|Update:||Altra Paradigm 4.5|
|Weight:||Men: 9.7oz | Women: 8oz|
|Heel to toe drop:||Men: 0mm | Women: 0mm|
|Arch type:||High arch|
|Strike Pattern:||Forefoot strike|
|Distance:||Daily running | Long distance | Marathon|
|Heel height:||Men: 31mm | Women: 31mm|
|Forefoot height:||Men: 31mm | Women: 31mm|
|Type:||Low drop | Zero drop | Maximalist|
|Width:||Men: Normal | Women: Normal|
|Colorways:||Black, Blue, Grey, Purple|
Experts are runners, who post reviews at youtube, directly at RunRepeat or at their own websites. Each expert is categorized from level 1 to level 5 based on expertise. See stats on expert reviews and how we calculate scores here.
Are you an expert? Apply to contribute here.
82 / 100 based on 3 expert reviews
Altra Paradigm 2.0 – Comfort comes with priceMore photos
Altra is famous for their natural shape with a lot of toe room.
For anyone with wider feet, they are definitely worth considering and have a wide array of models suited for various purposes.
After getting Paradigm 2.0 as well, hoping that they will be the road version of the Olympus. But they are not that, unfortunately.
Similar to the Olympus 2.0 model they have duck look due to the toebox design, but to me, it doesn't matter much.
Not the prettiest shoes, but they do have a certain charm.
This is what you'll be looking at. :)
Zero drop, 31mm heel, and 31mm forefoot thickness.
After feeling like running on clouds in Paradigm to provide identical feeling. Well... it is close but not identical. The ride is somewhat stiffer than Olympus. But still comfortable enough.
When choosing the size, if you are unable to try them in real life perhaps go a half size up. They are not very long and there is not much space left between toes and front of the shoe.
The width of the toe box is great. Enough room to splay the toes and feel free in them. They are perfect for my wide feet. If you have a narrow foot, you could have a problem with them being too wide for you.
Laces are not perfect, they tend to unlash themselves even when tightened properly, so you need to double lash them or use heel lock method to prevent the unlashing. Or even replace them with different laces. Also, they are too long. With heel lock method they are still dangling around. They should be 5-6cm shorter to be good.
If your heel slides in the shoe – use heel lock method with the laces.
Unlike Olympus they have some arch support, so if you have very low arches you could have problems. Fortunately mine are high enough, but I still feel a bit uncomfortable with the arch support on the beginning of the run.
Good thing is that they are light. Looking at them you would not expect them to be so light. They are not featherweight but for me they are light enough.
Sole & Durability
Sole is not Vibram, the material is quite soft, but seems to be durable enough. Problem with the sole pattern is that sometimes rocks get lodged in the crevices and it is irritating. So far I have maybe 100km in them, plus quite a lot of walking around. No wear/tear is noticeable on the soles or on the upper.
Upper looks to be made of quality build. It is seamless design with the hexagonal net pattern. Such upper construction is supposed to reduce the wear & tear of the material. Upper is breathable enough. Good thing is that shoes have toe protection.
Sole grip and toe protection are good enough for some easy trails, not just paved surfaces. They are even more stable than Olympus model.
Thick sole and unusual grip on the road shoes
Can you be fast in them? Yes, but you will tire quickly. I found them to be quite tiring when running faster. My pulse was also slightly higher than in some other shoes at same speeds. They seem to be best suited for slow and long distance runs.
With my 90+ kg, I had no issues with the comfort, no leg aches, and pains when running at slower speeds. But as soon as I try to go faster, then I start feeling my legs relatively quickly (after 3-5km).
Zero drop works good for me, but some people could have problems, especially if they have achiless tendon issues. On the first run with them, I did 15km on the asphalt and it was too much, Achilles was aching later.
If you are not used to zero drop, my advice is to start with shorter distances and stop the workout if you feel any discomfort in achilles tendon or calves.
I found that after 30 minutes running or so they seem to become stiffer. Maybe I am delusional (quite possible, all runners are delusional to some degree) but perhaps the thick sole really compresses to some degree after few kilometers.
I really wanted to love them. Paradigm 2.0 are good shoes, but they did leave me somewhat disappointed that I am unable to run faster in them for the longer distances.
Maybe it is not the case for everyone... YMMV. Because they are so comfortable I will give them chance for 5-10 more workouts, but if nothing changes they will be relegated to casual shoes for walking around.
If you are looking for good shoes to walk around on pavement or if you have a job standing all day, these could be the right choice for you (if you don't mind the zero drop).
If you will use them just for walking around, then I would rate them as 95%. Not 100% because they are not pretty. :)
They do have zero drop, so be careful with the transition if you have never worn zero drop shoes. Also if you have problems with Achilles tendon, perhaps it is better to avoid these shoes.
Ugly or not? I still cannot decide.
This expert has been verified by RunRepeat. Reviews are neutral, unbiased and based on extensive testing.
Some fans of Hoka but are looking for a much wider toebox could find relief in the Paradigm 2.0!
Basically, the shoes are shaped like your foot (giving your toes room to breathe and move naturally), and the toes and heel are equidistant from the ground, unlike other brands where your heel is higher and the front of your foot takes more unnecessary stress.
- Altra does not rock the boat when it comes to changes in the Paradigm 2.0. What is most noticeable is the simplified upper. Altra removed the slice of rand that basically stretches from one side of the shoe to the other. It now has very few printed overlays with the Altra logo serving as the main feature around the midfoot. The change offers more give without sacrificing support.
- A new mesh is introduced as well. The mesh is a bit thicker for better durability and compensates for the lack of overlays in the upper.
- Finally, Altra included reflective details in the 2.0 model, which was previously lacking from the earlier version. It makes running in low-light areas doable in this shoe.
The fit of the Paradigm 2.0 is practically a mirror image of the earlier models, except perhaps in better volume because of the removal of the forefoot rand. There is also a snugger midfoot and heel due to the slightly thicker mesh. The forefoot has the Altra-distinctive Foot-Shaped Toe Box for the toes to naturally splay. Runners with medium to slightly-wider feet should have no trouble getting their comfort zone in this shoe. Sizing is a bit off as it is slightly smaller than average.
Altra’s unique Foot Pod Technology uses a series of rubber configurations, especially just beneath the metatarsals to deliver natural responsiveness and flexibility. It is made mostly of carbon rubber for durability and traction. The full contact outsole gives it much-needed stability for a shoe with significant stack height. The same outsole design is also used in the new Altra Paradigm 4.
An extra slice of EVA is placed on top of the EVA over A-abound midsole setup. The added EVA gives the shoe that max cushioning feature. As the soft A-abound sits beneath the firm EVA, it handles much of the cushioning and impact protection. The firmness of the EVA adds an element of stability in the midsole as well.
The ultra-simple upper is largely composed of breathable mesh and printed overlays. Runners who wish for a more traditional design can opt for the 5mm contoured footbed. There is now reflective materials in various parts of the shoe for low-light running. An asymmetrical lacing removes pressure on top of the foot.