Summary

We spent 8.6 hours reading reviews from experts and users. In summary, this is what runners think:

5 reasons to buy

  • Most people felt that the lightweight nature of the Brooks Neuro 3 contributed to an effortless performance on the roads.
  • The underfoot platform was deemed responsive enough to encourage energized steps.
  • The sizing scheme was considered by many to be agreeable to expectations.
  • Some consumers noted that the quality of the materials that were used in the making of this product was superior.
  • Runners also gravitated toward the sporty yet subdued aesthetics.

2 reasons not to buy

  • Several runners felt that the outsole rubber wouldn’t last long; it was apparently too soft.
  • A few people stated that the color schemes weren’t as appealing as the ones for the Neuro 2.

Bottom line

The Brooks Neuro 3 was considered by its testers to be a worthy successor to Brooks Neuro 2, its prior iteration in the relatively fresh series of road running shoes. The underfoot cushioning and the lightweight nature of the materials were considered sources of comfort. The looks of this model were also given praise. And though some doubted the lasting power of the outsole, such comments didn’t become hindrances to the overall quality of this neutral running footwear.

Facts

Expert Reviews

89 / 100 based on 2 expert reviews

  • 90 / 100 | The Active Guy | | Level 5 expert

    The all-new Brooks Neuro 3 not only looks better but feels better than its previous version.

  • 88 / 100 | Kintec | Level 3 expert

    If you don’t have enough foot strength or good running mechanics, then this may not be the right shoe for you. It is not strong enough to control a significantly overpronated foot type or give a strong enough foundation for someone wearing orthotics that are needed to help control mechanics.

  • First look | Shop Zappos |

  • First look | Shop Zappos |

Become an expert
  • The Brooks Neuro 3 boasts most of the features and technologies that graced its predecessor, the Neuro 2, but with a redesigned upper that’s more in tune with the aesthetics of the conventional athletic footwear. The forefoot section makes use of a securely woven mesh to heighten durability while an open-mesh design is used on the rear part.
  • The underfoot platform has a gearing mechanism, which means that it’s divided into two parts—the forefoot and heel. These two sections move independently during each stride, ensuring sequestered impact reception and smooth transitions. A visible propulsion plate made of TPU encourages the foot to push off the ground more efficiently.
  • A podular outsole configuration offers traction, flexibility and additional cushioning. It makes use of a soft foam that’s surrounded by a perimeter of rubber. The abrasion-resistant edges are responsible for adhesion, while the foam core doles out additional cushioning.

The Brooks Neuro 3 was created to be true to size. It makes use of the standard measurements to enable a pleasant in-shoe experience. When it comes to the width, the available profiles are B – Medium for women and D – Medium for men.

A semi-curved last accommodates the natural curvature of the human foot. Moreover, the Dynamic Hammock System—with its fabric midfoot cords—offers additional security without causing any lace-tension.

HPR Plus is the rubber compound that’s on the Brooks Neuro 3’s outer sole. It’s designed to be sturdy and to resist the abrasive nature of the asphalt.

The durable rubber exterior is configured into pods. The center of the wear-resistant perimeter is made of foam that’s meant to heighten underfoot cushioning and responsive liftoffs.

The platform opens up to reveal the underfoot last. It’s a unique look, but it’s also meant to heighten flexibility and reduce the overall weight of the shoe.

BioMoGo DNA is Brooks’ in-house cushioning unit. It is made using environment-friendly materials. Its purpose is to provide a custom underfoot experience by molding itself to the curves of the foot-pad.  This innovative midsole technology can also be seen in the Brooks Launch 6, a shoe in the same neutral road running alley as the Neuro 3.

More cushioning is given by the S-257 Cushsole. This top layer is also flexible so it won’t hinder the rest of the midsole from bending in conjunction with the wearer’s foot.

A rounded heel design serves as a smooth landing pad that resembles the u-shaped curve of the human heel.

The gearing mechanism involves splitting the rear and forefoot sections of the platform into two independent elements. This construction helps to isolate impact shock during the foot-strike and encourage a smooth heel-to-toe transition.

A propulsion plate supports the structural integrity of the platform. It also functions as a driving force that pushes the foot off the ground during the toe-off.

A segmented sock liner offers a bit more cushioning. Its grooved fascia further enables flexibility.

A Woven Mesh goes from the forefoot to the midfoot section of the Brooks Neuro 3. It’s born from an interlaced weaving process, potentially improving durability and foot security. Though it looks as though it’s tightly constructed, it’s touted to accommodate airflow.

The heel part makes use of the conventional open-mesh arrangement. It’s soft and flexible. Its prominent ventilation pores prevent the inner chamber from feeling too warm.

The Element Lining is a soft sleeve that’s able to wick off moisture. It also prevents chafing and blistering.

A Dynamic Hammock System causes the midfoot to adapt to the tightening and loosening of the shoelaces. It makes use of fabric cords that run from the bottom of the upper to the instep, with its loops acting as eyelets. The purpose of this scheme is to provide a secure yet unrestricted fit. It also relaxes the top part of the façade, thereby preventing skin-abrasion due to lace-tension.

Author
Jens Jakob Andersen
Jens Jakob Andersen

Jens Jakob is a fan of short distances with a 5K PR at 15:58 minutes. Based on 35 million race results, he's among the fastest 0.2% runners. Jens Jakob previously owned a running store, when he was also a competitive runner. His work is regularly featured in The New York Times, Washington Post, BBC and the likes as well as peer-reviewed journals. Finally, he has been a guest on +30 podcasts on running.

jens@runrepeat.com