in period.

    However, I enjoy my runs more than I have in a while when I am in the Cavu 2 due to its efficient ride and lightweight, which makes it an excellent choice for many runners.

    Pros

    • Great road feel once broken in
    • Quick and efficient
    • Durable mesh for the upper
    • Solid heel lockdown
    • Lightweight

    Cons

    • Exposed outsole
    • Sizing inconsistencies

    This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.

Become an expert

  • The Hoka  One One Cavu 2 is a versatile road running shoe that holds a simple and bold appearance. The footwear is strategically designed for runners who have neutral foot mechanisms. Like its predecessor, it utilizes the PROFLY midsole. This material is made from rubberized foam. It is described to be durable, light and responsive which will make the runner run faster.
  • This running shoe is comes in a seamless construction that gives runners a smoother fit. Along with the seamless construction is the open engineered mesh. Its lightweight structure aims to provide added breathability and comfortable fit.
  • When compared to the previous model, the Cavu uses the Zonal RMAT in the outsole area. Its primary role is to provide durability to the high-wear areas of the platform. RMAT is crafted using the unique blend of foam and rubber that is highly elastic.

The second installment of Cavu from Hoka One One utilizes the standard running shoe measurements. It runs true to size. The shoe is sure to provide the wearer with a more secure and snugger fit that prevents any possible slippage and injury during the run. It can surely accommodate those runners with average to low foot volume. For both men and women versions, the available width profile is medium.

A rubberized foam outsole is integrated into the Hoka One One Cavu 2. This component of the footwear is essential in providing a softer and more responsive landing without compromising its lightweight structure.  

Strategic flex points are offered by the X-shape design. This provides flexibility whenever necessary.

Better shock absorption is encouraged by the PROFLY. This material is described as a dual-density midsole that is firm in the forefoot and soft in the heel. The softness of the heel section is meant to provide extra cushioning while the firmness of the forefoot is focused on adding propulsion. As a result, a quicker heel-to-toe transition and a more comfortable landing are experienced by the runner. When compared to other midsole compounds from Hoka, the PROFLY has a higher shock attenuation capability.

Like the Bondi 6, the upper section of the Hoka One One Cavu 2  uses an open engineered mesh. This material is vital to encourage better inflow and outflow of air.

The Lycra internal lining works well with the open engineered mesh upper. It provides a seamless layer underneath and a thin layer of wrap around the foot, creating a more individualized fit. It is meant to prevent irritation and encourage a second-skin feel.

Integrated into the shoe are the thin tongue and laces. This component of the Hoka one One Cavu 2 is essential in keeping the foot in place while running.

Utilized in the shoe is the embroidered HOKA ONE ONE logo. This feature adds to the appealing design of the running shoe.

Comparison

Author
https://cdn.runrepeat.com/wp-content/uploads/jens-jakob-andersen.jpg
Jens Jakob Andersen

Jens Jakob is a fan of short distances with a 5K PR at 15:58 minutes. Based on 35 million race results, he's among the fastest 0.2% runners. Jens Jakob previously owned a running store, when he was also a competitive runner. His work is regularly featured in The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC and the likes as well as peer-reviewed journals. Finally, he has been a guest on +30 podcasts on running.

jens@runrepeat.com